Blachloch
@blachloch.bsky.social
Talking Gaming, chatting with friends etc. Don't assume there is going to be anything deep and meaningful from this account.
Traitors Ireland will be available in the UK soon I think, so I'll make sure to watch it as soon as it is.
November 11, 2025 at 2:11 AM
Traitors Ireland will be available in the UK soon I think, so I'll make sure to watch it as soon as it is.
Probably the best finale I've ever seen. I tend to think of Traitors as being two shows. Everything up to the finale, and then the finale.
Some seasons seem have a fantastic pre-finale, and a good finale, but Aus S2 was a good pre-finale and an awesome finale.
Some seasons seem have a fantastic pre-finale, and a good finale, but Aus S2 was a good pre-finale and an awesome finale.
November 11, 2025 at 1:52 AM
Probably the best finale I've ever seen. I tend to think of Traitors as being two shows. Everything up to the finale, and then the finale.
Some seasons seem have a fantastic pre-finale, and a good finale, but Aus S2 was a good pre-finale and an awesome finale.
Some seasons seem have a fantastic pre-finale, and a good finale, but Aus S2 was a good pre-finale and an awesome finale.
"You knew I was a sharer, but if I wasn't going to win, no one was going to win" Oh my word!!
And the reaction by Sam and Blake, they just seemed to feel so entitled to it, and that Camille didn't deserve it.
They foolishly underestimated her, and she had them pegged to a tee.
And the reaction by Sam and Blake, they just seemed to feel so entitled to it, and that Camille didn't deserve it.
They foolishly underestimated her, and she had them pegged to a tee.
November 11, 2025 at 1:50 AM
"You knew I was a sharer, but if I wasn't going to win, no one was going to win" Oh my word!!
And the reaction by Sam and Blake, they just seemed to feel so entitled to it, and that Camille didn't deserve it.
They foolishly underestimated her, and she had them pegged to a tee.
And the reaction by Sam and Blake, they just seemed to feel so entitled to it, and that Camille didn't deserve it.
They foolishly underestimated her, and she had them pegged to a tee.
The ending is absolutely chef's kiss!! I could watch it again and again. Sam thought he had everyone sussed and he had everyone under his thumb, but Camille, oh my lord Camille. Not a woman to be messed with. The way she went scorched earth, I leapt out of seat.
November 11, 2025 at 1:50 AM
The ending is absolutely chef's kiss!! I could watch it again and again. Sam thought he had everyone sussed and he had everyone under his thumb, but Camille, oh my lord Camille. Not a woman to be messed with. The way she went scorched earth, I leapt out of seat.
I assume you've seen it?
If you haven't seen it, I can really really recommend it.
If you haven't seen it, I can really really recommend it.
November 11, 2025 at 1:25 AM
I assume you've seen it?
If you haven't seen it, I can really really recommend it.
If you haven't seen it, I can really really recommend it.
I think the main point is that Oscar needs to think of his championship more, take less risks, and avoid 3 into 1 corners cos they aren't working out for him.
November 10, 2025 at 9:11 AM
I think the main point is that Oscar needs to think of his championship more, take less risks, and avoid 3 into 1 corners cos they aren't working out for him.
Also, did Oscar think Kimi would chicken out and back off and cut behind him and Charles?
Kimi held of a massively impressive performance from Max, so I don't think he's the kind of driver to chicken out of anything.
Kimi held of a massively impressive performance from Max, so I don't think he's the kind of driver to chicken out of anything.
November 10, 2025 at 9:11 AM
Also, did Oscar think Kimi would chicken out and back off and cut behind him and Charles?
Kimi held of a massively impressive performance from Max, so I don't think he's the kind of driver to chicken out of anything.
Kimi held of a massively impressive performance from Max, so I don't think he's the kind of driver to chicken out of anything.
They were coming up to a bend, so where did Oscar think Kimi was going to go?
We'll never know, but if Kimi had moved over to avoid Oscar, would he have hit Charles instead?
We'll never know, but if Kimi had moved over to avoid Oscar, would he have hit Charles instead?
November 10, 2025 at 9:11 AM
They were coming up to a bend, so where did Oscar think Kimi was going to go?
We'll never know, but if Kimi had moved over to avoid Oscar, would he have hit Charles instead?
We'll never know, but if Kimi had moved over to avoid Oscar, would he have hit Charles instead?
