Craig Lastname
@bpsw.bsky.social
Content creator verging on complacent. Writer, ex-screen
Excellent show. Best yet on post-Katrina NOLA. Thanks!
September 14, 2025 at 11:00 PM
Excellent show. Best yet on post-Katrina NOLA. Thanks!
Walz was totally cringe. He was given reign a few times and social media was overwhelmingly negative.
May 9, 2025 at 3:56 PM
Walz was totally cringe. He was given reign a few times and social media was overwhelmingly negative.
Walz hand-clasping prayer and bow to the crowd before every appearance was a prelude to an unfocused, uninspiring, rally cry. He got nominated for one viral tweet and his ability to handle a friendly TV news interview. Won’t get fooled again.
May 9, 2025 at 3:53 PM
Walz hand-clasping prayer and bow to the crowd before every appearance was a prelude to an unfocused, uninspiring, rally cry. He got nominated for one viral tweet and his ability to handle a friendly TV news interview. Won’t get fooled again.
Wow, a great wit with a sour disposition — how unusual!
May 9, 2025 at 3:50 PM
Wow, a great wit with a sour disposition — how unusual!
Trump won’t leave peacefully. Next time will be like last only worse. If you think the constitution’s limiting presidents to two terms is going to stop him you’re pissing into the wind
April 18, 2025 at 10:31 PM
Trump won’t leave peacefully. Next time will be like last only worse. If you think the constitution’s limiting presidents to two terms is going to stop him you’re pissing into the wind
Hey, read Richard V. Reeves. The evidence is the young, white males you’re slamming are taking a systematic educational beating that greatly disadvantages them. Left unaware, Right ignorant
April 4, 2025 at 3:52 PM
Hey, read Richard V. Reeves. The evidence is the young, white males you’re slamming are taking a systematic educational beating that greatly disadvantages them. Left unaware, Right ignorant
Revolutions are won by those who sees the chance and fight for what they believe at the right moment.
March 21, 2025 at 10:29 PM
Revolutions are won by those who sees the chance and fight for what they believe at the right moment.
“I’m not willing to throw the judiciary under the bus to immediately deport a couple hundred imprisoned bad guys. They’re not worth destroying our Justice system. And they’ll be back. You only do this if you want totalitarianism” Why can’t Democrats say something simple and clear like this?
March 19, 2025 at 3:57 PM
“I’m not willing to throw the judiciary under the bus to immediately deport a couple hundred imprisoned bad guys. They’re not worth destroying our Justice system. And they’ll be back. You only do this if you want totalitarianism” Why can’t Democrats say something simple and clear like this?
“I’m not willing to throw the judiciary under the bus to immediately deport a couple hundred imprisoned bad guys. They’re not worth destroying our Justice system. And they’ll be back. You only do this if you want totalitarianism” Why can’t Democrats message clearly?
March 19, 2025 at 3:55 PM
“I’m not willing to throw the judiciary under the bus to immediately deport a couple hundred imprisoned bad guys. They’re not worth destroying our Justice system. And they’ll be back. You only do this if you want totalitarianism” Why can’t Democrats message clearly?
“I’m not willing to throw the judiciary under the bus to immediately deport a couple hundred imprisoned bad guys. They’re not worth destroying our Justice system. And they’ll be back. You only do this if you want totalitarianism.” Why can’t Democrats message clearly like this? Messenger Wanted
March 19, 2025 at 3:53 PM
“I’m not willing to throw the judiciary under the bus to immediately deport a couple hundred imprisoned bad guys. They’re not worth destroying our Justice system. And they’ll be back. You only do this if you want totalitarianism.” Why can’t Democrats message clearly like this? Messenger Wanted
Schumer is not the problem in fighting is the problem. And inane messaging. “You don’t throw the judiciary under the bus to immediately deport a couple hundred imprisoned bad guys. They’re not worth destroying our Justice system. And they’ll be back. You only do this if you want to totalitarianism”
March 19, 2025 at 3:50 PM
Schumer is not the problem in fighting is the problem. And inane messaging. “You don’t throw the judiciary under the bus to immediately deport a couple hundred imprisoned bad guys. They’re not worth destroying our Justice system. And they’ll be back. You only do this if you want to totalitarianism”
“I’m not willing to throw the judiciary under the bus to immediately deport a couple hundred imprisoned bad guys. They’re not worth destroying our Justice system. And they’ll be back. You only do this if you want to totalitarianism” message clearly and keep it on the enemy
March 19, 2025 at 3:48 PM
“I’m not willing to throw the judiciary under the bus to immediately deport a couple hundred imprisoned bad guys. They’re not worth destroying our Justice system. And they’ll be back. You only do this if you want to totalitarianism” message clearly and keep it on the enemy
“I’m not willing to throw the judiciary under the bus to immediately deport a couple hundred imprisoned bad guys. They’re not worth destroying our Justice system. And they’ll be back. You only do this if you want totalitarianism” Why aren’t Democrats saying this? In fighting and bad messaging.
