😅
😅
Paolo Bacigalupi S2E2
Harlan Ellison S2E7
J.G. Ballard S2E8
Bruce Sterling S3E6
Paolo Bacigalupi S2E2
Harlan Ellison S2E7
J.G. Ballard S2E8
Bruce Sterling S3E6
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of...
Peter F. Hamilton S1E1
Neal Asher S2E5 / S3E2 / S3E7
John Scalzi S1E2 / S1E6 / S1E17 / S2E1 / S3E1
Alastair Reynolds S1E7 / S1E14
...
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of...
Peter F. Hamilton S1E1
Neal Asher S2E5 / S3E2 / S3E7
John Scalzi S1E2 / S1E6 / S1E17 / S2E1 / S3E1
Alastair Reynolds S1E7 / S1E14
...
Nevertheless, the episodic novel gets a 5/5.
Nevertheless, the episodic novel gets a 5/5.
‘The physicists have known sin,’ said J. Robert Oppenheimer in 1947, of their responsibility for the atomic bomb, ‘and this is a knowledge which they cannot lose.’
‘The physicists have known sin,’ said J. Robert Oppenheimer in 1947, of their responsibility for the atomic bomb, ‘and this is a knowledge which they cannot lose.’
I just finished reading "To Say Nothing of the Dog" 😂😂😂 which can be read as a sequel to *Doomsday Book*, although it can stand on its own -
I just finished reading "To Say Nothing of the Dog" 😂😂😂 which can be read as a sequel to *Doomsday Book*, although it can stand on its own -
by John C. Wright: written as a tribute to Hodgson's original – at least that's how it was for me.
Wright writes in a more modern style (no wonder), and I hadn't even read the original. My attempt to read Hodgson afterward ended with a DNF.
by John C. Wright: written as a tribute to Hodgson's original – at least that's how it was for me.
Wright writes in a more modern style (no wonder), and I hadn't even read the original. My attempt to read Hodgson afterward ended with a DNF.
Subjectively felt it was too long - 200 pages (original) would have been enough for me 😉
Subjectively felt it was too long - 200 pages (original) would have been enough for me 😉
The scientific basis is fascinating (no wonder, McAuley is a trained biologist)
The scientific basis is fascinating (no wonder, McAuley is a trained biologist)
The scientific basis is fascinating (no wonder, McAuley is a trained biologist)
The scientific basis is fascinating (no wonder, McAuley is a trained biologist)
Adam Roberts is a guarantee for the once-desired conceptual breakthrough or paradigm shift in a science fiction novel—and you can take that literally: Roberts writes singletons with a punch.
His "Polystom" is another prime example in that regard
Adam Roberts is a guarantee for the once-desired conceptual breakthrough or paradigm shift in a science fiction novel—and you can take that literally: Roberts writes singletons with a punch.
His "Polystom" is another prime example in that regard
... and in the last third terraforming and the start of repopulation of the earth, in between a 5000 year long time jump.
=> A decent story (especially the plot sections in the habitat and on the asteroid), the last third drags, and thererfor not in my top 5 of his works
... and in the last third terraforming and the start of repopulation of the earth, in between a 5000 year long time jump.
=> A decent story (especially the plot sections in the habitat and on the asteroid), the last third drags, and thererfor not in my top 5 of his works