Casper Hedegaard
@casi0clay.bsky.social
Non-artistic dog lover, and avid reader
Reposted by Casper Hedegaard
"Morality" is not apt.
The difference is, that we live in different worlds, with different facts, and with different views on the same problems.
Your rightwing is not morally bankrupt, they are just solving problems that does not exist in the real world, while ignoring the ones that do.
The difference is, that we live in different worlds, with different facts, and with different views on the same problems.
Your rightwing is not morally bankrupt, they are just solving problems that does not exist in the real world, while ignoring the ones that do.
November 28, 2024 at 8:31 AM
"Morality" is not apt.
The difference is, that we live in different worlds, with different facts, and with different views on the same problems.
Your rightwing is not morally bankrupt, they are just solving problems that does not exist in the real world, while ignoring the ones that do.
The difference is, that we live in different worlds, with different facts, and with different views on the same problems.
Your rightwing is not morally bankrupt, they are just solving problems that does not exist in the real world, while ignoring the ones that do.
Jeg vil give et "betinget" JA, til mit eget spørgsmål, men er helt enig i resten af din kommentar.
Jeg vil gerne høre @pelledragsted.bsky.social's svar på hvordan vi burde gøre det. DBU er jo ikke uenige i vores fremlægning, men bruger slutrunden som en brik i spillet.
Hvis ikke VM, så hvad?
Jeg vil gerne høre @pelledragsted.bsky.social's svar på hvordan vi burde gøre det. DBU er jo ikke uenige i vores fremlægning, men bruger slutrunden som en brik i spillet.
Hvis ikke VM, så hvad?
December 3, 2024 at 2:21 PM
Jeg vil give et "betinget" JA, til mit eget spørgsmål, men er helt enig i resten af din kommentar.
Jeg vil gerne høre @pelledragsted.bsky.social's svar på hvordan vi burde gøre det. DBU er jo ikke uenige i vores fremlægning, men bruger slutrunden som en brik i spillet.
Hvis ikke VM, så hvad?
Jeg vil gerne høre @pelledragsted.bsky.social's svar på hvordan vi burde gøre det. DBU er jo ikke uenige i vores fremlægning, men bruger slutrunden som en brik i spillet.
Hvis ikke VM, så hvad?
Fuldstændigt enig.
Sidespørgsmål:
Hvordan får vi Saudi (og landende omkring) til at stoppe med at være islamistiske, autokratiske, og kvindehadende?
og er det "vores" ansvar?
Sidespørgsmål:
Hvordan får vi Saudi (og landende omkring) til at stoppe med at være islamistiske, autokratiske, og kvindehadende?
og er det "vores" ansvar?
December 3, 2024 at 11:25 AM
Fuldstændigt enig.
Sidespørgsmål:
Hvordan får vi Saudi (og landende omkring) til at stoppe med at være islamistiske, autokratiske, og kvindehadende?
og er det "vores" ansvar?
Sidespørgsmål:
Hvordan får vi Saudi (og landende omkring) til at stoppe med at være islamistiske, autokratiske, og kvindehadende?
og er det "vores" ansvar?
I think the scale is my biggest concern. I can't, for the life of me, understand how this every entered national/global politics.
I wish people would just accept eachother, and realize that we all have to be here - and have fun being here. The toxicity surrounding that movement is abhorent.
I wish people would just accept eachother, and realize that we all have to be here - and have fun being here. The toxicity surrounding that movement is abhorent.
November 28, 2024 at 2:41 PM
I think the scale is my biggest concern. I can't, for the life of me, understand how this every entered national/global politics.
I wish people would just accept eachother, and realize that we all have to be here - and have fun being here. The toxicity surrounding that movement is abhorent.
I wish people would just accept eachother, and realize that we all have to be here - and have fun being here. The toxicity surrounding that movement is abhorent.
mm, I think some of the problems around gender identity is a problem liberals made up (even though I think republicans fanned that flame to an insane degree, in order to make it a political talking point).
November 28, 2024 at 2:21 PM
mm, I think some of the problems around gender identity is a problem liberals made up (even though I think republicans fanned that flame to an insane degree, in order to make it a political talking point).
I wholeheartedly agree.
