Bruce Knuteson
@bruceknuteson.bsky.social
CEO, Kn-X. Personal website: https://www.bruceknuteson.com
The Financial Times naturally (ssrn.com/abstract=461...) fails to mention this ridiculous pattern of overnight and intraday returns in 4iG's stock that the FT can't innocuously explain.
November 13, 2025 at 7:15 PM
The Financial Times naturally (ssrn.com/abstract=461...) fails to mention this ridiculous pattern of overnight and intraday returns in 4iG's stock that the FT can't innocuously explain.
"Quiet" is all Warren Buffett and the Financial Times have ever been about this strikingly suspicious return pattern in Berkshire Hathaway's stock that nobody can innocuously explain (ssrn.com/abstract=461...).
November 11, 2025 at 2:31 PM
"Quiet" is all Warren Buffett and the Financial Times have ever been about this strikingly suspicious return pattern in Berkshire Hathaway's stock that nobody can innocuously explain (ssrn.com/abstract=461...).
The Financial Times continues to studiously hide the main story behind the Strategy saga. The Strategy saga is all about MSTR's price being wrong, and you can't understand that without understanding the trading that caused this plot. It's a short story: ssrn.com/abstract=461...
November 10, 2025 at 2:23 PM
The Financial Times continues to studiously hide the main story behind the Strategy saga. The Strategy saga is all about MSTR's price being wrong, and you can't understand that without understanding the trading that caused this plot. It's a short story: ssrn.com/abstract=461...
You and Vox can stop Musk whenever you like simply by clearly and honestly reporting this pattern of overnight and intraday returns in Tesla's stock that nobody can innocuously explain. Just improve on the FT's poor attempt (www.ft.com/content/9cc3..., cf. bruceknuteson.github.io/spy-day-and-...).
November 8, 2025 at 6:55 PM
You and Vox can stop Musk whenever you like simply by clearly and honestly reporting this pattern of overnight and intraday returns in Tesla's stock that nobody can innocuously explain. Just improve on the FT's poor attempt (www.ft.com/content/9cc3..., cf. bruceknuteson.github.io/spy-day-and-...).
Speaking of swindling, nobody has yet clearly reported this strikingly suspicious pattern of overnight and intraday returns in Tesla's stock that nobody can innocuously explain (ssrn.com/abstract=389...).
November 8, 2025 at 5:11 PM
Speaking of swindling, nobody has yet clearly reported this strikingly suspicious pattern of overnight and intraday returns in Tesla's stock that nobody can innocuously explain (ssrn.com/abstract=389...).
Nobody has yet clearly reported this strikingly suspicious pattern of overnight and intraday returns in Tesla's stock that nobody can innocuously explain. The Financial Times' attempt (www.ft.com/content/9cc3...) was predictably pathetic (bruceknuteson.github.io/spy-day-and-...).
November 8, 2025 at 5:07 PM
Nobody has yet clearly reported this strikingly suspicious pattern of overnight and intraday returns in Tesla's stock that nobody can innocuously explain. The Financial Times' attempt (www.ft.com/content/9cc3...) was predictably pathetic (bruceknuteson.github.io/spy-day-and-...).
The market manipulation described in ssrn.com/abstract=461... is the only plausible explanation for the rich patterns of day and night returns seen in many stocks. The straightforward interpretation of this plot is that this market manipulation *caused* most of the positive returns to Tesla's stock.
November 8, 2025 at 4:57 PM
The market manipulation described in ssrn.com/abstract=461... is the only plausible explanation for the rich patterns of day and night returns seen in many stocks. The straightforward interpretation of this plot is that this market manipulation *caused* most of the positive returns to Tesla's stock.
The Guardian continues to hide this strikingly suspicious pattern of overnight and intraday returns in Tesla's stock that nobody can innocuously explain (ssrn.com/abstract=389...).
November 8, 2025 at 4:43 PM
The Guardian continues to hide this strikingly suspicious pattern of overnight and intraday returns in Tesla's stock that nobody can innocuously explain (ssrn.com/abstract=389...).
