Bram Bloemen
@brbloemen.bsky.social
PhD student @ Sciensano, the Belgian National Institute of Health
www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1...
Gotta love this excerpt from @shenwei356.bsky.social and @zaminiqbal.bsky.social’s lexicmap preprint
Gotta love this excerpt from @shenwei356.bsky.social and @zaminiqbal.bsky.social’s lexicmap preprint
June 4, 2025 at 12:08 PM
www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1...
Gotta love this excerpt from @shenwei356.bsky.social and @zaminiqbal.bsky.social’s lexicmap preprint
Gotta love this excerpt from @shenwei356.bsky.social and @zaminiqbal.bsky.social’s lexicmap preprint
They also struggle with plasmid sequences, especially metaMDBG.
We've also seen this, using a spike-in control bacterium with plasmid (6.8kbp). metaFlye is overly careful and gives fragmented assemblies, while metaMDBG is overly eager and generates concatenations
We've also seen this, using a spike-in control bacterium with plasmid (6.8kbp). metaFlye is overly careful and gives fragmented assemblies, while metaMDBG is overly eager and generates concatenations
April 26, 2025 at 12:18 PM
They also struggle with plasmid sequences, especially metaMDBG.
We've also seen this, using a spike-in control bacterium with plasmid (6.8kbp). metaFlye is overly careful and gives fragmented assemblies, while metaMDBG is overly eager and generates concatenations
We've also seen this, using a spike-in control bacterium with plasmid (6.8kbp). metaFlye is overly careful and gives fragmented assemblies, while metaMDBG is overly eager and generates concatenations