March 19, 2025 at 3:46 PM
“I’m not willing to throw the judiciary under the bus to immediately deport a couple hundred imprisoned bad guys. They’re not worth destroying our Justice system. And they’ll be back. You only do this if you want totalitarianism” Why aren’t Democrats saying this? In fighting and bad messaging.
“I’m not willing to throw the judiciary under the bus to immediately deport a couple hundred imprisoned bad guys. They’re not worth destroying our Justice system. And they’ll be back. You only do this if you want totalitarianism” Why can’t Democrats say something simple and clear like this?
March 19, 2025 at 3:44 PM
“I’m not willing to throw the judiciary under the bus to immediately deport a couple hundred imprisoned bad guys. They’re not worth destroying our Justice system. And they’ll be back. You only do this if you want totalitarianism” Why can’t Democrats say something simple and clear like this?
“I’m not willing to throw the judiciary under the bus to immediately deport a couple hundred imprisoned bad guys. They’re not worth destroying our Justice system. And they’ll be back. You only do this if you want to totalitarianism” Why can’t Democrats say something simple and clear like this?
March 19, 2025 at 3:42 PM
“I’m not willing to throw the judiciary under the bus to immediately deport a couple hundred imprisoned bad guys. They’re not worth destroying our Justice system. And they’ll be back. You only do this if you want to totalitarianism” Why can’t Democrats say something simple and clear like this?
This is a waste of pixels. Try and imagine if you have anything left in that head of yours what things would look like if we had shut down the government, we would be attacking Schumer with pitchforks! Wake up, say something helpful or shut up
March 19, 2025 at 3:31 PM
This is a waste of pixels. Try and imagine if you have anything left in that head of yours what things would look like if we had shut down the government, we would be attacking Schumer with pitchforks! Wake up, say something helpful or shut up
It sounds very progressive and humane and in a rich, enlightened world it wouldn’t even be controversial. But if you’re gonna say shit like that on camera in California don’t ever run for president cause you’re not a smart enough politician. You pulled out all the stops to get elected in California.
March 19, 2025 at 7:03 AM
It sounds very progressive and humane and in a rich, enlightened world it wouldn’t even be controversial. But if you’re gonna say shit like that on camera in California don’t ever run for president cause you’re not a smart enough politician. You pulled out all the stops to get elected in California.
And next time let’s not nominate somebody who has footage of themselves advocating for the government funded payment of gender transition surgery for prisoners. I don’t mind someone being for that. I just don’t want them to say it! OK! Can you live with that?
March 19, 2025 at 6:53 AM
And next time let’s not nominate somebody who has footage of themselves advocating for the government funded payment of gender transition surgery for prisoners. I don’t mind someone being for that. I just don’t want them to say it! OK! Can you live with that?
We just have to get out of our own way. Schumer said the quiet part out loud. He’s a terrible spokesman, but stop wasting your time attacking your friends. Be thankful we are not talking about the Democrat caused shut down and how we have put the entire government in Trump’s hands.
March 19, 2025 at 6:51 AM
We just have to get out of our own way. Schumer said the quiet part out loud. He’s a terrible spokesman, but stop wasting your time attacking your friends. Be thankful we are not talking about the Democrat caused shut down and how we have put the entire government in Trump’s hands.
Your numbers are probably right. We are forgetting what we know. Trump always always always crashes and burns. The casinos, the bankruptcies, the flagrant overt overtures to Russia that created Russiagate and paralyzed his presidency, his perfect phone call with Zelenskyy. He’s doing it again…
March 19, 2025 at 6:50 AM
Your numbers are probably right. We are forgetting what we know. Trump always always always crashes and burns. The casinos, the bankruptcies, the flagrant overt overtures to Russia that created Russiagate and paralyzed his presidency, his perfect phone call with Zelenskyy. He’s doing it again…
It’s so hard to get a headline by simply breaking the law if you’re not Donald Trump. We democrats need to do more to help these poor underserved public servants get the attention for their felonies that they so richly deserve.
March 19, 2025 at 6:43 AM
It’s so hard to get a headline by simply breaking the law if you’re not Donald Trump. We democrats need to do more to help these poor underserved public servants get the attention for their felonies that they so richly deserve.
Well, at least you and I agree on one thing — the goal is a winning strategy. I’m a little more skeptical than you that that the most humane appeal the winning strategy
March 19, 2025 at 6:36 AM
Well, at least you and I agree on one thing — the goal is a winning strategy. I’m a little more skeptical than you that that the most humane appeal the winning strategy