@bsbafflesbrains.bsky.social
November 13, 2025 at 2:11 AM
S tatus Quo
C hampion
H elping
U s
M aintain
E vil
R epublican Majority
AOC Senate 2028
We the people don't want status quo ante tRUMP we want progressive change for the people.
C hampion
H elping
U s
M aintain
E vil
R epublican Majority
AOC Senate 2028
We the people don't want status quo ante tRUMP we want progressive change for the people.
November 13, 2025 at 2:03 AM
S tatus Quo
C hampion
H elping
U s
M aintain
E vil
R epublican Majority
AOC Senate 2028
We the people don't want status quo ante tRUMP we want progressive change for the people.
C hampion
H elping
U s
M aintain
E vil
R epublican Majority
AOC Senate 2028
We the people don't want status quo ante tRUMP we want progressive change for the people.
November 13, 2025 at 2:00 AM
Should there not be more Maga tRump defectors NOW?
November 13, 2025 at 1:53 AM
Should there not be more Maga tRump defectors NOW?
Soooo no other Republican Congresscritters are signing the discharge petition? There really should be some who will not protect TyranasaurusRump anymore.
November 13, 2025 at 1:51 AM
Soooo no other Republican Congresscritters are signing the discharge petition? There really should be some who will not protect TyranasaurusRump anymore.
Seems like the history of the Senate filibuster rule since the 80's shows that for Congress to enact a law that helps the people 60 votes is unattainable but lowering tax rates for the rich + removing regulations that protect consumers only takes 51 votes. We still have a two party/one oligarchy sys
November 11, 2025 at 2:24 AM
Seems like the history of the Senate filibuster rule since the 80's shows that for Congress to enact a law that helps the people 60 votes is unattainable but lowering tax rates for the rich + removing regulations that protect consumers only takes 51 votes. We still have a two party/one oligarchy sys
Seems like the history of the Senate filibuster rule since the 80's shows that for Congress to enact a law that helps the people 60 votes is unattainable but lowering tax rates for the rich + removing regulations that protect consumers only takes 51 votes. We still have a two party/one oligarchy sys
November 11, 2025 at 2:10 AM
Seems like the history of the Senate filibuster rule since the 80's shows that for Congress to enact a law that helps the people 60 votes is unattainable but lowering tax rates for the rich + removing regulations that protect consumers only takes 51 votes. We still have a two party/one oligarchy sys
Seems like the history of the Senate filibuster rule since the 80's shows that for Congress to enact a law that helps the people 60 votes is unattainable but lowering tax rates for the rich + removing regulations that protect consumers only takes 51 votes. We still have a two party/one oligarchy sys
November 11, 2025 at 2:06 AM
Seems like the history of the Senate filibuster rule since the 80's shows that for Congress to enact a law that helps the people 60 votes is unattainable but lowering tax rates for the rich + removing regulations that protect consumers only takes 51 votes. We still have a two party/one oligarchy sys
Seems like the history of the Senate filibuster rule since the 80's shows that for Congress to enact a law that helps the people 60 votes is unattainable but lowering tax rates for the rich + removing regulations that protect consumers only takes 51 votes. We still have a two party/one oligarchy sys
November 11, 2025 at 2:02 AM
Seems like the history of the Senate filibuster rule since the 80's shows that for Congress to enact a law that helps the people 60 votes is unattainable but lowering tax rates for the rich + removing regulations that protect consumers only takes 51 votes. We still have a two party/one oligarchy sys
Seems like the history of the Senate filibuster rule since the 80's shows that for Congress to enact a law that helps the people 60 votes is unattainable but lowering tax rates for the rich + removing regulations that protect consumers only takes 51 votes. We still have a two party/one oligarchy sys
November 11, 2025 at 1:58 AM
Seems like the history of the Senate filibuster rule since the 80's shows that for Congress to enact a law that helps the people 60 votes is unattainable but lowering tax rates for the rich + removing regulations that protect consumers only takes 51 votes. We still have a two party/one oligarchy sys
