From the article:
Can you have positive cases if you don't test?
Can you have positive cases if you don't test?
May 19, 2025 at 8:56 PM
From the article:
Can you have positive cases if you don't test?
Can you have positive cases if you don't test?
That's not belittling voters?
Like... this is shit analysis, first.
1. That's true of every state in history...a multi racial democracy hasn't really been tried before... we're kinda the first and we're barely 100 years old with that aspect.
2. I don't even know what this means.... media bad.
Like... this is shit analysis, first.
1. That's true of every state in history...a multi racial democracy hasn't really been tried before... we're kinda the first and we're barely 100 years old with that aspect.
2. I don't even know what this means.... media bad.
May 18, 2025 at 10:19 PM
That's not belittling voters?
Like... this is shit analysis, first.
1. That's true of every state in history...a multi racial democracy hasn't really been tried before... we're kinda the first and we're barely 100 years old with that aspect.
2. I don't even know what this means.... media bad.
Like... this is shit analysis, first.
1. That's true of every state in history...a multi racial democracy hasn't really been tried before... we're kinda the first and we're barely 100 years old with that aspect.
2. I don't even know what this means.... media bad.
Is this like a daily vibes account?
May 17, 2025 at 3:46 PM
Is this like a daily vibes account?
Both parties.
Not equal gender disparity.
Not equal gender disparity.
October 30, 2024 at 3:17 AM
Both parties.
Not equal gender disparity.
Not equal gender disparity.
Ever see one of those pictures and think... "Man... this picture is like 3 years before its time."
September 30, 2024 at 11:05 PM
Ever see one of those pictures and think... "Man... this picture is like 3 years before its time."
At least the supply gets mentioned in an aside, 10 paragraphs down with few details.
August 18, 2024 at 5:52 AM
At least the supply gets mentioned in an aside, 10 paragraphs down with few details.
This stupid idjit had his acl reattached
July 30, 2024 at 9:02 AM
This stupid idjit had his acl reattached
Lol... you can't even stick to a critique. You're just shooting everything against the wall to see what sticks. These two statements are diametrically opposed to each other.
July 13, 2024 at 8:38 PM
Lol... you can't even stick to a critique. You're just shooting everything against the wall to see what sticks. These two statements are diametrically opposed to each other.
Yeah... it's not like it's exactly like I said. They're the same response. One is just polite.
July 12, 2024 at 3:59 PM
Yeah... it's not like it's exactly like I said. They're the same response. One is just polite.
Not working currently, tho
July 9, 2024 at 4:55 PM
Not working currently, tho
They're rubbing our noses in it, too.
July 1, 2024 at 11:35 PM
They're rubbing our noses in it, too.
Brett Kavanaugh's "rule for the ages" with regards to presidential immunity is about to find out that the ages are about 20 years long.
July 1, 2024 at 9:04 PM
Brett Kavanaugh's "rule for the ages" with regards to presidential immunity is about to find out that the ages are about 20 years long.
There were not, however, in Hawaii in 1864.
June 25, 2024 at 3:46 PM
There were not, however, in Hawaii in 1864.
What's crazy to me... is that I did a google search for her AFTER coming up with a mental image. And somehow.... my brain didn't go hard enough.
June 24, 2024 at 3:14 PM
What's crazy to me... is that I did a google search for her AFTER coming up with a mental image. And somehow.... my brain didn't go hard enough.
But to me... this runs afoul of originalism (ha ha)
The statute clearly is trying to avoid mechanisms to gain fully-automatic firing.
The bump stock was designed to very cleverly get around the intent of the law by being too-cute-by-half.
Judges don't have to throw their arms up and say Oh well!
The statute clearly is trying to avoid mechanisms to gain fully-automatic firing.
The bump stock was designed to very cleverly get around the intent of the law by being too-cute-by-half.
Judges don't have to throw their arms up and say Oh well!
June 15, 2024 at 8:50 PM
But to me... this runs afoul of originalism (ha ha)
The statute clearly is trying to avoid mechanisms to gain fully-automatic firing.
The bump stock was designed to very cleverly get around the intent of the law by being too-cute-by-half.
Judges don't have to throw their arms up and say Oh well!
The statute clearly is trying to avoid mechanisms to gain fully-automatic firing.
The bump stock was designed to very cleverly get around the intent of the law by being too-cute-by-half.
Judges don't have to throw their arms up and say Oh well!
Look man. This was written in like 1934. How would you have altered this slightly to account for the bump stock invention that hadn't happened yet?
Either.. this covers bump stocks, or bump stocks were specifically invented to violate the intent of this law through legalistic means.
Period
Either.. this covers bump stocks, or bump stocks were specifically invented to violate the intent of this law through legalistic means.
Period
June 15, 2024 at 8:46 PM
Look man. This was written in like 1934. How would you have altered this slightly to account for the bump stock invention that hadn't happened yet?
Either.. this covers bump stocks, or bump stocks were specifically invented to violate the intent of this law through legalistic means.
Period
Either.. this covers bump stocks, or bump stocks were specifically invented to violate the intent of this law through legalistic means.
Period