LightNews LightNews
carolla1.bsky.social
@carolla1.bsky.social
2.2K followers 1.7K following 14 posts
Posts Replies Media Videos
Reposted
papootx.bsky.social
Defend Immigrants From Hate
bsky.app/profile/papo...
papootx.bsky.social Bryan 🌐 🇺🇦 personal opinions only @papootx.bsky.social · 6h
Stephen Miller Would Kill His Parents Before He Was Born

"If my nephew’s ideas on immigration had been in force a century ago, our family would have been wiped out."

Beset by violent anti-Jewish pogroms in Russia, Miller's ancestors migrated to America in 1903.

www.politico.com/magazine/sto...
Stephen Miller Is an Immigration Hypocrite. I Know Because I’m His Uncle.
If my nephew’s ideas on immigration had been in force a century ago, our family would have been wiped out.
www.politico.com
November 30, 2025 at 4:18 PM
Reposted
janevoter2018.bsky.social
A serious illegal order to “kill everybody” on a boat at sea, has seen the light of day. It could result in the SECDEF & EVERYONE who followed his order tried for a war crime &/or murder, according to former JAGs working group’s statement.

Sen. Kelly et al had reason to warn military personnel.
The Former JAGs Working Group unanimously considers both the giving and the execution of these orders, if true, to constitute war crimes, murder, or both. Our group was established in February 2025 in response to the SECDEF's firing of the Army and Air Force Judge Advocates General and his systematic dismantling of the military's legal guardrails. Had those guardrails been in place, we are confident they would have prevented these crimes. • If the U.S. military operation to interdict and destroy suspected narcotrafficking vessels is a "non-international armed conflict," as the Trump Administration suggests, orders to "kill everybody," which can reasonably be regarded as an order to give "no quarter," and to "double-tap" a target in order to kill survivors, are clearly illegal under international law. In short, they are war crimes. • If the U.S. military operation is not an armed conflict of any kind, these orders to kill helpless civilians clinging to the wreckage of a vessel our military destroyed would subject everyone from SECDEF down to the individual who pulled the trigger to prosecution under U.S. law for murder. We call upon Congress to investigate and the American people to oppose any use of the U.S. military that involves the intentional targeting of anyone - enemy combatants, non-combatants, or civilians -rendered hors de combat ("out of the fight") as a result of their wounds or the destruction of the ship or aircraft carrying them. We also advise our fellow citizens that orders like those described above are the kinds of "patently illegal orders" all military members have a duty to disobey. Since orders to kill survivors of an attack at sea are "patently illegal," anyone who issues or follows such orders can and should be prosecuted for war crimes, murder, or both.
November 30, 2025 at 4:09 PM
Reposted
frenchie-66.bsky.social
Obama was right when he gave his SOTU and offended Samual Alito when Obama denounced the Citizen United Decision. He said it would open the door to foreign actors, in other words, open the door for bad actors. I watched Alito & his smugness.
words.open
November 30, 2025 at 1:03 PM
Reposted
sonsofliberty.vote
It also details how to sow division in the US through campaigns stoking political & racial tensions with psyops focusing on generating distrust of our government & immigrants through social media systems, news, etc.

It outlines a future where the west is contained, Russia, China rule the rest.
November 30, 2025 at 1:16 PM