camsmith.bsky.social
camsmith.bsky.social
@camsmith.bsky.social
These scorelines are going to be the death of all non Power 4 CFP inclusion when it expands to 16 (imminently?). No way Sankey and Petitti give away two more shoo-in berths for 3 loss teams (who, to be fair, would be immensely more competitive than Tulane or JMU)
December 21, 2025 at 2:48 AM
Down to the Swoosh
December 20, 2025 at 2:47 AM
I mean, is it really a surprise after .337 dude?
December 12, 2025 at 9:44 PM
Michigan hires Brohm, Louisville takes back Satterfield. Who says no? (Probably Brohm, but we can dream …)
December 11, 2025 at 4:22 AM
Go straight to jail
December 10, 2025 at 5:19 AM
And Texas is better than all three, with better losses and a better resume. And BYU may be as or more deserving than all three. Absolutely none of it makes sense
December 7, 2025 at 6:40 PM
This is VERY funny and I’m upset no one else gave you flowers for this. You should be trademarking this thing …
December 7, 2025 at 4:16 AM
It should!! They have the best resume of the four. The best group of wins, and better losses than Bama or Miami. Also the top strength of schedule of any team in the CFP rankings. It’s the sane thing to do … so there’s no way they’ll do it
December 7, 2025 at 4:15 AM
Texas’ resume is objectively better than Bama’s now. And Notre Dame’s (win over A&M vs. loss, and that was in South Bend) and Miami (get out of here with the trash ACC with a 7-win conference champ). It genuinely doesn’t make any sense.
December 7, 2025 at 4:11 AM
Preach
December 7, 2025 at 4:06 AM
Now put Texas on that graphic, too. When you add them everyone else moves a slot back because of the top-10 wins. I don’t understand how the committee could possibly rank Bama ahead of them now (even the UGA comparable falls flat)
December 7, 2025 at 1:30 AM