Two studies from the early 2000s said there were 15,000 hospitalizations a year. Here is one of them. But I realized THEY ARE CITING A PAPER PUBLISHED IN 1900.
And I thought pediatric cancer was understudied! 2/
Two studies from the early 2000s said there were 15,000 hospitalizations a year. Here is one of them. But I realized THEY ARE CITING A PAPER PUBLISHED IN 1900.
And I thought pediatric cancer was understudied! 2/
Mostly academics did what they normally do which is publish articles in the peer reviewed literature. We’re not professionally rewarded for op-eds. We’re rewarded for research.
October 22, 2025 at 11:24 PM
Mostly academics did what they normally do which is publish articles in the peer reviewed literature. We’re not professionally rewarded for op-eds. We’re rewarded for research.
Particularly in science. Yes we do have to hire someone to teach the class on, say, health inequalities that may be required by the accreditation board for our discipline, and that person will very likely tilt left. But we also need to hire health economists.
October 20, 2025 at 10:32 PM
Particularly in science. Yes we do have to hire someone to teach the class on, say, health inequalities that may be required by the accreditation board for our discipline, and that person will very likely tilt left. But we also need to hire health economists.
Agree but there is less groupthink than you imagine. Remember that academia has always been safe employment for cranks, oddballs, and devil’s advocates. Not everyone wants to be the odd man out, but it wouldn’t be that hard to just do your thing and stay out of the fray.
October 20, 2025 at 10:12 PM
Agree but there is less groupthink than you imagine. Remember that academia has always been safe employment for cranks, oddballs, and devil’s advocates. Not everyone wants to be the odd man out, but it wouldn’t be that hard to just do your thing and stay out of the fray.
Cutting funding for PhD students, as has been done widely, will not be an effective way to open up the academy to conservatives. It will only narrow the pool of matriculated students to the children of the wealthy.
October 19, 2025 at 4:23 PM
Cutting funding for PhD students, as has been done widely, will not be an effective way to open up the academy to conservatives. It will only narrow the pool of matriculated students to the children of the wealthy.
If conservatives want more conservatives in academia, then they should get PhDs and apply for the jobs. We can only choose between the folks that apply.
October 19, 2025 at 4:16 PM
If conservatives want more conservatives in academia, then they should get PhDs and apply for the jobs. We can only choose between the folks that apply.