Tesla's stock displays a strikingly suspicious pattern of overnight and intraday returns that few people know about and nobody can innocuously explain, as noted by the FT (www.ft.com/content/9cc3...) and Forbes (www.forbes.com/sites/hershs...).
November 8, 2025 at 4:40 PM
Tesla's stock displays a strikingly suspicious pattern of overnight and intraday returns that few people know about and nobody can innocuously explain, as noted by the FT (www.ft.com/content/9cc3...) and Forbes (www.forbes.com/sites/hershs...).
A bit more context: Tesla's stock displays a strikingly suspicious pattern of overnight and intraday returns that few people know about and nobody can innocuously explain, as noted by the FT (www.ft.com/content/9cc3...) and Forbes (www.forbes.com/sites/hershs...).
November 8, 2025 at 4:30 PM
A bit more context: Tesla's stock displays a strikingly suspicious pattern of overnight and intraday returns that few people know about and nobody can innocuously explain, as noted by the FT (www.ft.com/content/9cc3...) and Forbes (www.forbes.com/sites/hershs...).
The New York Times still has not reported this strikingly suspicious pattern of overnight and intraday returns in Tesla's stock that nobody can innocuously explain (ssrn.com/abstract=389...).
November 8, 2025 at 4:26 PM
The New York Times still has not reported this strikingly suspicious pattern of overnight and intraday returns in Tesla's stock that nobody can innocuously explain (ssrn.com/abstract=389...).
Tesla's stock displays a strikingly suspicious pattern of overnight and intraday returns that few people know about and nobody can innocuously explain, as noted by the FT (www.ft.com/content/9cc3..., cf. bruceknuteson.github.io/spy-day-and-...) and Forbes (www.forbes.com/sites/hershs...).
November 8, 2025 at 4:21 PM
Tesla's stock displays a strikingly suspicious pattern of overnight and intraday returns that few people know about and nobody can innocuously explain, as noted by the FT (www.ft.com/content/9cc3..., cf. bruceknuteson.github.io/spy-day-and-...) and Forbes (www.forbes.com/sites/hershs...).
More than all the positive returns to Tesla's stock strikingly suspiciously and almost certainly nefariously came overnight, when the market is illiquid (ssrn.com/abstract=461...). I am sure your fellow MPs, your constituents, and your followers would be interested to learn this suspicious fact.
November 8, 2025 at 4:13 PM
More than all the positive returns to Tesla's stock strikingly suspiciously and almost certainly nefariously came overnight, when the market is illiquid (ssrn.com/abstract=461...). I am sure your fellow MPs, your constituents, and your followers would be interested to learn this suspicious fact.
Speaking of scams, nearly all the positive returns to Meta's stock have strikingly suspiciously come overnight, when the market is illiquid (ssrn.com/abstract=389...).
November 7, 2025 at 10:52 PM
Speaking of scams, nearly all the positive returns to Meta's stock have strikingly suspiciously come overnight, when the market is illiquid (ssrn.com/abstract=389...).
Nobody (including Musk) has yet made the hard but necessary choice to widely and honestly report this strikingly suspicious pattern of overnight and intraday returns in Tesla's stock and the apparent absence of any plausible innocuous explanation for it (ssrn.com/abstract=461...).
November 7, 2025 at 6:59 PM
Nobody (including Musk) has yet made the hard but necessary choice to widely and honestly report this strikingly suspicious pattern of overnight and intraday returns in Tesla's stock and the apparent absence of any plausible innocuous explanation for it (ssrn.com/abstract=461...).
The Washington Post's continued hiding of this glaringly obviously problematic return pattern in Nvidia's stock (ssrn.com/abstract=461...) enables this bonkers spending.
November 7, 2025 at 6:10 PM
The Washington Post's continued hiding of this glaringly obviously problematic return pattern in Nvidia's stock (ssrn.com/abstract=461...) enables this bonkers spending.
The Financial Times yet again passes on the opportunity to drive home the point that Tesla's stock displays a strikingly suspicious return pattern that nobody can innocuously explain (ssrn.com/abstract=461...).
November 6, 2025 at 11:33 PM
The Financial Times yet again passes on the opportunity to drive home the point that Tesla's stock displays a strikingly suspicious return pattern that nobody can innocuously explain (ssrn.com/abstract=461...).
