Vicarious redemption of humanity via a single human sacrifice is an unethical core principle, so there is a limit to the value of moral condemnation coming from a cleric.
No matter the courageous act, the immorality stands.
Vicarious redemption of humanity via a single human sacrifice is an unethical core principle, so there is a limit to the value of moral condemnation coming from a cleric.
No matter the courageous act, the immorality stands.
If we could challenge (for both the left and the right) the sacred place religion holds in our culture it would go a long way to actual progress.
If we could challenge (for both the left and the right) the sacred place religion holds in our culture it would go a long way to actual progress.
A powerful being could happen upon a universe already existing and claim it as their own
Being a creator does not equal being a god and vice-versa
If you want to define god, you gotta know the rules
A powerful being could happen upon a universe already existing and claim it as their own
Being a creator does not equal being a god and vice-versa
If you want to define god, you gotta know the rules
That is what separates mythological figures like Jesus and Thor from an actual deity
The embrace of reality, not the rejection of it, would be an identifying feature
2/2
That is what separates mythological figures like Jesus and Thor from an actual deity
The embrace of reality, not the rejection of it, would be an identifying feature
2/2
Every example of a god claim that I have encountered has been disproven. I live my life under the 99% certainty that no god exists AKA Russel's Teapot but that is not knowing
1/2
Every example of a god claim that I have encountered has been disproven. I live my life under the 99% certainty that no god exists AKA Russel's Teapot but that is not knowing
1/2
Good luck
Good luck
I know of no god that is based on science or math, only myth and conjecture
Please name this god, and explain how this god is different than nature or the universe
Calling the universe/nature god misrepresents the later and demeans the former
I know of no god that is based on science or math, only myth and conjecture
Please name this god, and explain how this god is different than nature or the universe
Calling the universe/nature god misrepresents the later and demeans the former
So far I hear faith claims and see weak circumstantial claims without a shred of evidence/logic/reason
Once a claim about god is made it is quickly & easily dismissed
The burden is yours to prove there is a god, then I will debunk the claim
Remember, faith lies
So far I hear faith claims and see weak circumstantial claims without a shred of evidence/logic/reason
Once a claim about god is made it is quickly & easily dismissed
The burden is yours to prove there is a god, then I will debunk the claim
Remember, faith lies
Science built buildings and airplanes, faith lead to planes flying into buildings
So far there has not been a scientific answer that was replaced by a religious one, that's not an accident
Ponder this when evaluating your assertion
2/2
Science built buildings and airplanes, faith lead to planes flying into buildings
So far there has not been a scientific answer that was replaced by a religious one, that's not an accident
Ponder this when evaluating your assertion
2/2
I'd rather live in a world of science with no faith, the last time we lived in a faith based world was the dark ages
1/2
I'd rather live in a world of science with no faith, the last time we lived in a faith based world was the dark ages
1/2
Poor epistemology has caused so much harm, so many people have and will be injured/killed by this failure
Better to only accept what can be proven, leave faith for the things that don't matter
2/2
Poor epistemology has caused so much harm, so many people have and will be injured/killed by this failure
Better to only accept what can be proven, leave faith for the things that don't matter
2/2
If you recognize faith can lie, then you must admit your faith could be based on a lie
By what evidence do you make this faith claim, or is it all make believe for you?
1/2
If you recognize faith can lie, then you must admit your faith could be based on a lie
By what evidence do you make this faith claim, or is it all make believe for you?
1/2
Look at what they do to you, these religious hatreds
I offer an honest challenge, taking you up on your request for discourse, and you behave like I am insulting you personally
If you cannot handle a challenge to your beliefs the issue is not with the challenge but the beliefs
4/4
Look at what they do to you, these religious hatreds
I offer an honest challenge, taking you up on your request for discourse, and you behave like I am insulting you personally
If you cannot handle a challenge to your beliefs the issue is not with the challenge but the beliefs
4/4
As CS Lewis stated, you must accept the supernatural or Jesus is a common maniac, Christ hasn't left that option open to you
Either god's all-powerful or not, you don't get to weaken the deity at a whim
3/4
As CS Lewis stated, you must accept the supernatural or Jesus is a common maniac, Christ hasn't left that option open to you
Either god's all-powerful or not, you don't get to weaken the deity at a whim
3/4
What knowledge is given you, that I am not allowed to have? I've read the Bible, several times, and studied its history, yet I was not granted your insights
2/4
What knowledge is given you, that I am not allowed to have? I've read the Bible, several times, and studied its history, yet I was not granted your insights
2/4