Brian C. Bock
@briancbock.bsky.social
F Elon. Liberal. Progressive. Gay. Married. I really want to give up on politics and news. No more TV news. No more Twitter/X. I tried. Time to get back at it.
Hey! Trump’s balls won’t wash themselves.
November 21, 2025 at 4:49 AM
Hey! Trump’s balls won’t wash themselves.
I’d also be okay with Portland Frog.
November 21, 2025 at 4:19 AM
I’d also be okay with Portland Frog.
Yep. A day later.
November 21, 2025 at 3:47 AM
Yep. A day later.
I don’t know why nobody is talking about this being a criminal conspiracy to defraud the court. That’s a real crime and this fits.
November 21, 2025 at 2:25 AM
I don’t know why nobody is talking about this being a criminal conspiracy to defraud the court. That’s a real crime and this fits.
It makes you wonder if even Pam Bondi, a woman without a moral fiber in her being, wakes up and looks at her phone in the morning and goes: Oh, fuck! What does he want now?
November 21, 2025 at 2:22 AM
It makes you wonder if even Pam Bondi, a woman without a moral fiber in her being, wakes up and looks at her phone in the morning and goes: Oh, fuck! What does he want now?
Bondi and Halligan ought to be impeached.
November 21, 2025 at 2:16 AM
Bondi and Halligan ought to be impeached.
Bad idea. We’ll find out they’re assholes.
November 21, 2025 at 2:11 AM
Bad idea. We’ll find out they’re assholes.
How can TWO jurors find a True Bill in a Grand Jury? If the “government” enumerate? 2<14.
November 21, 2025 at 2:08 AM
How can TWO jurors find a True Bill in a Grand Jury? If the “government” enumerate? 2<14.
Sounds like the judge needs to bring in the rest of the grand jury. “Did you see THIS version of the document? Did you vote on it?” If it’s a “no” there is no indictment.
November 21, 2025 at 2:07 AM
Sounds like the judge needs to bring in the rest of the grand jury. “Did you see THIS version of the document? Did you vote on it?” If it’s a “no” there is no indictment.
It’s more than perjury. It was multiple people, working in concert, taking steps to commit a crime. It’s conspiracy to commit a fraud upon the court.
November 21, 2025 at 1:45 AM
It’s more than perjury. It was multiple people, working in concert, taking steps to commit a crime. It’s conspiracy to commit a fraud upon the court.
They had to patch him back together. Bondo.
November 21, 2025 at 1:39 AM
They had to patch him back together. Bondo.
Why is it a problem. If the franchise wants to imply that all James Bond movies are in the same continuity, he’d be 90 years old. I think people can accept that James Bond reboots.
November 21, 2025 at 1:37 AM
Why is it a problem. If the franchise wants to imply that all James Bond movies are in the same continuity, he’d be 90 years old. I think people can accept that James Bond reboots.
Ew. But at least they didn’t de-queerify Dillon. I was afraid they would.
November 21, 2025 at 1:34 AM
Ew. But at least they didn’t de-queerify Dillon. I was afraid they would.
No. But I have confidence in their ineptitude.
November 20, 2025 at 5:54 PM
No. But I have confidence in their ineptitude.
I wish he’d said what I’ve been saying when people say “What if Democrats are revealed as sexual predators?” My answer: Fuck them. The whole point is to bring predators to justice without fear or favor.
November 20, 2025 at 5:53 PM
I wish he’d said what I’ve been saying when people say “What if Democrats are revealed as sexual predators?” My answer: Fuck them. The whole point is to bring predators to justice without fear or favor.
What is he blathering about. It’d be nice to have context.
November 20, 2025 at 5:49 PM
What is he blathering about. It’d be nice to have context.
I’m shocked the Judge let that roll. Can’t the judge DEMAND an answer under penalty of contempt of court?
November 20, 2025 at 7:53 AM
I’m shocked the Judge let that roll. Can’t the judge DEMAND an answer under penalty of contempt of court?
My favorite bit about this is Jen Psaki’s reaction shot.
November 20, 2025 at 7:50 AM
My favorite bit about this is Jen Psaki’s reaction shot.
Question is, are there enough Republicans to vote it in the Senate, and enough to override a veto.
November 20, 2025 at 7:48 AM
Question is, are there enough Republicans to vote it in the Senate, and enough to override a veto.