impossible. that name change would completely alter the entire vibe of the show, and, by logical extension, the entire course of human history after january 12 1997

the blanket notion that anything nsfw is exploitative and anything exploitative should be banned is unbelievably harmful to art in ways that puritans don't appreciate because eventually they'll find leopards ending their own face when the definition of "nsfw" expands to consume them.

specifically someone was complaining about problematic networks and someone said “nickelodeon hired artist who’ve drawn nsfw”. honestly it was kinda funny

saw someone in twitter yesterday implying that any form of nsfw art is problematic. wrote them off as just being just another online weirdo. seems like maybe that really is the direction we’re going. whoops!

i personally find this to be a VERY FUNNY IDEA. this is likely due to certain PRECONCEIVED BIASES OF MINE