@buermann.bsky.social
Plz follow @ap.brid.gy to cross-post to the Fediverse so I can follow you there instead of another VC funded socmed toy destined for the enshittification uniformly demanded by equity and eyeball markets.
@buermann.mastodon.social.ap.brid.gy
@buermann.mastodon.social.ap.brid.gy
Reposted
"We built the torment nexus to warn about the ethical implications of building the torment nexus."
— these assholes, every single time.
("gift" link)
— these assholes, every single time.
("gift" link)
Why Stanford Researchers Tried to Create a ‘Gaydar’ Machine (Published 2017)
www.nytimes.com
December 12, 2025 at 3:01 AM
"We built the torment nexus to warn about the ethical implications of building the torment nexus."
— these assholes, every single time.
("gift" link)
— these assholes, every single time.
("gift" link)
he's just using charlie kirk as an excuse to stay in and pay people to play his video games
December 11, 2025 at 5:57 PM
he's just using charlie kirk as an excuse to stay in and pay people to play his video games
Reposted
The very next year, SCOTUS heard US v Thind, in which a South Asian Sikh insisted he was technically part of the Caucasian race based on language and anthropology etc.
The court said, ha ha, no, by "Caucasian" we mean white.
The court said, ha ha, no, by "Caucasian" we mean white.
December 11, 2025 at 2:00 PM
The very next year, SCOTUS heard US v Thind, in which a South Asian Sikh insisted he was technically part of the Caucasian race based on language and anthropology etc.
The court said, ha ha, no, by "Caucasian" we mean white.
The court said, ha ha, no, by "Caucasian" we mean white.
Reposted
In the 1922 case of US v Ozawa, a Japanese immigrant to the US essentially pointed to the color of his skin and said, look, I'm white, I should be eligible for naturalization.
But the court, embracing the new "science" of race, said, no, by white we mean "Caucasian"
But the court, embracing the new "science" of race, said, no, by white we mean "Caucasian"
December 11, 2025 at 1:57 PM
In the 1922 case of US v Ozawa, a Japanese immigrant to the US essentially pointed to the color of his skin and said, look, I'm white, I should be eligible for naturalization.
But the court, embracing the new "science" of race, said, no, by white we mean "Caucasian"
But the court, embracing the new "science" of race, said, no, by white we mean "Caucasian"