I think it shows:
- Further dev/integration of AI predictive models for personalized medicine in Oncology
- Modeling to help better ID which patients could benefit from earlier palliative care/geriatrics
As pt live longer w/ cancer, this will only 📈
I think it shows:
- Further dev/integration of AI predictive models for personalized medicine in Oncology
- Modeling to help better ID which patients could benefit from earlier palliative care/geriatrics
As pt live longer w/ cancer, this will only 📈
Easy to get or include with monitoring labs for patients getting treatment. The only issue is on its own, seems to have fairly mild predictive effect (at least as estimated in the Cox proportional hazards method)
Easy to get or include with monitoring labs for patients getting treatment. The only issue is on its own, seems to have fairly mild predictive effect (at least as estimated in the Cox proportional hazards method)
It’s a screening for frailty in geriatric cancer patients that involves BMI, weight loss, polypharmacy, dementia/depression, mobility.
The big con I see is that this score isn’t computed for most oncology visits & isn’t abstractable from just chart review
It’s a screening for frailty in geriatric cancer patients that involves BMI, weight loss, polypharmacy, dementia/depression, mobility.
The big con I see is that this score isn’t computed for most oncology visits & isn’t abstractable from just chart review
1. Cox proportional hazards
Machine learning based:
2. Single Decision Tree
3. Random Survival Forest (best)
🔑 predictors: G8 score, tumor site/mets, & CRP/albumin
1. Cox proportional hazards
Machine learning based:
2. Single Decision Tree
3. Random Survival Forest (best)
🔑 predictors: G8 score, tumor site/mets, & CRP/albumin
If time was short, he wanted to spend with family, not healthcare system
My take away point: Dx of LC can ground prognosis/time (months) for patients to help guide goals of care
If time was short, he wanted to spend with family, not healthcare system
My take away point: Dx of LC can ground prognosis/time (months) for patients to help guide goals of care
Even patients with resectable lung cancer (so not metastatic) had earlier mortality by about 2 years if they had positive post op cancer in lymphatics than those who did not
Even patients with resectable lung cancer (so not metastatic) had earlier mortality by about 2 years if they had positive post op cancer in lymphatics than those who did not
"BLS" 🚑
Breast cancer (most common)
Lung cancer (2nd most common)
“Stomach” Gastric cancers (3rd most common)
"BLS" 🚑
Breast cancer (most common)
Lung cancer (2nd most common)
“Stomach” Gastric cancers (3rd most common)
Usually t/ clinical presentation + imaging
- CT scan: interstitial thickening, nodular opacities, and Kerley B lines
- PET: high specificity (100%) and sensitivity (86%), but hard to get in inpatient
Transbronchial biopsy is technically gold standard, but more morbid
Usually t/ clinical presentation + imaging
- CT scan: interstitial thickening, nodular opacities, and Kerley B lines
- PET: high specificity (100%) and sensitivity (86%), but hard to get in inpatient
Transbronchial biopsy is technically gold standard, but more morbid
LC occurs when cancer cells infiltrate the lymphatic vessels of the lungs, often leading to poor gas exchange → leading to dyspnea, cough, and fatigue
It’s often a 🚨 for poor prognosis - median survival is on the scale of months
LC occurs when cancer cells infiltrate the lymphatic vessels of the lungs, often leading to poor gas exchange → leading to dyspnea, cough, and fatigue
It’s often a 🚨 for poor prognosis - median survival is on the scale of months
Path can show "carcinoma of unknown primary”
The cancer is so undifferentiated, there are no specific tissue markers. Repeat biopsy usually not helpful unless you don’t have enough tissue to run molecular/genetic studies.
ascopubs.org/doi/10.1200/...
Path can show "carcinoma of unknown primary”
The cancer is so undifferentiated, there are no specific tissue markers. Repeat biopsy usually not helpful unless you don’t have enough tissue to run molecular/genetic studies.
ascopubs.org/doi/10.1200/...
Biopsies are a combination of:
- Histology: Tissue type
- IHC: Markers that can help determine origin & subtype
- Molecular: Genetic testing (can take longer to come back)
Ex: "Adenocarcinoma of lung [histology], positive for TTF-1... [IHC]
Biopsies are a combination of:
- Histology: Tissue type
- IHC: Markers that can help determine origin & subtype
- Molecular: Genetic testing (can take longer to come back)
Ex: "Adenocarcinoma of lung [histology], positive for TTF-1... [IHC]
Unfortunately, your pt may have multiple potential biopsy sites. Which one to target?
In general, you want your target to be: :
- Metastatic site over primary site
- Safe & easily accessible
- Core biopsies better than FNA [more tissue = more studies]
Unfortunately, your pt may have multiple potential biopsy sites. Which one to target?
In general, you want your target to be: :
- Metastatic site over primary site
- Safe & easily accessible
- Core biopsies better than FNA [more tissue = more studies]
Usually the answer is yes, but there are some exceptions.
- Notably HCC can be diagnosed primarily through imaging (triple phase CT or MRI)
- Some cancers (RCC, testicular, CNS) may require total excision as opposed to biopsy
Usually the answer is yes, but there are some exceptions.
- Notably HCC can be diagnosed primarily through imaging (triple phase CT or MRI)
- Some cancers (RCC, testicular, CNS) may require total excision as opposed to biopsy
Get a CT Chest/Abd/Pelvis with contrast. [Don't bother w/ inpatient PET]
This is fast and will tell if the cancer is localized or metastatic, which will help guide next steps
🧠 scans not part of initial staging unless syx
Get a CT Chest/Abd/Pelvis with contrast. [Don't bother w/ inpatient PET]
This is fast and will tell if the cancer is localized or metastatic, which will help guide next steps
🧠 scans not part of initial staging unless syx