NBC News continues to hide this strikingly suspicious return pattern in Tesla's stock that nobody can innocuously explain. My article "Nothing to See Here" (ssrn.com/abstract=461...) explains why.
November 6, 2025 at 11:10 PM
NBC News continues to hide this strikingly suspicious return pattern in Tesla's stock that nobody can innocuously explain. My article "Nothing to See Here" (ssrn.com/abstract=461...) explains why.
The Washington Post continues to hide this strikingly suspicious return pattern in Tesla's stock that nobody can innocuously explain. My article "Nothing to See Here" (ssrn.com/abstract=461...) explains why.
November 6, 2025 at 11:04 PM
The Washington Post continues to hide this strikingly suspicious return pattern in Tesla's stock that nobody can innocuously explain. My article "Nothing to See Here" (ssrn.com/abstract=461...) explains why.
Much of the wealth accumulated by the world's richest has strikingly suspiciously come overnight, when the market is illiquid (ssrn.com/abstract=461...).
Disturbingly, nobody has been able to innocuously explain this.
Even more disturbingly, nobody has widely reported it.
Disturbingly, nobody has been able to innocuously explain this.
Even more disturbingly, nobody has widely reported it.
November 6, 2025 at 7:55 PM
Much of the wealth accumulated by the world's richest has strikingly suspiciously come overnight, when the market is illiquid (ssrn.com/abstract=461...).
Disturbingly, nobody has been able to innocuously explain this.
Even more disturbingly, nobody has widely reported it.
Disturbingly, nobody has been able to innocuously explain this.
Even more disturbingly, nobody has widely reported it.
Speaking of scams, nearly all the positive returns to Meta's stock have suspiciously come overnight, when the market is illiquid (ssrn.com/abstract=461...).
November 6, 2025 at 7:26 PM
Speaking of scams, nearly all the positive returns to Meta's stock have suspiciously come overnight, when the market is illiquid (ssrn.com/abstract=461...).
The Financial Times still has not reported the strikingly suspicious patterns of overnight and intraday returns with no apparent innocuous explanation in most hyperscalers' stocks (ssrn.com/abstract=461...). The FT's silence helps enable the shockingly large capital expenditures it makes fun of.
November 6, 2025 at 5:45 PM
The Financial Times still has not reported the strikingly suspicious patterns of overnight and intraday returns with no apparent innocuous explanation in most hyperscalers' stocks (ssrn.com/abstract=461...). The FT's silence helps enable the shockingly large capital expenditures it makes fun of.
Tesla shareholders to vote on Musk's $1tn pay deal without having been clearly alerted to this strikingly suspicious return pattern in Tesla's stock that nobody can innocuously explain (bruceknuteson.github.io/spy-day-and-...).
November 6, 2025 at 2:47 PM
Tesla shareholders to vote on Musk's $1tn pay deal without having been clearly alerted to this strikingly suspicious return pattern in Tesla's stock that nobody can innocuously explain (bruceknuteson.github.io/spy-day-and-...).
The stock of Icahn Enterprises displays a bizarre pattern of overnight and intraday returns. My article "Nothing to See Here" (ssrn.com/abstract=461...) explains why the WSJ has never mentioned it.
November 5, 2025 at 10:43 PM
The stock of Icahn Enterprises displays a bizarre pattern of overnight and intraday returns. My article "Nothing to See Here" (ssrn.com/abstract=461...) explains why the WSJ has never mentioned it.
This extreme concentration of wealth is indeed no accident. This strikingly suspicious return pattern that nobody has been able to innocuously explain in TSLA (ORCL, GOOGL, META, NVDA, AVGO, BRK-B, etc.) is what the market manipulation described in ssrn.com/abstract=328... looks like.
November 5, 2025 at 8:59 PM
This extreme concentration of wealth is indeed no accident. This strikingly suspicious return pattern that nobody has been able to innocuously explain in TSLA (ORCL, GOOGL, META, NVDA, AVGO, BRK-B, etc.) is what the market manipulation described in ssrn.com/abstract=328... looks like.