November 28, 2024 at 2:19 PM
I wholeheartedly agree.
I agree - but my point is, that "they" believe they are solving the problems. It's not malicious (for most of them).
November 28, 2024 at 2:18 PM
I agree - but my point is, that "they" believe they are solving the problems. It's not malicious (for most of them).
Here you go again, why do you have to muddy your salient points with mindless fiction?
www.npr.org/2024/07/22/n... - from paragraph 6.
I believe the main reason democrats were killed on this issue is that their communication around it was terrible - and you're making my point with every utterance.
www.npr.org/2024/07/22/n... - from paragraph 6.
I believe the main reason democrats were killed on this issue is that their communication around it was terrible - and you're making my point with every utterance.
www.npr.org
November 28, 2024 at 2:11 PM
Here you go again, why do you have to muddy your salient points with mindless fiction?
www.npr.org/2024/07/22/n... - from paragraph 6.
I believe the main reason democrats were killed on this issue is that their communication around it was terrible - and you're making my point with every utterance.
www.npr.org/2024/07/22/n... - from paragraph 6.
I believe the main reason democrats were killed on this issue is that their communication around it was terrible - and you're making my point with every utterance.
I agree with your critique of the original poster.
November 28, 2024 at 2:08 PM
I agree with your critique of the original poster.
I agree
but if you stop apprehending, and do nothing, the total number of illegals should go up, and no one studying the issue believes it has.
The same can be said if the traffic goes up without an increase in apprehension-percentage.
but if you stop apprehending, and do nothing, the total number of illegals should go up, and no one studying the issue believes it has.
The same can be said if the traffic goes up without an increase in apprehension-percentage.
November 28, 2024 at 2:07 PM
I agree
but if you stop apprehending, and do nothing, the total number of illegals should go up, and no one studying the issue believes it has.
The same can be said if the traffic goes up without an increase in apprehension-percentage.
but if you stop apprehending, and do nothing, the total number of illegals should go up, and no one studying the issue believes it has.
The same can be said if the traffic goes up without an increase in apprehension-percentage.
No, this is form Pew Research Center, and the Center for Migration Studies.
www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/...
cmsny.org/us-undocumen...
www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/...
cmsny.org/us-undocumen...
What we know about unauthorized immigrants living in the U.S.
The unauthorized immigrant population in the U.S. grew to 11 million in 2022, but remained below the peak of 12.2 million in 2007.
www.pewresearch.org
November 28, 2024 at 1:59 PM
No, this is form Pew Research Center, and the Center for Migration Studies.
www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/...
cmsny.org/us-undocumen...
www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/...
cmsny.org/us-undocumen...
2023 is the last bar in the diagram.
I'm not sure what to tell you, if you do not believe the people who are actually keeping track of the numbers.
I'm not sure what to tell you, if you do not believe the people who are actually keeping track of the numbers.
November 28, 2024 at 1:58 PM
2023 is the last bar in the diagram.
I'm not sure what to tell you, if you do not believe the people who are actually keeping track of the numbers.
I'm not sure what to tell you, if you do not believe the people who are actually keeping track of the numbers.
from the article:
"Expulsions are migrants denied exclusively through Title 42 to stop the spread of COVID-19. This status only applied from March 2020 to May 2023."
"Expulsions are migrants denied exclusively through Title 42 to stop the spread of COVID-19. This status only applied from March 2020 to May 2023."
November 28, 2024 at 1:56 PM
from the article:
"Expulsions are migrants denied exclusively through Title 42 to stop the spread of COVID-19. This status only applied from March 2020 to May 2023."
"Expulsions are migrants denied exclusively through Title 42 to stop the spread of COVID-19. This status only applied from March 2020 to May 2023."
Every study also claim that the number of undocumented people living in the US has been in decline since 2005:
November 28, 2024 at 1:55 PM
Every study also claim that the number of undocumented people living in the US has been in decline since 2005:
They've had a lot more than 4 years, but luckily, they've been a lot better at sending people back and apprehending them over the last 4 years, than in years previous.
usafacts.org/articles/wha...
usafacts.org/articles/wha...
November 28, 2024 at 1:47 PM
They've had a lot more than 4 years, but luckily, they've been a lot better at sending people back and apprehending them over the last 4 years, than in years previous.
usafacts.org/articles/wha...
usafacts.org/articles/wha...
