BleepBloopBloam
BleepBloopBloam
@bleepbloopbloam.bsky.social
JFC I never thought I'd read the phrase "Marco Rubio moment". Please shoot me.
December 21, 2025 at 2:37 PM
In my dreams, I suppose anything is possible?! I'd rather just not have the gov have the ability to shut off my car if they feel like it. License plate readers similarly give me the fucking creeps.
December 18, 2025 at 2:17 AM
The parallel is that it's a law, with good intentions, that can certainly be abused by jerks.
December 18, 2025 at 2:14 AM
So that means you're a big fan of KOSA, then, I assume?
December 18, 2025 at 1:28 AM
Certainly some technological improvements are more easy to use by an oppressive government than others. I'm not saying that this is a particular dangerous candidate, but this phrase suggests that because anything can be perverted, nothing should be discouraged simply because of threat of misuse.
December 18, 2025 at 1:28 AM
lol "GOP moderates"
December 17, 2025 at 3:32 PM
I asked that question and was told that nobody has the right to drive, the government pays for road maintenance and such, so ... so there!

Then they called me a bad word and I was sad.
December 17, 2025 at 2:40 AM
I can't help but feel like there's a 10% chance of a Milkshake Duck end to this ... some possible motivation.
December 15, 2025 at 5:06 AM
Language!
December 14, 2025 at 7:29 PM
The creepiness of the govt being able to remotely control your car is at the heart of at least some of the pushback.
December 14, 2025 at 2:19 PM
Not an impeachable offense, though, I'm sure you agree.
December 12, 2025 at 5:21 PM
Let's not forget that their winning of the World Series after a thousand-year drought was directly responsible for the mess we're in in the first place.
December 12, 2025 at 4:28 PM
Your vote on Impeachment today was pathetic.
December 12, 2025 at 4:44 AM
God, how do I get a job as cushy as being one of your social media drones?
December 10, 2025 at 8:10 PM
Is there any chance at *all* that one of the drones in her office will give their thoughts on this?
www.teenvogue.com/story/some-d...
Why Are Some Democrats Backing MAGA's Anti-LGBTQ+ Censorship?
From late-night host cancellations to removing LGBTQ+ history from government sites, politicians in both parties are contributing to the overwriting of the internet — a place where lots of queer and t...
www.teenvogue.com
December 10, 2025 at 12:40 AM
Agreed -- curious what Grim thinks / how his take is wrong.
December 7, 2025 at 1:24 AM
And it looks like it was a unanimous decision, that accepting a pardon didn't mean accepting guilt, and the lead judge was an Obama appointee.
December 6, 2025 at 4:56 AM
I'm guessing we're reading the same thing (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Burdick...), which suggests that it was even iffy before then. Obviously, a difference between establishing the reasons behind the right to refuse a pardon (which is what the case was about) and the reasons to accept one.
Burdick v. United States - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
December 6, 2025 at 4:56 AM
With all due respect, you don't have to accept guilt to accept a pardon, that's silly.
December 6, 2025 at 1:50 AM
Is that a question ever asked during voir dire?
December 6, 2025 at 1:22 AM
I like to think that canceling my VF subscription with "Ugh" as the reason might have played a small part. Doubt I was the only one who did so.
December 6, 2025 at 12:00 AM
Make sure you put that in your memoir.
December 4, 2025 at 8:39 PM
Needed to be 2x as long IMHO.
December 4, 2025 at 7:33 PM
That was my first thought as well. The pauses are just ... weird.
December 4, 2025 at 4:31 PM
Thanks for making me throw up.
December 4, 2025 at 2:50 PM