Carrie Five 🐓
@carrie-the-one.bsky.social
My chickens live in Minneapolis.
Answer: yes, @hiltonhonors.bsky.social is clearly politically aligned with Elon Musk over the citizens of the actual district their hotel occupies.
July 30, 2025 at 3:56 AM
Answer: yes, @hiltonhonors.bsky.social is clearly politically aligned with Elon Musk over the citizens of the actual district their hotel occupies.
Minnesota isn’t the problem but that doesn’t mitigate the impact of federal policy and messaging #ElbowsUp #Never51
bsky.app/profile/mark...
bsky.app/profile/mark...
July 30, 2025 at 2:26 AM
Minnesota isn’t the problem but that doesn’t mitigate the impact of federal policy and messaging #ElbowsUp #Never51
bsky.app/profile/mark...
bsky.app/profile/mark...
Sorry that Clayton crossed your path.
The article linked is nightmare clickbait white nationalist AI slop trash (i know you know this). I wonder if Clayton is a bot.
On behalf of everyone exposed to this thread, thanks for your thoughtful & measured responses A Cup of Squids 🙏
The article linked is nightmare clickbait white nationalist AI slop trash (i know you know this). I wonder if Clayton is a bot.
On behalf of everyone exposed to this thread, thanks for your thoughtful & measured responses A Cup of Squids 🙏
July 20, 2025 at 8:21 PM
Sorry that Clayton crossed your path.
The article linked is nightmare clickbait white nationalist AI slop trash (i know you know this). I wonder if Clayton is a bot.
On behalf of everyone exposed to this thread, thanks for your thoughtful & measured responses A Cup of Squids 🙏
The article linked is nightmare clickbait white nationalist AI slop trash (i know you know this). I wonder if Clayton is a bot.
On behalf of everyone exposed to this thread, thanks for your thoughtful & measured responses A Cup of Squids 🙏
So here for a recap of that Loki/Thor lecture in thread form, just sayin’ 🥹🙏
July 20, 2025 at 7:04 PM
So here for a recap of that Loki/Thor lecture in thread form, just sayin’ 🥹🙏
This is super legit
July 17, 2025 at 3:12 AM
This is super legit
Texas = 696,000 km² = 7.1% of US total land area & ~9% of US pop
Alberta = 661,000 km² = 6.6% of Canada’s land area & ~12% of Can pop
AL is more sparsely populated than TX sure, but that’s true of Canada vs USA overall.
In terms of relative-to-country stats, there’s a lot of similarities.
Alberta = 661,000 km² = 6.6% of Canada’s land area & ~12% of Can pop
AL is more sparsely populated than TX sure, but that’s true of Canada vs USA overall.
In terms of relative-to-country stats, there’s a lot of similarities.
July 15, 2025 at 3:49 PM
Texas = 696,000 km² = 7.1% of US total land area & ~9% of US pop
Alberta = 661,000 km² = 6.6% of Canada’s land area & ~12% of Can pop
AL is more sparsely populated than TX sure, but that’s true of Canada vs USA overall.
In terms of relative-to-country stats, there’s a lot of similarities.
Alberta = 661,000 km² = 6.6% of Canada’s land area & ~12% of Can pop
AL is more sparsely populated than TX sure, but that’s true of Canada vs USA overall.
In terms of relative-to-country stats, there’s a lot of similarities.
Thank you Senator Booker!
April 1, 2025 at 2:58 AM
Thank you Senator Booker!
100% agree and it has a lot to do with why Canadian elections aren’t the same clown circus. But it’s also exactly the kind of boring politics nerd stuff 95% don’t pay attention to, thus a key target by wealth looking to expand power. Those laws need to be *protected*.
https://laws.it’s
March 28, 2025 at 1:51 PM
100% agree and it has a lot to do with why Canadian elections aren’t the same clown circus. But it’s also exactly the kind of boring politics nerd stuff 95% don’t pay attention to, thus a key target by wealth looking to expand power. Those laws need to be *protected*.
It’s time to do the right thing for the party and step down as senate minority leader.
March 28, 2025 at 5:32 AM
It’s time to do the right thing for the party and step down as senate minority leader.
Whoa that’s **huge**!!
I’d love to hear what changed your mind, if you’d be willing to share a little about that. What in the 2016 election cycle crossed a line for you? When you quit Fox, what did you switch to for news?
(wishing this app supported > 144 chars! not enough! 😆)
I’d love to hear what changed your mind, if you’d be willing to share a little about that. What in the 2016 election cycle crossed a line for you? When you quit Fox, what did you switch to for news?
(wishing this app supported > 144 chars! not enough! 😆)
March 24, 2025 at 12:48 PM
Whoa that’s **huge**!!
I’d love to hear what changed your mind, if you’d be willing to share a little about that. What in the 2016 election cycle crossed a line for you? When you quit Fox, what did you switch to for news?
(wishing this app supported > 144 chars! not enough! 😆)
I’d love to hear what changed your mind, if you’d be willing to share a little about that. What in the 2016 election cycle crossed a line for you? When you quit Fox, what did you switch to for news?
(wishing this app supported > 144 chars! not enough! 😆)
Some absolutely yes got what they hoped for.
I know people who are 100% unplugged from news & others people who are so in denial that they’re virtually dissociating or mainlining rhetoric even more now for safety/comfort.
I hold out some hope for some the latter, but understand why others don’t.
