@carjak.bsky.social
This, I am afraid, is complete bollocks. Pretty much all of it.
January 16, 2026 at 5:40 PM
This, I am afraid, is complete bollocks. Pretty much all of it.
I think anyone who understands science will likely believe that sex is real, and in humans, immutable, Robin.
January 16, 2026 at 5:34 PM
I think anyone who understands science will likely believe that sex is real, and in humans, immutable, Robin.
Also, absolute lol that you screenshotted a dictionary definition to pretend you know what words mean. Are you a child?
August 13, 2025 at 4:07 PM
Also, absolute lol that you screenshotted a dictionary definition to pretend you know what words mean. Are you a child?
Again, you seem hard of reading. Try again. For a man who has no interest in what I say, you keep coming back.
Generally, in my experience, grown men asking girls if they need help choosing their bra is not ‘perfectly normal’. That’s not what prurience means you silly midwitted fool.
Generally, in my experience, grown men asking girls if they need help choosing their bra is not ‘perfectly normal’. That’s not what prurience means you silly midwitted fool.
August 13, 2025 at 4:06 PM
Again, you seem hard of reading. Try again. For a man who has no interest in what I say, you keep coming back.
Generally, in my experience, grown men asking girls if they need help choosing their bra is not ‘perfectly normal’. That’s not what prurience means you silly midwitted fool.
Generally, in my experience, grown men asking girls if they need help choosing their bra is not ‘perfectly normal’. That’s not what prurience means you silly midwitted fool.
Hmm…whilst all of this is nonsense, what is most amusing is that you clearly don’t understand what prurient means.
August 12, 2025 at 6:03 PM
Hmm…whilst all of this is nonsense, what is most amusing is that you clearly don’t understand what prurient means.
And I will sign off on with one final observation: you are a midwit progressive. There’s no intellectual heft behind your opinion, just a tribal affiliation to ‘your side’. No deep thinking, no intelligence, no knowledge beyond the surface level, just unthinking incoherence all the way down.
August 11, 2025 at 4:59 PM
And I will sign off on with one final observation: you are a midwit progressive. There’s no intellectual heft behind your opinion, just a tribal affiliation to ‘your side’. No deep thinking, no intelligence, no knowledge beyond the surface level, just unthinking incoherence all the way down.
It says everything about you that you think the “cruelest people on earth” in your entire life are those that don’t want men talking to teenagers when they’re choosing a bra. It is obvious that you, deep down, hate women and girls. So much so, that you think men make better women than actual women.
August 11, 2025 at 11:48 AM
It says everything about you that you think the “cruelest people on earth” in your entire life are those that don’t want men talking to teenagers when they’re choosing a bra. It is obvious that you, deep down, hate women and girls. So much so, that you think men make better women than actual women.
I’m old enough to remember when being a gender critical feminist was left wing and radical - the clue is in the R in terf - and the fact that the left has been captured by this incoherent bullshit reminds us that misogyny is not the exclusive preserve of the right.
August 11, 2025 at 11:42 AM
I’m old enough to remember when being a gender critical feminist was left wing and radical - the clue is in the R in terf - and the fact that the left has been captured by this incoherent bullshit reminds us that misogyny is not the exclusive preserve of the right.
If you had your way, if a literal rapist who put on a dress and declared he is a woman, you’d agree and stick him in a cell with vulnerable women rather than admit that maybe, just maybe, merely claiming you are a female is really fucking stupid way of defining womanhood and keeping women/girls safe
August 11, 2025 at 11:38 AM
If you had your way, if a literal rapist who put on a dress and declared he is a woman, you’d agree and stick him in a cell with vulnerable women rather than admit that maybe, just maybe, merely claiming you are a female is really fucking stupid way of defining womanhood and keeping women/girls safe
And when a child tells you that they don’t want to creepy man ask them about their bras, you call *them* a genital obsessed pervert. You really are fucking unpleasant prick, a typical example of progressive misogyny. I’ve seen countless examples of you. You disgust me.
August 11, 2025 at 11:35 AM
And when a child tells you that they don’t want to creepy man ask them about their bras, you call *them* a genital obsessed pervert. You really are fucking unpleasant prick, a typical example of progressive misogyny. I’ve seen countless examples of you. You disgust me.
You people are absurd. You spout obvious nonsense that sex is fluid, yet can’t offer a justification for it, but you are happy to talk the word of a man in a dress that he is, in fact, a woman and not at all danger to women and girls and should be allowed to see them undress. And you call me squalid
August 11, 2025 at 11:32 AM
You people are absurd. You spout obvious nonsense that sex is fluid, yet can’t offer a justification for it, but you are happy to talk the word of a man in a dress that he is, in fact, a woman and not at all danger to women and girls and should be allowed to see them undress. And you call me squalid
Not sure it is bigoted to want girls to be choosing bras without the help of strange men. But regardless, you seem keen to deflect from your obvious nonsense that sex has had multiple definitions over time.
