Any idiot can cut costs 🙃
youtube.com/shorts/lvb4u...

A world where both exist and are useful is possible

\o/
The wasted space of the empty 'Recommended apps' section is so fracking stupid when disabled 😅

i suspect an incorrect error message instead; offsetting the iat by 200s still tells me it should be in the past, offsetting by 201s starts telling me it's too far in the past :) back to checking my localhost oauth setup, might be something in there

(talk about choosing your words carelessly... i meant having my own identity server and my own data from different services centralized 'in a single place', even if this place is part of a somewhat decentralized network - hopefully the idea came across)

Although we'll need a cooler name than PDS to make it cool for non-tech people.

DataVault? DataCore?

Later, once I understand that my PDS holds my whole 'personal database', I can move it (e.g. in a provider in my own country far from prying eyes, or self-host, etc.) with everything still working.

To me, a centralized identity and PDS will be more enticing than decentralization itself.

I can potentially signup on any service that host a PDS and use 'Login with bluesky' (for now, hopefully 'Login with PDS' or something less branded in the future) and my identity is there, centralized.

And it certainly did - having to choose an instance when signing up *is* complex for most people. They don't understand what it entails, and it seems like migrating instances is a PITA/not entirely possible.

The fact that atproto PDS and identity are cross-compatible seems huge, to me.

I remember when Mastodon started getting known, I found the idea of decentralization really interesting - for me. But I know that *most* people will never self-host anything like this, and *most* people don't really care about decentralization - especially if it made things more complex.

Les places assises courent pas forcément les rues non plus aux heures de pointe ^^

La bureaucratie espagnole m'a également fait voir la bureaucratie belge sous un angle nouveau 😅

Also the community is a set of add-ons, not a fork or a different distribution - Odoo (the company) still drives the evolution of the core software. You can move from Community to Enterprise and vice-versa.

And finally, I don't think there's much tension between the community and the company.

Sometimes they developed similar features, sometimes not at all.

So Odoo Enterprise and Odoo Community are not 'entirely different things', and many companies will implement both Odoo Enterprise and Odoo Community in different situations (and different budgets).

We were not 'forced' to keep the core open, we chose to! We like open source, we just couldn't live off it. Not 'all new apps' are in the Enterprise code base.

OCA 'reverse engineered' nothing, they just developed what they felt was needed in the open source ecosystem.

LOL what are you talking about? We became open core because we had 3 months left of cash and were going to close shop if we did not change the business model 😅 The CEO has >50% shares and does basically what pleases him - the investors don't 'pressure' anything into him.