Why are you asking me? You’re the one who claims to have some special insight into the workings of the BBC.

Never trust anyone who refers to “sources close to”.

Is it something to do with fishing?

Or when you have Trump’s record on truth-telling.

If Trump can sue the BBC for suggesting that he was responsible for Jan 6 (which he obviously was), can Zelensky sue Trump for suggesting that he was responsible for the war in Ukraine (which he obviously wasn’t)?

If Trump can sue the BBC for suggesting that he was responsible for Jan 6 (which he obviously was), can Zelensky sue Trump for suggesting that he was responsible for the war in Ukraine (which he obviously wasn’t)?

If Trump can sue the BBC for suggesting that he was responsible for Jan 6 (which he obviously was), can Zelensky sue Trump for suggesting that he was responsible for the war in Ukraine (which he obviously wasn’t)?

And why did the directors tell them to do that?

The BBC is an architect of a populist assault on the BBC? Why would he BBC do that?

If Hitler had had his own personal “AI” system, he could have dispensed with the services of Dr Joseph Goebbels.

I'm happy to concede that there has been a fair bit wrong with the BBC in recent times (endlessly platforming Farage and largely ignoring the Gill affair can be added to other faults), but that doesn't affect the fact that there is a populist assault on the BBC.

As is this:
podcasts.apple.com/gb/podcast/t...

This is relevant historical background:
podcasts.apple.com/gb/podcast/t...

Who is the more reliable source of information? The BBC or Karoline Leavitt? That should be a very easy question for anyone.

I know what I think about their respective agendas. I don't know what you think. You're obviously not very imterested in making yourself clear. So goodbye.