For some reason, I’m locked by Captain Mark Kelly. I’m certain I’ve never said anything to offend him. I’m as anti maga as they come. I don’t even post much.
For some reason, I’m locked by Captain Mark Kelly. I’m certain I’ve never said anything to offend him. I’m as anti maga as they come. I don’t even post much.
Doesn’t seem very LGBT friendly
Doesn’t seem very LGBT friendly
I admire that in a person. Lol.
I admire that in a person. Lol.
In other words, the pilots fought all the way to the ground and kept it somewhat survivable.
The cockpit audio, if we ever hear it, will tell a sad and heroic story.
In other words, the pilots fought all the way to the ground and kept it somewhat survivable.
The cockpit audio, if we ever hear it, will tell a sad and heroic story.
She could very well have been an errant food delivery or wrong house
Hopefully you don’t own any guns
2
She could very well have been an errant food delivery or wrong house
Hopefully you don’t own any guns
2
He hasn’t any “no trespass” signs or even a locked gate.
He has a sidewalk and a doorbell. Anyone can ring his doorbell unless told otherwise
1
He hasn’t any “no trespass” signs or even a locked gate.
He has a sidewalk and a doorbell. Anyone can ring his doorbell unless told otherwise
1
A bullet? Oooh a tough guy… You shoot people for knocking on your door? 🤡
A bullet? Oooh a tough guy… You shoot people for knocking on your door? 🤡
Friends of mine taught him at Lyons Township. He was apparently a little jagoff back then too.
youtu.be/axPtgcU7GYc?...
Friends of mine taught him at Lyons Township. He was apparently a little jagoff back then too.
youtu.be/axPtgcU7GYc?...
The only way this could be better is if @johncleese.bsky.social files a friend of the court response as well.
The only way this could be better is if @johncleese.bsky.social files a friend of the court response as well.
The 10th Circuit Court of Appeals recently ruled the opposite. Lorance is more applicable because it addressed the matter head on. In Burdick “imputation” was merely listed as a reason one “may” reject pardon.
The 10th Circuit Court of Appeals recently ruled the opposite. Lorance is more applicable because it addressed the matter head on. In Burdick “imputation” was merely listed as a reason one “may” reject pardon.
That’s based on an off the cuff statement (otherwise known as dictum in legal circles) in a 100 year old case.
One of the tenets of the pardon power has been to stop unjust prosecution
That’s based on an off the cuff statement (otherwise known as dictum in legal circles) in a 100 year old case.
One of the tenets of the pardon power has been to stop unjust prosecution
Accepting a pardon is not an admission of guilt. 1/2
Accepting a pardon is not an admission of guilt. 1/2
The DOJ has a policy regarding pardons. But that is not law nor does it have anything to do with The Constitutional power to pardon.
An appeals court recently affirmed this position, btw.
The DOJ has a policy regarding pardons. But that is not law nor does it have anything to do with The Constitutional power to pardon.
An appeals court recently affirmed this position, btw.