@bpa12.bsky.social
Yeah.
But i think she may have been the very best at needling trump. If she was going to be better, she could have kept it up for another year or 2. I won't pretend to know her district well but I can't imagine a district that voted her in is about to vote an upstanding citizen to replace her.
But i think she may have been the very best at needling trump. If she was going to be better, she could have kept it up for another year or 2. I won't pretend to know her district well but I can't imagine a district that voted her in is about to vote an upstanding citizen to replace her.
November 22, 2025 at 2:12 AM
Yeah.
But i think she may have been the very best at needling trump. If she was going to be better, she could have kept it up for another year or 2. I won't pretend to know her district well but I can't imagine a district that voted her in is about to vote an upstanding citizen to replace her.
But i think she may have been the very best at needling trump. If she was going to be better, she could have kept it up for another year or 2. I won't pretend to know her district well but I can't imagine a district that voted her in is about to vote an upstanding citizen to replace her.
If you look at everyone after the first two guys, the vibes say " I really don't want to do this for their Instagram."
November 22, 2025 at 12:51 AM
If you look at everyone after the first two guys, the vibes say " I really don't want to do this for their Instagram."
I like this way, way, way more than inane posts about fashion.
November 22, 2025 at 12:49 AM
I like this way, way, way more than inane posts about fashion.
Some of these guys are early in their career, but I would certainly look to Murray and Young.
Also, how do you handle someone like Winston? He was the top pick that year in a weak class. A lot of his draft profiles included the potential for exactly this career. Lawrence surely more disappointing.
Also, how do you handle someone like Winston? He was the top pick that year in a weak class. A lot of his draft profiles included the potential for exactly this career. Lawrence surely more disappointing.
November 22, 2025 at 12:02 AM
Some of these guys are early in their career, but I would certainly look to Murray and Young.
Also, how do you handle someone like Winston? He was the top pick that year in a weak class. A lot of his draft profiles included the potential for exactly this career. Lawrence surely more disappointing.
Also, how do you handle someone like Winston? He was the top pick that year in a weak class. A lot of his draft profiles included the potential for exactly this career. Lawrence surely more disappointing.
Institutions caving immediately under pressure should never be forgotten.
November 21, 2025 at 10:22 PM
Institutions caving immediately under pressure should never be forgotten.
European leaders have failed to take up the charge for 3 years now, despite it being obvious that the United States was only half in under Biden, and completely unreliable under Trump. If they want to do more for Ukraine, it's passed time to take the reigns.
November 21, 2025 at 1:38 PM
European leaders have failed to take up the charge for 3 years now, despite it being obvious that the United States was only half in under Biden, and completely unreliable under Trump. If they want to do more for Ukraine, it's passed time to take the reigns.
He's like 23 so i certainly could end up with the proverbial egg on my face. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
For now, i don't really like any of these three, but would go heavily in Ja's direction except, uh, maturity.
For now, i don't really like any of these three, but would go heavily in Ja's direction except, uh, maturity.
November 21, 2025 at 12:40 AM
He's like 23 so i certainly could end up with the proverbial egg on my face. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
For now, i don't really like any of these three, but would go heavily in Ja's direction except, uh, maturity.
For now, i don't really like any of these three, but would go heavily in Ja's direction except, uh, maturity.
People smarter than me rate him pretty low. Ben Golliver of the Washington Post just rated him 0/10 for trade interest. I just see it the way he does. I'll be shocked if that dude is ever a winner and would prefer someone with less numbers and more team orientation.
November 21, 2025 at 12:20 AM
People smarter than me rate him pretty low. Ben Golliver of the Washington Post just rated him 0/10 for trade interest. I just see it the way he does. I'll be shocked if that dude is ever a winner and would prefer someone with less numbers and more team orientation.
Assist numbers are fine. But he's not the first to have a bunch and run a meh offense. Fair re: team though. Not well run.
There's 32 teams and only one wins every year. So someone will max him (contract might be ok today but not forever) in order to entertain. They're welcome to him.
There's 32 teams and only one wins every year. So someone will max him (contract might be ok today but not forever) in order to entertain. They're welcome to him.
November 21, 2025 at 12:19 AM
Assist numbers are fine. But he's not the first to have a bunch and run a meh offense. Fair re: team though. Not well run.
There's 32 teams and only one wins every year. So someone will max him (contract might be ok today but not forever) in order to entertain. They're welcome to him.
There's 32 teams and only one wins every year. So someone will max him (contract might be ok today but not forever) in order to entertain. They're welcome to him.
Me, waving goodbye to all three.
Nothing is more crippling in the NBA than having to pay a max contract to someone we dominates the ball and scores as their best skill, but doesn't do it good enough to go anywhere.
Nothing is more crippling in the NBA than having to pay a max contract to someone we dominates the ball and scores as their best skill, but doesn't do it good enough to go anywhere.
November 21, 2025 at 12:05 AM
Me, waving goodbye to all three.
Nothing is more crippling in the NBA than having to pay a max contract to someone we dominates the ball and scores as their best skill, but doesn't do it good enough to go anywhere.
Nothing is more crippling in the NBA than having to pay a max contract to someone we dominates the ball and scores as their best skill, but doesn't do it good enough to go anywhere.