Seems like the history of the Senate filibuster rule since the 80's shows that for Congress to enact a law that helps the people 60 votes is unattainable but lowering tax rates for the rich + removing regulations that protect consumers only takes 51 votes. We still have a two party/one oligarchy sys
November 11, 2025 at 1:57 AM
Seems like the history of the Senate filibuster rule since the 80's shows that for Congress to enact a law that helps the people 60 votes is unattainable but lowering tax rates for the rich + removing regulations that protect consumers only takes 51 votes. We still have a two party/one oligarchy sys
Seems like the history of the Senate filibuster rule since the 80's shows that for Congress to enact a law that helps the people 60 votes is unattainable but lowering tax rates for the rich + removing regulations that protect consumers only takes 51 votes. We still have a two party/one oligarchy sys
November 11, 2025 at 1:54 AM
Seems like the history of the Senate filibuster rule since the 80's shows that for Congress to enact a law that helps the people 60 votes is unattainable but lowering tax rates for the rich + removing regulations that protect consumers only takes 51 votes. We still have a two party/one oligarchy sys
Seems like the history of the Senate filibuster rule since the 80's shows that for Congress to enact a law that helps the people 60 votes is unattainable but lowering tax rates for the rich + removing regulations that protect consumers only takes 51 votes. We still have a two party/one oligarchy sys
November 11, 2025 at 1:53 AM
Seems like the history of the Senate filibuster rule since the 80's shows that for Congress to enact a law that helps the people 60 votes is unattainable but lowering tax rates for the rich + removing regulations that protect consumers only takes 51 votes. We still have a two party/one oligarchy sys
Seems like the history of the Senate filibuster rule since the 80's shows that for Congress to enact a law that helps the people 60 votes is unattainable but lowering tax rates for the rich + removing regulations that protect consumers only takes 51 votes. We still have a two party/one oligarchy sys
November 11, 2025 at 1:53 AM
Seems like the history of the Senate filibuster rule since the 80's shows that for Congress to enact a law that helps the people 60 votes is unattainable but lowering tax rates for the rich + removing regulations that protect consumers only takes 51 votes. We still have a two party/one oligarchy sys
Seems like the history of the Senate filibuster rule since the 80's shows that for Congress to enact a law that helps the people 60 votes is unattainable but lowering tax rates for the rich + removing regulations that protect consumers only takes 51 votes. We still have a two party/one oligarchy sys
November 11, 2025 at 1:52 AM
Seems like the history of the Senate filibuster rule since the 80's shows that for Congress to enact a law that helps the people 60 votes is unattainable but lowering tax rates for the rich + removing regulations that protect consumers only takes 51 votes. We still have a two party/one oligarchy sys
Seems like the history of the Senate filibuster rule since the 80's shows that for Congress to enact a law that helps the people 60 votes is unattainable but lowering tax rates for the rich + removing regulations that protect consumers only takes 51 votes. We still have a two party/one oligarchy sys
November 11, 2025 at 1:51 AM
Seems like the history of the Senate filibuster rule since the 80's shows that for Congress to enact a law that helps the people 60 votes is unattainable but lowering tax rates for the rich + removing regulations that protect consumers only takes 51 votes. We still have a two party/one oligarchy sys
S tatus Quo
C hampion
H elping
U s
M aintain
E vil
R epublican Majority
AOC Senate 2028
We the people don't want status quo ante tRUMP we want progressive change for the people.
p.s. Bernie is Independent; you can count the progressive D's on one hand.
November 9, 2025 at 7:15 PM
C hampion
H elping
U s
M aintain
E vil
R epublican Majority
AOC Senate 2028
We the people don't want status quo ante tRUMP we want progressive change for the people.
p.s. Bernie is Independent; you can count the progressive D's on one hand.
