calccon.bsky.social
@calccon.bsky.social
Her security had no idea who he was, and as far as they knew at the time, he was attempting to assassinate the Security of Homeland Security

What laws ? Criminal Trespass. Resisting Arrest/Obstructing a Law Enforcement Officer. Disorderly Conduct. Assaulting a Federal Officer.
June 19, 2025 at 2:49 PM
He approached the Secretary of Homeland Security in an aggressive, threatening manner.

He was not wearing his proper ID (his security pin), entered a restricted area, engaged in disruptive behavior, and physically resisted law enforcement when confronted.

He broke half-a-dozen laws.
June 19, 2025 at 2:42 PM
A Senator is no different than any other American!. If he broke the law, he needs to be arrested, tried, and if convicted, serve his time.
June 12, 2025 at 8:28 PM
we will review
The Thermodynamic Limit
Size-Extensivity and Size-Consistency
The Linked Cluster Thereom
The high Temperate & Annealed Approximations

& then we will get into

The Large-N Saddle Point Approximation
HCIZ Integrals and the Exact Renormalization Group
Branch cuts and phase transitions
February 13, 2025 at 7:26 PM
if interested, please join the weightwatcher community Discord

weightwatcher.ai
discord.com/invite/uVVsE...
WeightWatcher: Data-Free Diagnostics for Deep Learning
WeightWatcher is an open source data free diagnostic tool for training, monitoring and improving Deep Learning models.
weightwatcher.ai
January 20, 2025 at 5:16 PM
It would be a great read for any PhD student, postdoc, or researcher interested in how to apply techniques from theoretical physics and chemistry to deep learning. sis.
January 20, 2025 at 5:16 PM
The Critical Brain Hypothesis proposes that neural systems operate near a critical point—a sweet spot between order and chaos. This idea is rooted in Self-Organized Criticality (SOC), as described by Per Bak (in How Nature Works). At this critical state, systems exhibit power law behavior
January 19, 2025 at 6:57 PM
The claims on Hopfield make no sense. Hopfield cited a 1977 Amari paper that literally says "This work is an development of my 1971 work" . Yet, somehow, citing this 1977 paper is plagiarism, but citing 1971 paper it would not be ?!

This is just not credible.

www.researchgate.net/publication/...
December 8, 2024 at 8:01 AM