And Canada has several pipelines to BC's west coast.

Bill C-69 included several legislation that was either new or amended, including the Impact Assessment Act. What are the implications then, of repealing the Bill?

If they repeal the Impact Assessment Act, wouldn't the Canadian Environmental Assessment Act, 2012 then be in place. What would that accomplish?

Which Bill C-69 are you talking about? The one from 2019 or the one from 2024? If you mean the one from 2019, the IA Act was not the only Act in that Bill so it was not formerly Bill C-69. Also, if you repeal the IA Act, you get back to CEAA 2012 - what is the difference?

He has a concept of a plan. Maybe?

I thought they were making fun of Trump and the way he stands.

This facility deleted its review option from its Facebook page because of criticism. You have to be a certain religion to attend. I fear for the vulnerable women who have no choice but to go to this facility. And the facility is flaunting them (plastering their faces on Facebook) to get donations.

No one can argue with that.

Well he did say in the e-mail to Norway that he no longer feels an obligation to think purely of peace. Although that feeling likely disappeared years ago. Will be interesting to see what other countries will do now.

Apparently only to be a permanent member, i.e., to stay after the first three years. But I don't think Canadians want our Prime Minister involved in this at all.

Too much american television.

I think it is becoming increasingly clear that Epstein and Maxwell worked for Trump.

There was an active investigation during Biden's term so the records couldn't be released. If they aren't incriminating against Trump, why won't he ensure they are released. The lengths to which he is ensuring they don't get released suggests that Epstein and Maxwell worked for him.

Maybe he's planning to give Alaska to Putin.

Paid vacation in russia?

It takes the will - that is all.

Government tends to cut programs without looking at their value. It is easy to identify programs that support sustainable fisheries - why cut those? Senior managers care more about their careers than sustainable fisheries and important programs may be cut. The public needs to speak up - if may help.

So O'Leary blames Trump ...?

PP is a republican.