Blueberry started harassing Ralvious after this document was made, and Ralvious had no mentions of knowing Jose before the acts mentioned in this document.

This is in no way defending either of them, only proving that Ralvious has a flimsy defense.

By pointing out that the doc made on you was made before any claims of grooming or mentions of Jose or Blueberry, I merely wanted to focus on the fact that, regardless of those events being true or false, it doesn't erase your own actions.

They're both guilty of their respective actions.

This is not to say I think he's innocent. I don't. I am however still willing to hear your side out, as I want all perspectives to be heard first.

I don't aim to harass Ralvious. I would have not even created this account if he owned up to his actions. Instead, he feigns innocence, started with claiming he was innocent, and now hiding behind yet another new excuse. That is the sole reason for my posts. Awareness and acknowledgement of truth.

So no, "But he was groomed!" is not an excuse here.
The document came out far before any mentions of him being groomed, and now he's trying to use that as a scapegoat for his actions, even if the timeline doesn't line up whatsoever.
He just finds a new excuse whenever his defenses become flimsy.

I am not affiliated with the accounts sharing my post around but am grateful that they're spreading awareness, thank you.
Ralvious is not innocent. Regardless of him having been groomed or not, regardless of those accusations being true, he's a perpetrator too. A victim can become an abuser.

You are afraid of me because you know I'm right.
You are guilty of the accusations. You've hurt people, and will keep hurting people. You're lying about your innocence just to make yourself look better, but the truth will come out one way or the other.

If Frag, or 'Ralvious', was innocent, then I wouldn't have been blocked so quickly.
An innocent person doesn't immediately block someone accusing them, with document proof, that they're a p€dophile.
An innocent person would have the resources to refute false accusations. Notice how he never does?

This is proof that these claims aren't a new thing. He's been doing this for years, and will keep doing it. This doc originally exposed him, and a group after the first had also allegedly found out that he'd been saving MORE illegal content.

"WHY POST AN OUTDATED DOCUMENT?"
Because that's enough proof that he's been doing this before a certain point. The people behind the original doc didn't want to keep having anything to do with him, but he wouldn't shut up and would constantly victimize himself as if he wasn't GUILTY of these acts

Do not listen to what @alicebrightstar.bsky.social or @yapperkrowklassic.bsky.social are saying.
They're actively lying to you.
I mean it when I say this, Frag is not and will never be innocent. He traumatized people, and due to the gallery's contents he'd be considered an actual CRIMINAL.

Pepper was only known after Frag had bought a commission from them, just to complain about the contents.
Though it's suspicious to complain of an upskirt when you commissioned an account that, quickly scrolling through it, is FILLED with that sort of art, AND the user has a 🔞 icon on their profile.

Blueberrie wasn't in the situation either, nor had they been mentioned by Frag any time before the document.
Even if they're relevant now, they weren't at the beginning, meaning that they cannot be blamed for Frag's initial accusations either.

Jose wasn't around when this document was created so he couldn't have groomed Frag into saving the first 516 images, commissioning someone to draw a teen character in weird situations, or requesting upskirt art from unsuspecting users.

He forced people to participate in his fetishes, while downplaying them as either "not fetishes" (Cookie Snacks "not being vore") or "comforts" (Bubblegum blowing, which he confesses at one point that it "aroused him" despite claiming it was a comfort in someone else's dms).