Sports illustrated as well
November 19, 2025 at 11:47 PM
Sports illustrated as well
1. Correct
2. From what I have seen, Epstein really was very good at saying almost nothing in return, but making these idiots feel like they had a buddy. Maybe they just needed an AI chatbot all along.
2. From what I have seen, Epstein really was very good at saying almost nothing in return, but making these idiots feel like they had a buddy. Maybe they just needed an AI chatbot all along.
November 19, 2025 at 11:29 PM
1. Correct
2. From what I have seen, Epstein really was very good at saying almost nothing in return, but making these idiots feel like they had a buddy. Maybe they just needed an AI chatbot all along.
2. From what I have seen, Epstein really was very good at saying almost nothing in return, but making these idiots feel like they had a buddy. Maybe they just needed an AI chatbot all along.
The most fun I have had watching him in recent years is the Paris Olympics, where he was essentially Magic Johnson with less flair and more precision. He can play another 3-4 years, insanely enough, just accepting that he is a 90's style PG who should be third on the team in scoring.
November 19, 2025 at 4:18 PM
The most fun I have had watching him in recent years is the Paris Olympics, where he was essentially Magic Johnson with less flair and more precision. He can play another 3-4 years, insanely enough, just accepting that he is a 90's style PG who should be third on the team in scoring.
Experts???
Inane and insane. Go have a party. You won't die if you haven't read "expert" advice first.
Inane and insane. Go have a party. You won't die if you haven't read "expert" advice first.
November 19, 2025 at 1:06 PM
Experts???
Inane and insane. Go have a party. You won't die if you haven't read "expert" advice first.
Inane and insane. Go have a party. You won't die if you haven't read "expert" advice first.
This has always seemed true to me. No politician can waive a magic wand and make everything all better. That goes for the economy and pretty much anything else.
But you sure can screw things up if you're in the top job.
But you sure can screw things up if you're in the top job.
November 19, 2025 at 12:11 AM
This has always seemed true to me. No politician can waive a magic wand and make everything all better. That goes for the economy and pretty much anything else.
But you sure can screw things up if you're in the top job.
But you sure can screw things up if you're in the top job.
I's not a criticism of your post, to be clear. I just find it suspicious that no defenses were really good for the first 15 or so years after the merger, and then just a few in the 90s. It makes me think some rule change led to some defenses standing out more compared to the crowd than before.
November 18, 2025 at 5:31 PM
I's not a criticism of your post, to be clear. I just find it suspicious that no defenses were really good for the first 15 or so years after the merger, and then just a few in the 90s. It makes me think some rule change led to some defenses standing out more compared to the crowd than before.
Does it raise any eyebrows that 17 of the top 20 are from this century? Seems like a statistic that could use some tweaking.
November 18, 2025 at 5:16 PM
Does it raise any eyebrows that 17 of the top 20 are from this century? Seems like a statistic that could use some tweaking.
Perhaps this is a good time for everyone to notice that the NYT has been putting out a lot of commercials for famous people lately. Articles will have a headline like "So-and-so is done with excuses" and then a glamour shot. It's really a very gossip-magazine presentation. And kind of gross.
November 18, 2025 at 4:48 PM
Perhaps this is a good time for everyone to notice that the NYT has been putting out a lot of commercials for famous people lately. Articles will have a headline like "So-and-so is done with excuses" and then a glamour shot. It's really a very gossip-magazine presentation. And kind of gross.
Yes.
This place can fall as much into frantic group think as any other online ecosystem. It can be exhausting.
This place can fall as much into frantic group think as any other online ecosystem. It can be exhausting.
November 14, 2025 at 8:59 PM
Yes.
This place can fall as much into frantic group think as any other online ecosystem. It can be exhausting.
This place can fall as much into frantic group think as any other online ecosystem. It can be exhausting.
They operate under the belief that Dems are like MAGA. Dems must see Clinton as a god deserving of adulation and protection and be fearful of anything that taints his image.
Except, you know, dem voters don't act like that. If Clinton's name is throughout, disown the man. They can't fathom it.
Except, you know, dem voters don't act like that. If Clinton's name is throughout, disown the man. They can't fathom it.
November 14, 2025 at 4:24 PM
They operate under the belief that Dems are like MAGA. Dems must see Clinton as a god deserving of adulation and protection and be fearful of anything that taints his image.
Except, you know, dem voters don't act like that. If Clinton's name is throughout, disown the man. They can't fathom it.
Except, you know, dem voters don't act like that. If Clinton's name is throughout, disown the man. They can't fathom it.
As a grown woman, she certainly would have never complained about unwanted sexual advances from a powerful man that she felt difficult to turn down.
November 14, 2025 at 12:49 AM
As a grown woman, she certainly would have never complained about unwanted sexual advances from a powerful man that she felt difficult to turn down.
This is a Minnesota team, it's sitting right there for you! Passive aggressive!
November 11, 2025 at 2:20 PM
This is a Minnesota team, it's sitting right there for you! Passive aggressive!
Huh. I'm not a big Bond guy, so it's not like I'm familiar with the "lore." But I would have assumed that the whole deal is, when a double 007 goes down a different 007 takes place their place
November 11, 2025 at 2:13 PM
Huh. I'm not a big Bond guy, so it's not like I'm familiar with the "lore." But I would have assumed that the whole deal is, when a double 007 goes down a different 007 takes place their place