You're right about that, it's not great because it's too early in my opinion. MIT did a study that 95% of AI products fail to reach market or return a profit which is wild considering how much money we're burning on the AI pyre. I think AI has a place in science but not on a consumer LLM level

Pattern recognition is a big deal in a lot of fields of study like gene sequencing, climat modeling, pollution modeling,patterns in medical imaging, the list goes on.

These are almost always not an LLM. I personally believe that the future of AI isn't on a consumer level I think it's scientific.

I'm not dissing on AI. It's going to be a powerful tool to add to mankind's arsenal once we figure out how it's best applies. Sarah Chasins at UC Berkeley said it well, AI is really good at figuring out what words look good next to each other. Now switch words for any other data type, eg pixels.

To say that makinds "idea machine" is frozen is a wild statement. We've never slowed down in development. AI is another tool but it isn't a saving grace. It's really good at identifying patterns that already exist not creating new ones.

Why don't they just text the dispatcher a link to their Livestream, more efficient 😂.

Seriously though this is going to be helpful for emergency services.

It helps Google's numbers that they just gave every student and instructor a year of Gemini Pro for free. I am still wondering when they're going to turn a profit on these investments.

There's nothing stopping them from distributing the APK file on an internal resource. This way Google saves face and they continue operations. Until a public statement is made by Google that they're no longer providing it I would assume it's still going on.

Now I want to see a Watch dogs Dead sec crossover with GTA