Uniforms have absolutely nothing to do with performance on the field. Uniforms either look good or they don't. Every team should wear their best ones regardless of what the era is "associated with".

Hey man, any fan can care about any thing. I'm only giving you the opinion of this fan.

I beleive in level playing fields. If someone else doesn't, they may be against a salary cap. People can be for or against whatever they want.

But it's complete rubbish that it hurts players and helps owners.

I never said anything about "parity". If everyone operates under the same framework and one or a few teams are able to achieve sustained success because they assembled a better roster/coaching staff/front office, then that's wonderful. I have no issue with dynasties. I only have issue with imbalance

The NFL and the NHL got it figured out long ago.

Lol that's like saying two sprinters are racing under the same set of rules, one just starts the race five yards further up the track than the other. You're unserious.

It doesn't depress players' pay. Players get a percentage of overall revenue. That percentage can be negotiated.

Yes, a salary floor, which should/would absolutely be a part of any salary cap just as it is in the NFL and NHL.

It distrubutes a percentage of overall revenue to players. What percentage that would be is a matter of negotiation. It also puts every team under the same set of rules, which is an even more very important distinction.

Nobody "feels sorry" for owners, and no one wants a salary cap to keep salaries down and save money for owners. A cap just distributes the same money to the same players, only more evenly. It's the best system by far, taking how rich each owner is (or how rich they wish to be) out of the equation.