November 9, 2025 at 7:15 PM
November 10, 2025 at 2:17 PM
S tatus Quo
C hampion
H elping
U s
M aintain
E vil
R epublican Majority
AOC Senate 2028
We the people don't want status quo ante tRUMP we want progressive change for the people.
p.s. Bernie is Independent; you can count the progressive D's on one hand.
November 9, 2025 at 7:15 PM
C hampion
H elping
U s
M aintain
E vil
R epublican Majority
AOC Senate 2028
We the people don't want status quo ante tRUMP we want progressive change for the people.
p.s. Bernie is Independent; you can count the progressive D's on one hand.
November 9, 2025 at 7:15 PM
S tatus Quo
C hampion
H elping
U s
M aintain
E vil
R epublican Majority
AOC Senate 2028
We the people don't want status quo ante tRUMP we want progressive change for the people.
p.s. Bernie is Independent; you can count the progressive D's on one hand.
November 9, 2025 at 7:15 PM
C hampion
H elping
U s
M aintain
E vil
R epublican Majority
AOC Senate 2028
We the people don't want status quo ante tRUMP we want progressive change for the people.
p.s. Bernie is Independent; you can count the progressive D's on one hand.
November 9, 2025 at 7:15 PM
November 10, 2025 at 2:16 PM
S tatus Quo
C hampion
H elping
U s
M aintain
E vil
R epublican Majority
AOC Senate 2028
We the people don't want status quo ante tRUMP we want progressive change for the people.
p.s. Bernie is Independent; you can count the progressive D's on one hand.
November 9, 2025 at 7:15 PM
C hampion
H elping
U s
M aintain
E vil
R epublican Majority
AOC Senate 2028
We the people don't want status quo ante tRUMP we want progressive change for the people.
p.s. Bernie is Independent; you can count the progressive D's on one hand.
November 9, 2025 at 7:15 PM
S tatus Quo
C hampion
H elping
U s
M aintain
E vil
R epublican Majority
AOC Senate 2028
We the people don't want status quo ante tRUMP we want progressive change for the people.
p.s. Bernie is Independent; you can count the progressive D's on one hand.
C hampion
H elping
U s
M aintain
E vil
R epublican Majority
AOC Senate 2028
We the people don't want status quo ante tRUMP we want progressive change for the people.
p.s. Bernie is Independent; you can count the progressive D's on one hand.
November 10, 2025 at 4:28 AM
S tatus Quo
C hampion
H elping
U s
M aintain
E vil
R epublican Majority
AOC Senate 2028
We the people don't want status quo ante tRUMP we want progressive change for the people.
p.s. Bernie is Independent; you can count the progressive D's on one hand.
C hampion
H elping
U s
M aintain
E vil
R epublican Majority
AOC Senate 2028
We the people don't want status quo ante tRUMP we want progressive change for the people.
p.s. Bernie is Independent; you can count the progressive D's on one hand.
S tatus Quo
C hampion
H elping
U s
M aintain
E vil
R epublican Majority
AOC Senate 2028
We the people don't want status quo ante tRUMP we want progressive change for the people.
p.s. Bernie is Independent; you can count the progressive D's on one hand.
C hampion
H elping
U s
M aintain
E vil
R epublican Majority
AOC Senate 2028
We the people don't want status quo ante tRUMP we want progressive change for the people.
p.s. Bernie is Independent; you can count the progressive D's on one hand.
November 10, 2025 at 4:24 AM
S tatus Quo
C hampion
H elping
U s
M aintain
E vil
R epublican Majority
AOC Senate 2028
We the people don't want status quo ante tRUMP we want progressive change for the people.
p.s. Bernie is Independent; you can count the progressive D's on one hand.
C hampion
H elping
U s
M aintain
E vil
R epublican Majority
AOC Senate 2028
We the people don't want status quo ante tRUMP we want progressive change for the people.
p.s. Bernie is Independent; you can count the progressive D's on one hand.