Coupled with a lack of understanding of consensus mechanisms, they probably see strong regulation as the only answer.
Coupled with a lack of understanding of consensus mechanisms, they probably see strong regulation as the only answer.
I think it'd be cool if people could fork lists too if a respected list goes rogue or is not maintained.
And having some local user logic that can override the mute list for people of your choosing.
I think it'd be cool if people could fork lists too if a respected list goes rogue or is not maintained.
And having some local user logic that can override the mute list for people of your choosing.
For ex. let's say you sub to a list meant to mute a group of malicious people. But let's say the owner of that list's definition of malicious grows more liberal over time.
For ex. let's say you sub to a list meant to mute a group of malicious people. But let's say the owner of that list's definition of malicious grows more liberal over time.
He popped up on my radar out of nowhere recently.
Can you point out to me what he's lied about exactly and why they are lies?
He popped up on my radar out of nowhere recently.
Can you point out to me what he's lied about exactly and why they are lies?
Alright, you do you 🤷♂️
Alright, you do you 🤷♂️
But I don't see how a debate that could be educating for a large number of people about the science could be so bad.
I disagree that the purpose here is to generate profit.
But I don't see how a debate that could be educating for a large number of people about the science could be so bad.
I disagree that the purpose here is to generate profit.
Can you help me out by pointing out what RFK Jr. has lied about and explain why they are lies?
Can you help me out by pointing out what RFK Jr. has lied about and explain why they are lies?