burgee3.bsky.social
@burgee3.bsky.social
Cancelling another woman who disagrees on one subject is not the way forward & will get neither side any further than the other.
April 26, 2025 at 9:04 PM
None of us know a skin we’re not in. Unlike Willoughby, it’s why I’m not consistently racist. As a DV survivor, I wouldn’t question other women’s validity, Willoughby does. Rowling is a staunch campaigner for women’s rights & safety, with left wing politics like Willoughby. Both should talk & listen
April 26, 2025 at 9:02 PM
Willoughby has been openly racist on many occasions. Also punches down of women that she deems unattractive. Consistently tells women ‘they look like men’. Questions women’s accounts of domestic violence. Nice.
April 26, 2025 at 8:57 PM
Whilst I don’t agree with Rowlings reaction, I certainly don’t agree with Willoughby either. Blaming ‘frumpy’ women for the court decision (a sexist comment if ever there was one) - sharing incorrect info on Rowling being neighbours with the judge - are you expecting her to be cancelled too?
April 26, 2025 at 8:45 PM
Rowling’s last tax bill, 47 million. That pays almost half of the 100 million NHS bill on gender transitions per year. She also pays for women’s refuge homes, intervening in certain death. We have to stop this hate campaign on both sides.
April 26, 2025 at 8:40 PM
That’s vile.
April 19, 2025 at 8:12 PM
We are such a long way from male accountability, which is why I agreed with you. The socialisation of boys in our patriarchal societies must change before anything else can. The lack of trans male voices in this is testament to that fact.
April 19, 2025 at 2:14 PM
Willoughby isn’t interested in dialogue. Calling women frumps, lying about Rowling being a neighbour of the Judge - not helping. Blocking & silencing female voices like mine that just want a dialogue & better understanding, protection for both parties, not helping.
April 19, 2025 at 2:09 PM
On the whole, agreed but must admit that I’m ignorant on trans women’s offending rates. According to parliament information it’s 18 times higher than a biological woman for violent offences. Right now, the way forward is dialogue.
April 19, 2025 at 2:06 PM
It’s not a clear subject. Non-binary, self identifying with no treatment (switching when it suits) all fall under the same umbrella as trans. You can’t give one different rules. That puts women (already murdered by a known male every 6 minutes) at risk.
April 16, 2025 at 6:56 PM
Thank you. It’s much appreciated. I’m left wing, don’t want to see any group of people suffer. Can’t pretend to imagine how awful it is feeling that you’re born in the wrong body. I also don’t have to imagine how it feels to be violently abused by a biological male. Female safety is a real concern.
April 16, 2025 at 1:19 PM
I can assure you I haven’t. Men have been a danger to women since day 1. I don’t think trans women are more dangerous than men. I never said that was the case. You just haven’t bothered to correctly read it.
April 16, 2025 at 1:08 PM
You’ve not read what I’ve said correctly, as I never said that. I talked about gender based violence.
April 16, 2025 at 1:04 PM
Agreed. Where do you draw the line though? Who gets to say if you’re trans or not? Where does that leave non-binary’s? It’s become an umbrella that encompasses so much. Then there is the most basic of all, do biological women have a right to feel comfortable?
April 16, 2025 at 1:00 PM
As a woman, I can confirm that’s not true. The stats reflect that. I’ve sat & debated girlfriends coming down either side of the debate. I’ve also got a 14 year old daughter - after using school gender neutral toilets for a year, she’s totally changed her mind on the subject.
April 16, 2025 at 12:55 PM
Unfortunately, I agree. I also agree to trying to protect 51% of the population. Gender violence is on the increase. I’m more than aware of the violent issues trans woman also face. So what’s the answer? That’s a genuine question. I’m not anti-trans, I’m pro-female safety.
April 16, 2025 at 12:32 PM
So you’re comparing this to over 400 years of slavery, followed by Jim Crow, followed by the 13th Amendment - for the fact that you’re born with melanin, to this? Not helpful, especially from a European.
April 16, 2025 at 12:25 PM
It’s a voting issue. The vast majority want single spaces for biological women. Trans women are not at fault, men are. They are murdering women at a rate of 1 every 6 minutes. Self identifying as female whilst keeping male genitalia isn’t helping either.
April 16, 2025 at 12:22 PM
This ruling aligns with the vast majority. Women are under siege from the right who want to take away a woman’s choice & the left that call them bigots for wanting their own spaces. The only way forward is to protect trans people with their safe spaces.
April 16, 2025 at 11:48 AM
A right wing, straight, homophobic, transphobic black man is still going to get stopped & searched, more likely to die in custody, his kids get marked down 6 points in school, serve 17% longer in prison. Racism & transphobia, both vile, not the same though.
March 27, 2025 at 11:21 AM
He’s going after everyone, critical race theory is out of the window. Diversity caused the DC plane crash. No one that isn’t white & straight is safe.
January 31, 2025 at 10:15 PM
I can’t believe the ADL is publicly backing Musk. People that chant ‘free Palestine’ are labelled antisemitic, but a Nazi salute is ok?
January 24, 2025 at 11:12 AM
Agreed, but watching her sitting around with the Tates, giggling & agreeing that wanting a female leader makes you ‘gay’, proves that she probably believes in nothing & just follows shock factor speech.
December 31, 2024 at 9:19 PM
Get in touch. You can’t change anything whilst not at the table.
December 19, 2024 at 4:53 PM
She’s too left for the general population. Just as the UK wouldn’t vote Labour until a man who is very much not Labour - was leading. People get scared, lord knows why - no one could have shafted countries like Trump & the Tories.
December 19, 2024 at 4:49 PM