Brian P. McCullough
@brianpmccullough.bsky.social
Microsoft 365 (SharePoint) Solutions / Development • Full Stack • ASP.NET • NestJS • React
🏃♂️ ⚽️ 🏒 ⚾️ 👨👩👧 🏖 🇺🇲
🏃♂️ ⚽️ 🏒 ⚾️ 👨👩👧 🏖 🇺🇲
Does anyone have any guidance or gotchas related to using the newer(?) "Link" functionality vs the older "Link to a Document" content type in SPO?
The "Link to a Document" creates a ".aspx" file with specific content type, whereas the "Link" function creates a ".url" file using the default ctype.
The "Link to a Document" creates a ".aspx" file with specific content type, whereas the "Link" function creates a ".url" file using the default ctype.
May 31, 2025 at 12:29 AM
Does anyone have any guidance or gotchas related to using the newer(?) "Link" functionality vs the older "Link to a Document" content type in SPO?
The "Link to a Document" creates a ".aspx" file with specific content type, whereas the "Link" function creates a ".url" file using the default ctype.
The "Link to a Document" creates a ".aspx" file with specific content type, whereas the "Link" function creates a ".url" file using the default ctype.
Why does SP Rest API to get list item with managed metadata column (single) return the lookup id, rather than the text, for the Label property, but a multi-select managed metadata column returns the correct text value?
#sphelp
#sphelp
May 15, 2025 at 5:10 PM
Why does SP Rest API to get list item with managed metadata column (single) return the lookup id, rather than the text, for the Label property, but a multi-select managed metadata column returns the correct text value?
#sphelp
#sphelp
...and finally...
May 13, 2025 at 3:24 AM
...and finally...
Had to use a different endpoint.
Invoke-PnPSPRestMethod -Url "/_api/web/GetClientSideComponentsByComponentType(componentTypesString='7',supportedHostTypeValue=3,%20includeManifestActivatedTime=true)" -Method GET
It wants:
personalization: "Allow"
Like the good ole days with decompilers 😉
Invoke-PnPSPRestMethod -Url "/_api/web/GetClientSideComponentsByComponentType(componentTypesString='7',supportedHostTypeValue=3,%20includeManifestActivatedTime=true)" -Method GET
It wants:
personalization: "Allow"
Like the good ole days with decompilers 😉
May 13, 2025 at 2:33 AM
Had to use a different endpoint.
Invoke-PnPSPRestMethod -Url "/_api/web/GetClientSideComponentsByComponentType(componentTypesString='7',supportedHostTypeValue=3,%20includeManifestActivatedTime=true)" -Method GET
It wants:
personalization: "Allow"
Like the good ole days with decompilers 😉
Invoke-PnPSPRestMethod -Url "/_api/web/GetClientSideComponentsByComponentType(componentTypesString='7',supportedHostTypeValue=3,%20includeManifestActivatedTime=true)" -Method GET
It wants:
personalization: "Allow"
Like the good ole days with decompilers 😉
Will do, just looking for how to work with it... I don't see the "personalization" attribute as valid in the manifest (trying to place following the "cardSize" property) and unsure what value to set it to ("allow" for example?).
May 12, 2025 at 11:38 AM
Will do, just looking for how to work with it... I don't see the "personalization" attribute as valid in the manifest (trying to place following the "cardSize" property) and unsure what value to set it to ("allow" for example?).
GPT got one right!
git config htt p.postBuffer 524288000
git config htt p.postBuffer 524288000
January 24, 2025 at 4:54 PM
GPT got one right!
git config htt p.postBuffer 524288000
git config htt p.postBuffer 524288000
Trying to PR a new sample to github.com/pnp/sp-dev-f..., however, I keep getting the following from GitHub when trying to push to my forked version:
cc/ @bernierh.bsky.social
GPT is telling me it could be because the size of the repo is too large for personal accounts; I am skeptical of this.
cc/ @bernierh.bsky.social
GPT is telling me it could be because the size of the repo is too large for personal accounts; I am skeptical of this.
January 24, 2025 at 2:27 AM
Trying to PR a new sample to github.com/pnp/sp-dev-f..., however, I keep getting the following from GitHub when trying to push to my forked version:
cc/ @bernierh.bsky.social
GPT is telling me it could be because the size of the repo is too large for personal accounts; I am skeptical of this.
cc/ @bernierh.bsky.social
GPT is telling me it could be because the size of the repo is too large for personal accounts; I am skeptical of this.
Just want to be sure I am not overlooking something in SPFx extensibility. There is NOT currently a way to extend SPO with SPFx to have a side-by-side panel, like we are seeing with the new Copilot experiences? Only the panel that lays OVERTOP of the page underneath?
January 17, 2025 at 5:34 PM
Just want to be sure I am not overlooking something in SPFx extensibility. There is NOT currently a way to extend SPO with SPFx to have a side-by-side panel, like we are seeing with the new Copilot experiences? Only the panel that lays OVERTOP of the page underneath?