It provides a good defensive shape as well.

Doesn't sound like a bad idea.

I'm just not sure we can soak up pressure with our defence and midfield. Might be better on the front foot

The thing is, when we play a back five we still concede goals but create even less in attack as we have no width. Also, playing two crap strikers instead of one doesn't equal goals

If he's a traitor to racist scumbags, he might actually be less of a bell end than I originally thought

Every year I pray we don't get Colchester away, so in a way this is a small victory.

At least it isn't racist Gillingham away

Bit innappropriate him saying that while clutching a big pile of Richmond sausages. Share the wealth.

Fair point, well made 😀

I'll raise you John Sitton youtu.be/XVj45yN72uU?...

Even Pep has gone more direct this season. Our best chance is to be solid at the back and to counter with pace. We've actually got quick players this season but we don't seem to utilise them effectively

Spot on. As a low budget underdog, our game plan should be about counter attacking and taking advantage of the space teams leave us. Dominating possession is for the rich clubs with the players who can do it. Annoyingly, we seem to have the personnel to counter attack but our attacks are often slow

I've never understood why he bought us. There's no assets to strip and he doesn't have the money to make us competitive. Just seems like an ego trip for a bored old man. I just hope that he isn't taking out loans against the club as that could be the end of us.

Seems we only get to choose between right wing parties these days. Pretty depressing.

It's the ones who do it without charging money that worry me.

I don't know what's more embarrassing. The fact that we rolled over for a belly rub from a paedophile rapist or that we are subservient to a family of inbreds who act superior to us and happily entertain the paedophile rapist.