One point I take issue with: dismissal of potential Epstein links with intelligence agencies as a conspiracy. >
One point I take issue with: dismissal of potential Epstein links with intelligence agencies as a conspiracy. >
Cause maximal distraction, so that while attention is (rightly) focused on immediate humanitarian issues, strategic elements continue with their attack on rule of law, gutting institutions, and undermining free elections (everything, everywhere, all at once)
Cause maximal distraction, so that while attention is (rightly) focused on immediate humanitarian issues, strategic elements continue with their attack on rule of law, gutting institutions, and undermining free elections (everything, everywhere, all at once)
Skillsets needed by investigators include intelligence analysis, criminal justice detection, law, psychology, anthropology, the humanities, as well as science and engineering. The implications of either situation would be profoundly important, although the response might be quite different. /END
Skillsets needed by investigators include intelligence analysis, criminal justice detection, law, psychology, anthropology, the humanities, as well as science and engineering. The implications of either situation would be profoundly important, although the response might be quite different. /END
the possible characteristics of the source phenomenon. An open-minded investigation that considers the rogue group possibility would resemble one considering NHI. In the latter case, anthropomorphic assumptions about behavior or intentions are best avoided.
the possible characteristics of the source phenomenon. An open-minded investigation that considers the rogue group possibility would resemble one considering NHI. In the latter case, anthropomorphic assumptions about behavior or intentions are best avoided.
"National security" and "just human technology" arguments, often used to deflect investigation should carry no weight in deciding whether to proceed. Both mimicry and use of culturally-knowledgeable deception, such as use of "national security" procedures, must be included in
"National security" and "just human technology" arguments, often used to deflect investigation should carry no weight in deciding whether to proceed. Both mimicry and use of culturally-knowledgeable deception, such as use of "national security" procedures, must be included in
nor favor a particular state nor conduct reconnaissance of typical targets nor be confined to citizens of one country nor be confined to a particular continent. "National security" might have no particular meaning or importance to such a group.
nor favor a particular state nor conduct reconnaissance of typical targets nor be confined to citizens of one country nor be confined to a particular continent. "National security" might have no particular meaning or importance to such a group.
they would not necessarily debrief military witnesses nor require NDAs nor test only in military reservations nor avoid testing on unwitting military or civilians nor show a conventional technology development trail nor deploy the technology in military conflict nor avoid such deployment
they would not necessarily debrief military witnesses nor require NDAs nor test only in military reservations nor avoid testing on unwitting military or civilians nor show a conventional technology development trail nor deploy the technology in military conflict nor avoid such deployment
of an intelligence service, military unit, or commercial entity are unhelpful or even misleading. Such a group would not necessarily follow normal procedures for "black projects" or testing of new technology. For example,
of an intelligence service, military unit, or commercial entity are unhelpful or even misleading. Such a group would not necessarily follow normal procedures for "black projects" or testing of new technology. For example,
This is different from the commonly mentioned "rogue group within the CIA or DoD or government contractor." Such a group cannot be assumed to be acting on behalf of a state or a subdivision of a state. Its motives must be approached as an unknown. Arguments that assume normal behavior
This is different from the commonly mentioned "rogue group within the CIA or DoD or government contractor." Such a group cannot be assumed to be acting on behalf of a state or a subdivision of a state. Its motives must be approached as an unknown. Arguments that assume normal behavior
a rogue group of actors who are effectively unaccountable to any legal authority must be considered as a possible source of SOME clearly anomalous UAP encounters.
a rogue group of actors who are effectively unaccountable to any legal authority must be considered as a possible source of SOME clearly anomalous UAP encounters.
the US experience with anomalous drones over the past 5 years in New Jersey, the West, and defense installations like Langley (where an entire aircraft unit was forced to relocate) and elsewhere in the world,
the US experience with anomalous drones over the past 5 years in New Jersey, the West, and defense installations like Langley (where an entire aircraft unit was forced to relocate) and elsewhere in the world,