@bradleymck.bsky.social
A person not on Bluesky would be a good start
December 22, 2025 at 7:14 PM
A person not on Bluesky would be a good start
The idea that you posting like this is not its own version of “ego fuel” is funny, but I will say something sincere: log off, step outside, and enjoy your friends and family. You are being driven insane by being online. I wish you the best.
December 22, 2025 at 7:04 PM
The idea that you posting like this is not its own version of “ego fuel” is funny, but I will say something sincere: log off, step outside, and enjoy your friends and family. You are being driven insane by being online. I wish you the best.
You seem like a well-adjusted person.
December 22, 2025 at 6:54 PM
You seem like a well-adjusted person.
Oh shoot is looking bad? I hope things get better
December 22, 2025 at 6:51 PM
Oh shoot is looking bad? I hope things get better
Yes, but your account of the abuse is first hand. Not relayed to you through the prism of Twitter.
December 22, 2025 at 6:50 PM
Yes, but your account of the abuse is first hand. Not relayed to you through the prism of Twitter.
Yes, you and Will Stancil believe everything is caused by “discourse” from “enemies.” And it is hysterical that in this instance Stancil is trying to say something he believes he is experiencing and he is being told (in part) that it is caused by “discourse” from “enemies.”
December 22, 2025 at 6:31 PM
Yes, you and Will Stancil believe everything is caused by “discourse” from “enemies.” And it is hysterical that in this instance Stancil is trying to say something he believes he is experiencing and he is being told (in part) that it is caused by “discourse” from “enemies.”
Ok so what is your answer here? Assume everything you say is true, what should the Democrats do to win elections?
December 22, 2025 at 6:28 PM
Ok so what is your answer here? Assume everything you say is true, what should the Democrats do to win elections?
“Considering your follower count” you guys aren’t real, man lol.
December 22, 2025 at 6:24 PM
“Considering your follower count” you guys aren’t real, man lol.
White people voting for one party over the other one, is not evidence that the party is run on “white identity.” You just actually can’t be this stupid. I refuse to believe it.
December 22, 2025 at 6:04 PM
White people voting for one party over the other one, is not evidence that the party is run on “white identity.” You just actually can’t be this stupid. I refuse to believe it.
Lmao so white people can only vote on “white identity.” So literally by this logic Democrats will either need to become the “white identity” party or never win white people’s votes again? That’s your argument?
December 22, 2025 at 6:02 PM
Lmao so white people can only vote on “white identity.” So literally by this logic Democrats will either need to become the “white identity” party or never win white people’s votes again? That’s your argument?
I am smart, that’s unfortunately the issue.
December 22, 2025 at 6:01 PM
I am smart, that’s unfortunately the issue.
“Interrupt her” in a reply 20 minutes later on a social media site. Lmfao. Do you people hear yourselves or only the echos within your own asshole? Genuine question.
December 22, 2025 at 5:54 PM
“Interrupt her” in a reply 20 minutes later on a social media site. Lmfao. Do you people hear yourselves or only the echos within your own asshole? Genuine question.
Yes, nobody should have to prove their claims and asking them to do so is only further proof of their claims. This is good logic I am sure it will take you a long way.
December 22, 2025 at 5:33 PM
Yes, nobody should have to prove their claims and asking them to do so is only further proof of their claims. This is good logic I am sure it will take you a long way.
I love this, because Will Stancil is complaining in the first order about the terribleness of this website’s discourse. And then in a hilarious stroke of irony he is told by one of his disciples “no, no, this is not happening you have just been made to believe that by other social medias”
December 22, 2025 at 5:32 PM
I love this, because Will Stancil is complaining in the first order about the terribleness of this website’s discourse. And then in a hilarious stroke of irony he is told by one of his disciples “no, no, this is not happening you have just been made to believe that by other social medias”
The Republican Party is not defined by “the identity of whiteness” to any normal voter. If you really believe that, please cite evidence for that claim.
December 22, 2025 at 5:28 PM
The Republican Party is not defined by “the identity of whiteness” to any normal voter. If you really believe that, please cite evidence for that claim.
The original tweet here is asking why we care about the context of electoral performance and not just the “did you win your race” part and if you can’t understand why that is a truly idiotic way to evaluate who the good candidates are…you probably should just do something else with your life
December 21, 2025 at 5:25 PM
The original tweet here is asking why we care about the context of electoral performance and not just the “did you win your race” part and if you can’t understand why that is a truly idiotic way to evaluate who the good candidates are…you probably should just do something else with your life
It’s hilarious that you people willingly just out yourselves as idiots like this lmao.
December 21, 2025 at 12:19 AM
It’s hilarious that you people willingly just out yourselves as idiots like this lmao.
You just really can’t grasp the concept of confounding variables can you?
December 17, 2025 at 5:04 PM
You just really can’t grasp the concept of confounding variables can you?
Just an out-and-out conspiracy theorist. Cool.
December 10, 2025 at 6:47 PM
Just an out-and-out conspiracy theorist. Cool.
I like these three. He’s also done a bunch of pro-vaccine stuff that I like to recommend to conservatives because but that wouldn’t be informative to the BlueSky audience.
December 8, 2025 at 11:25 PM
You can intuit who they are more likely to support in a variety of ways — including polls, which generally show the results I just stated.
December 5, 2025 at 8:35 PM
You can intuit who they are more likely to support in a variety of ways — including polls, which generally show the results I just stated.
The people who don’t vote….are more likely to support Trump than the current electorate. You have everything backwards and yet you speak with such confidence, it’s amazing.
December 5, 2025 at 8:18 PM
The people who don’t vote….are more likely to support Trump than the current electorate. You have everything backwards and yet you speak with such confidence, it’s amazing.
Just an incredible strawman here and you know it.
December 5, 2025 at 8:14 PM
Just an incredible strawman here and you know it.
What is your evidence for the assertion that people rely on “outside sources of info” for their sense of the economy?
December 4, 2025 at 3:38 PM
What is your evidence for the assertion that people rely on “outside sources of info” for their sense of the economy?
It is absolutely hilarious for people who constantly moralize on Bluesky to be making this argument about “the thrill of smug satisfaction” as a pseudo-intellectual grift.
Look inward my brothers!
Look inward my brothers!
November 17, 2025 at 2:00 AM
It is absolutely hilarious for people who constantly moralize on Bluesky to be making this argument about “the thrill of smug satisfaction” as a pseudo-intellectual grift.
Look inward my brothers!
Look inward my brothers!