No one claims the United States southern border is without problems. That's why there was a bipartisan border bill in the US months before the election.
November 28, 2024 at 1:36 PM
No one claims the United States southern border is without problems. That's why there was a bipartisan border bill in the US months before the election.
Do you think, maybe, the financial crash of 08' had something to do with that, or no?
The fact that Obama brought deficit spending down to a point lower than at any point during Trumps tenure is quite amazing.
The fact that Obama brought deficit spending down to a point lower than at any point during Trumps tenure is quite amazing.
November 28, 2024 at 1:35 PM
Do you think, maybe, the financial crash of 08' had something to do with that, or no?
The fact that Obama brought deficit spending down to a point lower than at any point during Trumps tenure is quite amazing.
The fact that Obama brought deficit spending down to a point lower than at any point during Trumps tenure is quite amazing.
I'm not sure who you're responding to.
I did not make any of those claims, neither did anyone else.
I did not make any of those claims, neither did anyone else.
November 28, 2024 at 1:32 PM
I'm not sure who you're responding to.
I did not make any of those claims, neither did anyone else.
I did not make any of those claims, neither did anyone else.
Can you link it to me?
I must be misunderstanding something, then.
I apologize.
I must be misunderstanding something, then.
I apologize.
November 28, 2024 at 1:26 PM
Can you link it to me?
I must be misunderstanding something, then.
I apologize.
I must be misunderstanding something, then.
I apologize.
There will be a lot of "Actually..." in this thread x)
Love the show, James.
Love the show, James.
November 28, 2024 at 1:26 PM
There will be a lot of "Actually..." in this thread x)
Love the show, James.
Love the show, James.
I think it's becoming more and more obvious, that we can not have a discussion, as we do not agree on any of the facts.
I will leave it here, as I believe that makes my original point.
Thank you for taking the time to talk to me. Have a good day.
3/2
I will leave it here, as I believe that makes my original point.
Thank you for taking the time to talk to me. Have a good day.
3/2
November 28, 2024 at 1:24 PM
I think it's becoming more and more obvious, that we can not have a discussion, as we do not agree on any of the facts.
I will leave it here, as I believe that makes my original point.
Thank you for taking the time to talk to me. Have a good day.
3/2
I will leave it here, as I believe that makes my original point.
Thank you for taking the time to talk to me. Have a good day.
3/2
Trump had the highest deficit spending of any modern president fiscaldata.treasury.gov/americas-fin...
That should be virtually impossible with low unemployment rates and no wars, but he managed it anyway, due to terrible economic acumen.
2/2
That should be virtually impossible with low unemployment rates and no wars, but he managed it anyway, due to terrible economic acumen.
2/2
Fiscal Data Explains the National Deficit
Check out @FiscalService Fiscal Data’s new national deficit page! #NationalDeficit
fiscaldata.treasury.gov
November 28, 2024 at 1:23 PM
Trump had the highest deficit spending of any modern president fiscaldata.treasury.gov/americas-fin...
That should be virtually impossible with low unemployment rates and no wars, but he managed it anyway, due to terrible economic acumen.
2/2
That should be virtually impossible with low unemployment rates and no wars, but he managed it anyway, due to terrible economic acumen.
2/2
Just going off your own talking points (even though i disagree with employment rate / inflation / wars as being good indicators for a good economy)
Trump had the lowest inflation rate - Obama had a lower inflation rate: www.investopedia.com/us-inflation...
1/2
Trump had the lowest inflation rate - Obama had a lower inflation rate: www.investopedia.com/us-inflation...
1/2
U.S. Inflation Rate by President: From Eisenhower to Biden
Here are the average year-over-year inflation rates by president, and the events and economic conditions that contributed to them.
www.investopedia.com
November 28, 2024 at 1:21 PM
Just going off your own talking points (even though i disagree with employment rate / inflation / wars as being good indicators for a good economy)
Trump had the lowest inflation rate - Obama had a lower inflation rate: www.investopedia.com/us-inflation...
1/2
Trump had the lowest inflation rate - Obama had a lower inflation rate: www.investopedia.com/us-inflation...
1/2