August 11, 2025 at 11:29 AM
Not sure it is bigoted to want girls to be choosing bras without the help of strange men. But regardless, you seem keen to deflect from your obvious nonsense that sex has had multiple definitions over time.
I find your inability to understand what a man is amusing.
August 11, 2025 at 11:27 AM
I find your inability to understand what a man is amusing.
Yes I am, but because you blocked me without giving me a chance to explain, I won’t bother educating you on this. It’s a shame, as it is a relatively simple concept, even you could understand if you were willing to listen.
August 11, 2025 at 10:47 AM
Yes I am, but because you blocked me without giving me a chance to explain, I won’t bother educating you on this. It’s a shame, as it is a relatively simple concept, even you could understand if you were willing to listen.
But, you clearly DO care, given that you seem to be having this conversation with several different people on this platform. Continually reminding us all that you do not understand what sex is. You’re just too cowardly and stupid to be able to back up what you say with facts.
August 11, 2025 at 10:39 AM
But, you clearly DO care, given that you seem to be having this conversation with several different people on this platform. Continually reminding us all that you do not understand what sex is. You’re just too cowardly and stupid to be able to back up what you say with facts.
You said that the definition of sex has changed over time. I have replied showing that quite clearly it has not. I’m not surprised you want the conversation to end before your foolishness is exposed more.
August 11, 2025 at 10:38 AM
You said that the definition of sex has changed over time. I have replied showing that quite clearly it has not. I’m not surprised you want the conversation to end before your foolishness is exposed more.
It is very odd that you think it is squalid to think that it is not ok for men to sidle up to teenage girls when they’re looking at bras and ask if they need any help. The only squalid person here is the man who is defending this sort of behaviour.
August 11, 2025 at 10:37 AM
It is very odd that you think it is squalid to think that it is not ok for men to sidle up to teenage girls when they’re looking at bras and ask if they need any help. The only squalid person here is the man who is defending this sort of behaviour.
I never did. Sex is defined with respect to gametes. That’s why the categories are called ‘sexes’ not ‘chromosomes’. You will never escape the biological reality that all human beings ever born are the product of a male sex cell and a female sex cell. It is a binary. Always has been.
August 11, 2025 at 10:17 AM
I never did. Sex is defined with respect to gametes. That’s why the categories are called ‘sexes’ not ‘chromosomes’. You will never escape the biological reality that all human beings ever born are the product of a male sex cell and a female sex cell. It is a binary. Always has been.
This response says so much more about you than it does about me. It’s really not that odd to think that grown men should not be asking teenage girls if they need help choosing a bra.
August 11, 2025 at 10:14 AM
This response says so much more about you than it does about me. It’s really not that odd to think that grown men should not be asking teenage girls if they need help choosing a bra.
It’s cruel that men are not allowed to approach teenage girls in the lingerie section? Interesting sense of progressivism you have there pal
August 11, 2025 at 7:08 AM
It’s cruel that men are not allowed to approach teenage girls in the lingerie section? Interesting sense of progressivism you have there pal
If the concepts of male and female change over time, how come it always takes a sperm and an egg to make a human, and no other combination of gamete (ie other type of gamete) has ever made a human? Literally all humans, ever. Change over time? Seems pretty fixed to me.
August 11, 2025 at 7:07 AM
If the concepts of male and female change over time, how come it always takes a sperm and an egg to make a human, and no other combination of gamete (ie other type of gamete) has ever made a human? Literally all humans, ever. Change over time? Seems pretty fixed to me.
And finally, of course, asking me how GI can clearly be untrue is no different to asking me how fairies can be untrue. That’s not how it works. If GI is real, show me the evidence that it is. People believing something is not the same as it being real. What is it in the brain that makes GI? Nothing
August 7, 2025 at 5:26 PM
And finally, of course, asking me how GI can clearly be untrue is no different to asking me how fairies can be untrue. That’s not how it works. If GI is real, show me the evidence that it is. People believing something is not the same as it being real. What is it in the brain that makes GI? Nothing
Until you do, all I have is the idea that trans people who are born male think that being feminine means they are female. Because *that is what they are saying*, and why they want to gain access to female only spaces. If that claim is legitimate, explain how.
August 7, 2025 at 5:24 PM
Until you do, all I have is the idea that trans people who are born male think that being feminine means they are female. Because *that is what they are saying*, and why they want to gain access to female only spaces. If that claim is legitimate, explain how.
You have claimed that trans people do not claim to be a different sex than the one they were born with, and yet this argument is about whether the sex we are born with is used to categorise safe spaces for females; trans people who are male want access to those. Why is that if what you say is true?
August 7, 2025 at 5:22 PM
You have claimed that trans people do not claim to be a different sex than the one they were born with, and yet this argument is about whether the sex we are born with is used to categorise safe spaces for females; trans people who are male want access to those. Why is that if what you say is true?