So perhaps they became also aware of stop impact and already had thoughts about it
So perhaps they became also aware of stop impact and already had thoughts about it
1) Less tram stops = less impact on car traffic (cars were not a consideration until 1950s, but a huge consideration from the 1950s)
2) The introduction of doors on trams (until 1950s we didn't have doors)
1) Less tram stops = less impact on car traffic (cars were not a consideration until 1950s, but a huge consideration from the 1950s)
2) The introduction of doors on trams (until 1950s we didn't have doors)
By 1960s tram speed dropped to 15,9–16,7 km/h and stayed like that until 2020.
Now it's been increased to over 18 km/h.
By 1960s tram speed dropped to 15,9–16,7 km/h and stayed like that until 2020.
Now it's been increased to over 18 km/h.
Yeees! :)
Yeees! :)
(Except the average speed on the network is sometimes published)
(Except the average speed on the network is sometimes published)
I'm always sad about the reduction of frequency in Riga (probably same in the US). Was trams every 4-5 mins, now it's 10-30 mins most of the day :D
I'm always sad about the reduction of frequency in Riga (probably same in the US). Was trams every 4-5 mins, now it's 10-30 mins most of the day :D
A detailed transport guide from 1936 exists and was auctioned, and I downloaded the few publicly available images.
A detailed transport guide from 1936 exists and was auctioned, and I downloaded the few publicly available images.
The number of stops from Freedom monument to Biķernieku iela has been reduced from 16 to 8.
(Though now I count bus stops, as the tram was moved to a parallel street. It has 10 stops for the same distance)
The number of stops from Freedom monument to Biķernieku iela has been reduced from 16 to 8.
(Though now I count bus stops, as the tram was moved to a parallel street. It has 10 stops for the same distance)
In 1930s stops were quite a bit closer, gradually more and more stops were made request stops, then in WWII and after WWII some stops were consolidated for efficiency to get the current 400-500m.
In 1930s stops were quite a bit closer, gradually more and more stops were made request stops, then in WWII and after WWII some stops were consolidated for efficiency to get the current 400-500m.
1) 300-300 to 600
2) 500-300-500 to 650-650
3) 300-300-300 to 450-450
1) 300-300 to 600
2) 500-300-500 to 650-650
3) 300-300-300 to 450-450
Tallinn - Riga bypass (station in a field near Salaspils) - Kaunas
Though by the current progress it seems that by 2030 only your mentioned sections (or until LV border) will be finished
Tallinn - Riga bypass (station in a field near Salaspils) - Kaunas
Though by the current progress it seems that by 2030 only your mentioned sections (or until LV border) will be finished
As well as:
1) No connection to Riga in phase 1 (and unsure if ever) (my biggest concern)
2) No link Kaunas-Vilnius
3) Unclear about Kaunas-PL border
As well as:
1) No connection to Riga in phase 1 (and unsure if ever) (my biggest concern)
2) No link Kaunas-Vilnius
3) Unclear about Kaunas-PL border
But a main issue is the lack of funding to build, as the coordinator points out.
But a main issue is the lack of funding to build, as the coordinator points out.