Benjamin Lowe
@brainboyben.bsky.social
Cog neuro postdoc at Macquarie Uni, Sydney
Activist for a free Palestine 🇵🇸
AI hater
Activist for a free Palestine 🇵🇸
AI hater
@sulfaro.bsky.social literally what we were just talking about!
October 2, 2025 at 5:15 AM
@sulfaro.bsky.social literally what we were just talking about!
Throw hands and then give hug. Good on ya, Will!
September 30, 2025 at 12:47 AM
Throw hands and then give hug. Good on ya, Will!
Reposted by Benjamin Lowe
5. Today I read a paper by @sabinaleonelli.bsky.social and Alexander Mussgnug that I think illustrates this point perfectly.
philsci-archive.pitt.edu/24891/1/Phil...
philsci-archive.pitt.edu/24891/1/Phil...
August 19, 2025 at 5:11 AM
5. Today I read a paper by @sabinaleonelli.bsky.social and Alexander Mussgnug that I think illustrates this point perfectly.
philsci-archive.pitt.edu/24891/1/Phil...
philsci-archive.pitt.edu/24891/1/Phil...
FYI I've published similar results previously :)
doi.org/10.1016/j.co...
doi.org/10.1016/j.co...
Redirecting
doi.org
August 19, 2025 at 12:36 AM
FYI I've published similar results previously :)
doi.org/10.1016/j.co...
doi.org/10.1016/j.co...
I think a lot of people studying neural expectation have been skeptical of literal interpretations of PC for a while now. Again, this is not same as saying the brain doesn’t integrate prior knowledge with sensory input when resolving precepts.
I’m excited to see where the field goes next :)
I’m excited to see where the field goes next :)
July 15, 2025 at 11:43 AM
I think a lot of people studying neural expectation have been skeptical of literal interpretations of PC for a while now. Again, this is not same as saying the brain doesn’t integrate prior knowledge with sensory input when resolving precepts.
I’m excited to see where the field goes next :)
I’m excited to see where the field goes next :)
IMO (now that this canned of worms has been opened), I think the field would really benefit from moving away from evoked responses and towards pre-stimulus and/or state-based activity characterising how predictions themselves are signalled (rather their errors!)
July 15, 2025 at 11:43 AM
IMO (now that this canned of worms has been opened), I think the field would really benefit from moving away from evoked responses and towards pre-stimulus and/or state-based activity characterising how predictions themselves are signalled (rather their errors!)
The envelope has been pushed forward and now we can think about what these data mean within the broader literature. It’s exciting!
July 15, 2025 at 11:43 AM
The envelope has been pushed forward and now we can think about what these data mean within the broader literature. It’s exciting!