In achievement-oriented organizations, failure was more strongly related to risk aversion, whereas in supportive, growth-oriented organizations, success was more strongly tied to proactive improvement. 3/3

Read more here: doi.org/10.1111/apps...

But failures were also linked to cautious, risk-avoidant responses. Only the proactive changes were related to better performance. 2/n

Workplace climate also mattered.

Interested to hear how others are approaching this, especially what’s working in your courses. 4/4

I don’t prohibit AI tools because I think they can be helpful, and I use them myself. But I’m wrestling with how much I can use application activities in the future. I don’t love the idea of relying so heavily on exams, but I don’t know how else to keep things fair for those putting in the work. 3/x

I used best practices for making assignments resistant to outsourcing to AI (and reducing the motivation to do this). Still, its use was pretty frequent and impressive at simulating thoughtful work. I often only caught it when students cited concepts we hadn’t actually covered in the course. 2/x

Congratulations! Excited to see what you do in your new role!

Unfortunately, this doesn’t add to your citation count, but I’ve started referencing this paper in my syllabi when covering the importance of class attendance.

The take-home? Don’t disregard academic performance as not being a predictor of future success, though not all metrics are created equal. And as always, pairing it with other predictors, such as structured interviews, can lead to better hiring decisions. 6/6