If Oscar wasn't alongside his mirror or wasn't in control then it was Oscar's fault. I still wouldn't have called it a 10s penalty. I do think the move was a little too ambitious by Oscar, but they are racing drivers, so he had to go for it, just maybe realise it wasn't on sooner
November 10, 2025 at 9:11 AM
If Oscar wasn't alongside his mirror or wasn't in control then it was Oscar's fault. I still wouldn't have called it a 10s penalty. I do think the move was a little too ambitious by Oscar, but they are racing drivers, so he had to go for it, just maybe realise it wasn't on sooner
But something about that rule sucks.
I think I'd have to watch it back in slow motion to see "When did Kimi START to pull across", if Oscar was along side his mirror and in control at THAT point, then Kimi was to blame.
I think I'd have to watch it back in slow motion to see "When did Kimi START to pull across", if Oscar was along side his mirror and in control at THAT point, then Kimi was to blame.
November 10, 2025 at 9:11 AM
But something about that rule sucks.
I think I'd have to watch it back in slow motion to see "When did Kimi START to pull across", if Oscar was along side his mirror and in control at THAT point, then Kimi was to blame.
I think I'd have to watch it back in slow motion to see "When did Kimi START to pull across", if Oscar was along side his mirror and in control at THAT point, then Kimi was to blame.
If they had been on the straight, and Kimi had come across like that then you could say "Kimi forced Oscar off the track", except Oscar didn't go off the track, so that rule doesn't apply.
November 10, 2025 at 9:11 AM
If they had been on the straight, and Kimi had come across like that then you could say "Kimi forced Oscar off the track", except Oscar didn't go off the track, so that rule doesn't apply.
No, sadly it's not available in the UK... yet. Maybe it will be one day and I'll be able to smash through it.
I've watched all of the seasons of the US and two seasons of the AUS and NZ versions.
I've watched all of the seasons of the US and two seasons of the AUS and NZ versions.
November 10, 2025 at 8:33 AM
No, sadly it's not available in the UK... yet. Maybe it will be one day and I'll be able to smash through it.
I've watched all of the seasons of the US and two seasons of the AUS and NZ versions.
I've watched all of the seasons of the US and two seasons of the AUS and NZ versions.
It was great, I loved it.
November 10, 2025 at 6:38 AM
It was great, I loved it.
Is that where the Breton's come from? If it is, then I don't see a problem.
November 6, 2025 at 6:08 PM
Is that where the Breton's come from? If it is, then I don't see a problem.
It could be there's a later act that amends the need to ask for changes to style and title.
November 1, 2025 at 11:54 AM
It could be there's a later act that amends the need to ask for changes to style and title.
The tricky part is this bit. That says it needs agreement from the commonwealth to change the line of succession, but also says it needs agreement to change styles and titles, which they did.
So either they ignored getting consent for that, or only asked for consent for that?
So either they ignored getting consent for that, or only asked for consent for that?
November 1, 2025 at 11:54 AM
The tricky part is this bit. That says it needs agreement from the commonwealth to change the line of succession, but also says it needs agreement to change styles and titles, which they did.
So either they ignored getting consent for that, or only asked for consent for that?
So either they ignored getting consent for that, or only asked for consent for that?
I had tp look that up. Wasn't something I knew about before.
November 1, 2025 at 9:50 AM
I had tp look that up. Wasn't something I knew about before.
@xamxam.bsky.social @borntoeatbacon.com
It needs an act of Parliament.
Under the 1931 Statute of Westminster, to remove a person from the line of succession, Parliament would need to get the consent of every realm in the Commonwealth of which there are 56 nations.
It needs an act of Parliament.
Under the 1931 Statute of Westminster, to remove a person from the line of succession, Parliament would need to get the consent of every realm in the Commonwealth of which there are 56 nations.
November 1, 2025 at 1:34 AM
@xamxam.bsky.social @borntoeatbacon.com
It needs an act of Parliament.
Under the 1931 Statute of Westminster, to remove a person from the line of succession, Parliament would need to get the consent of every realm in the Commonwealth of which there are 56 nations.
It needs an act of Parliament.
Under the 1931 Statute of Westminster, to remove a person from the line of succession, Parliament would need to get the consent of every realm in the Commonwealth of which there are 56 nations.
Then how about...
a black and white photo of a robot with the words danger written above it .
ALT: a black and white photo of a robot with the words danger written above it .
media.tenor.com
October 30, 2025 at 1:38 PM
Then how about...
Especially when it's a case of "I need another 30-45s to reach my base but I'm not going to make it"
October 27, 2025 at 8:50 AM
Especially when it's a case of "I need another 30-45s to reach my base but I'm not going to make it"