This is a classic divide and conquer strategy. Highlight and elevate contrarian views, claim there's a divide, and then relentlessly try to manufacture one so that they can roll back the rights of the entire group. This was the entire purpose of the LGB Alliance in the UK.

I'm not letting the new york times tell me what to do with my pumpkin hole

This is a whole lot

Feckless mewling

Ok no thank you

Why are you even entertaining this as a legitimate question? (I mean, we know why but damn)

It's like, I want queer representation in government, but looks who's representing us: McBride, Buttigieg, Torres. Each one worse than the next, and each one willing to sell us out because a Dem consultant or some lobby told them to.

How is Pete so bad at *gestures broadly*?

Scratch a liberal, and a fascist bleeds

Cool, now I get to report her entire account for child sexual exploitation 👍

Which means they are nowhere close to a deal

Graham Linehan is a rabid transphobe who has, by his own admission, called for violence against trans women. That's the free speech you're trying to give the "both sides" argument.