I know people who are 100% unplugged from news & others people who are so in denial that they’re virtually dissociating or mainlining rhetoric even more now for safety/comfort.
I hold out some hope for some the latter, but understand why others don’t.
March 24, 2025 at 4:43 AM
Some absolutely yes got what they hoped for.
I know people who are 100% unplugged from news & others people who are so in denial that they’re virtually dissociating or mainlining rhetoric even more now for safety/comfort.
I hold out some hope for some the latter, but understand why others don’t.
I know people who are 100% unplugged from news & others people who are so in denial that they’re virtually dissociating or mainlining rhetoric even more now for safety/comfort.
I hold out some hope for some the latter, but understand why others don’t.
I apologize for having provided feedback you didn’t directly ask for, and I’ll disengage here as we aren’t hearing one another. My bet is you and I probably actually agree on a whole lot, just a slight misalignment on tactics.
These are trying times.
I wish you all the best!
These are trying times.
I wish you all the best!
March 24, 2025 at 4:19 AM
I apologize for having provided feedback you didn’t directly ask for, and I’ll disengage here as we aren’t hearing one another. My bet is you and I probably actually agree on a whole lot, just a slight misalignment on tactics.
These are trying times.
I wish you all the best!
These are trying times.
I wish you all the best!
And in all seriousness, the irony of this thread is spectacular.
March 24, 2025 at 4:03 AM
And in all seriousness, the irony of this thread is spectacular.
Some of them are surely trolls. Some are real true believers. Many are probably straight bots.
But the people quietly reading the back-and-forth - who you name as your intended audience anyway - will also be more persuaded if you do just share links, facts and ease up on the language.
But the people quietly reading the back-and-forth - who you name as your intended audience anyway - will also be more persuaded if you do just share links, facts and ease up on the language.
March 24, 2025 at 3:58 AM
Some of them are surely trolls. Some are real true believers. Many are probably straight bots.
But the people quietly reading the back-and-forth - who you name as your intended audience anyway - will also be more persuaded if you do just share links, facts and ease up on the language.
But the people quietly reading the back-and-forth - who you name as your intended audience anyway - will also be more persuaded if you do just share links, facts and ease up on the language.
Oh sorry no! I meant not engaging with strangers on social media, not to not vote.
“You aren’t familiar with the real world” is combative. Purposely? I, like you, am passing along facts. Telling people that they’re clueless won’t inform them, & won’t inform people passively reading your messages.
“You aren’t familiar with the real world” is combative. Purposely? I, like you, am passing along facts. Telling people that they’re clueless won’t inform them, & won’t inform people passively reading your messages.
March 24, 2025 at 3:53 AM
Oh sorry no! I meant not engaging with strangers on social media, not to not vote.
“You aren’t familiar with the real world” is combative. Purposely? I, like you, am passing along facts. Telling people that they’re clueless won’t inform them, & won’t inform people passively reading your messages.
“You aren’t familiar with the real world” is combative. Purposely? I, like you, am passing along facts. Telling people that they’re clueless won’t inform them, & won’t inform people passively reading your messages.
I believe you you’ve tried other approaches! But for other people reading this, the example you shared, telling people they’re clueless…
The psychology says that’s going to cause them to retreat further into their beliefs. And you would be better off not engaging.
The psychology says that’s going to cause them to retreat further into their beliefs. And you would be better off not engaging.
March 24, 2025 at 3:14 AM
I believe you you’ve tried other approaches! But for other people reading this, the example you shared, telling people they’re clueless…
The psychology says that’s going to cause them to retreat further into their beliefs. And you would be better off not engaging.
The psychology says that’s going to cause them to retreat further into their beliefs. And you would be better off not engaging.
If you know these people IRL, they’re better to have these convos IRL.
If these are strangers on a FB thread…you’d need to tread v lightly to find a way in. Social media isn’t good at facilitating convos, it just much rewards the pwning each other. People are conditioned to expect attacks.
3/X
If these are strangers on a FB thread…you’d need to tread v lightly to find a way in. Social media isn’t good at facilitating convos, it just much rewards the pwning each other. People are conditioned to expect attacks.
3/X
https://thread.you’d
March 24, 2025 at 3:11 AM
If you know these people IRL, they’re better to have these convos IRL.
If these are strangers on a FB thread…you’d need to tread v lightly to find a way in. Social media isn’t good at facilitating convos, it just much rewards the pwning each other. People are conditioned to expect attacks.
3/X
If these are strangers on a FB thread…you’d need to tread v lightly to find a way in. Social media isn’t good at facilitating convos, it just much rewards the pwning each other. People are conditioned to expect attacks.
3/X
When people sense they're being scolded or attacked, even a little, they literally to shut you out & mentally tripple down on their original position. The phenomenon is called belief hardening.
2/X
2/X
March 24, 2025 at 3:05 AM
When people sense they're being scolded or attacked, even a little, they literally to shut you out & mentally tripple down on their original position. The phenomenon is called belief hardening.
2/X
2/X
I’ve been reading a lot about communicating across ideological divides of late. I know you’re trying, I credit you that! But if you want to reach people you need to soften your language a whole lot.
1/X
1/X
March 24, 2025 at 3:00 AM
I’ve been reading a lot about communicating across ideological divides of late. I know you’re trying, I credit you that! But if you want to reach people you need to soften your language a whole lot.
1/X
1/X