bowtie.bsky.social
@bowtie.bsky.social
In line with their environmental policies.
December 20, 2025 at 1:52 PM
In line with their environmental policies.
Like the loss of Erasmus had a deleterious effect upon the Upper Classes. To coin Jilly Cooper’s categorisation it was the Lower Middles and Working Class kids who suffered. <ducks>
December 18, 2025 at 7:09 PM
Like the loss of Erasmus had a deleterious effect upon the Upper Classes. To coin Jilly Cooper’s categorisation it was the Lower Middles and Working Class kids who suffered. <ducks>
I don’t get this. I’m working/middle class and am hugely happy to think that young working class men won’t be used yet again as cannon fodder in rich mens’ wars.
What does she mean? She’s addled.
What does she mean? She’s addled.
December 17, 2025 at 8:45 PM
I don’t get this. I’m working/middle class and am hugely happy to think that young working class men won’t be used yet again as cannon fodder in rich mens’ wars.
What does she mean? She’s addled.
What does she mean? She’s addled.
Pretty sure his legal team might have considered that as well 🙄
December 16, 2025 at 2:59 PM
Pretty sure his legal team might have considered that as well 🙄
In the future, I hope we remember the companies which did this.
December 10, 2025 at 9:00 PM
In the future, I hope we remember the companies which did this.
It’s happened before in history and we casually laughed, wondering how people could have allowed it. Now we know.
December 10, 2025 at 8:58 PM
It’s happened before in history and we casually laughed, wondering how people could have allowed it. Now we know.
Same with yesterday’s evil freak who was convicted yesterday in Wales.
December 10, 2025 at 8:51 PM
Same with yesterday’s evil freak who was convicted yesterday in Wales.
When cringe and corruption find love.
December 10, 2025 at 8:46 PM
When cringe and corruption find love.
Yup, the love of money is the root of all evil. Chaucer nailed it.
December 10, 2025 at 8:43 PM
Yup, the love of money is the root of all evil. Chaucer nailed it.
So, tell me about this “legacy of excellence”?
December 8, 2025 at 4:17 PM
So, tell me about this “legacy of excellence”?
Yes you’re right.
December 6, 2025 at 8:33 PM
Yes you’re right.
I’m so suspicious of everything now that I wonder why this is coming out when it should have come out ages ago? I hate that I’m even thinking that.
December 6, 2025 at 8:22 PM
I’m so suspicious of everything now that I wonder why this is coming out when it should have come out ages ago? I hate that I’m even thinking that.
I guess the human centipede did for a bit in that horror movie. That one admittedly didn’t have the tech bros and millionaires touching themselves vigorously as they surveyed what they created.
December 2, 2025 at 9:39 PM
I guess the human centipede did for a bit in that horror movie. That one admittedly didn’t have the tech bros and millionaires touching themselves vigorously as they surveyed what they created.
He’s keeping the racists on side by not apologising and the Torygraph on side by aligning with the Tories. I’m just so tired.
December 2, 2025 at 9:36 PM
He’s keeping the racists on side by not apologising and the Torygraph on side by aligning with the Tories. I’m just so tired.
I follow these people but also follow people like Dan Neidle too. Is there any hope left for us all? The whole political landscape feels so depressing and overwhelming.
December 2, 2025 at 9:30 PM
I follow these people but also follow people like Dan Neidle too. Is there any hope left for us all? The whole political landscape feels so depressing and overwhelming.
Jurors do get multiple warnings. The temptation to discuss a case with a fellow juror outside the room is also intense. Especially in a very emotive trial. I get it but jurors shouldn’t do it.
December 2, 2025 at 9:11 PM
Jurors do get multiple warnings. The temptation to discuss a case with a fellow juror outside the room is also intense. Especially in a very emotive trial. I get it but jurors shouldn’t do it.
The presumption is that the case should only be prosecuted in court. What about the risk of bad actors doing “their own research”?
December 2, 2025 at 9:10 PM
The presumption is that the case should only be prosecuted in court. What about the risk of bad actors doing “their own research”?
Yes you can disagree with your fellow jurors and there’s no appeal. If that’s what you mean. I understand that it’s tough if that happens. Would it be any fairer if there was no jury system? I really don’t know.
December 2, 2025 at 9:08 PM
Yes you can disagree with your fellow jurors and there’s no appeal. If that’s what you mean. I understand that it’s tough if that happens. Would it be any fairer if there was no jury system? I really don’t know.
Sorry? What do you mean? Are you some kind of McKenzie Friend?
December 2, 2025 at 8:39 PM
Sorry? What do you mean? Are you some kind of McKenzie Friend?