If you are a super fan of football because of players moves you can donate to some teams trying to train people to make them better players, who can represent India. You may even take a selfie with them as you are one of the causes for their success which is again yours and countries success.

9. Bottom line: this is not theoretical — using India workforce numbers and realistic salary bands, the unpaid gratuity pool nationally is in the tens of thousands of crores (conservative lower bound ~₹30k cr). That’s employees’ money — legally held back by the 5-year cliff.

• Employers can legally retain that liability when people exit earlier.

8. What to demand (concise ask):
• Pro-rata gratuity for years worked (e.g., 4 yrs = 4/5th of 5-yr entitlement), or
• Transparent reporting from firms on gratuity liability and payouts.

That’s thousands of crores that remain with employers instead of reaching ex-employees — legal, but huge.

7. Why this happens (short):
• Gratuity needs 5 full years → big cliff.
• Tech tenure and early exits are common (career jumps, startups, GCC moves, layoffs).

6. Estimated one-time “gratuity lost” per year (if those 3.48M quit before 5y and thus don’t get any gratuity):
• Low case: 3.48M × ₹86,500 ≈ ₹30,102 crores
• Mid case: 3.48M × ₹1.44L ≈ ₹50,112 crores
• High case: 3.48M × ₹2.88L ≈ ₹100,224 crores

5. Gratuity per 5-year employee (three scenarios, using formula (15/26)×basic×5):
• Low/basic = ₹30,000 → gratuity ≈ ₹86,500
• Mid/basic = ₹50,000 → gratuity ≈ ₹1.44 lakh
• High/basic = ₹100,000 → gratuity ≈ ₹2.88 lakh.

(I could be wrong with numbers here)

4. Assumption (conservative): 60% of the 5.8M workforce will leave before completing 5 years (this matches short tech tenures + high early churn).
→ Employees leaving before 5y = 5.8M × 60% = 3.48 million.

3. Real-world context: tech/IT attrition & tenure are short — large firms report trailing attrition in low teens (TCS ~13.3%, Infosys ~14.1%); overall India Inc attrition fell to ~17.4% in 2024. LinkedIn/industry data show tech job tenure often ~2–3 years.

Another important thing why are you promoting and listing Binance Alpha shit coins while saying SAFU, you know the truth that it causes immense damage to users wealth.

There are a lot of questions to be answered with the way CZ is behaving and Binance listing shit coins.

Posted on X - 12/10/25

What was the glitch or tech error?

There have been multiple crash instances in crypto, what are the system outages or failures you faced?

What fixes have you made and is this a new kind of outage or the old one?

If new what's new with pin to pin details, if old why again?

While a DEX which is 2 years(HL) was able to work without an outage, why did an 8 year CEX fail?

Damage control methods like providing compensation etc... doesn't help the industry.

While you pointed out FTX's wrong doings, get the whole transparency to be made public.

While the on-chain wallet holdings and trxns might show that Binance hasn't gained any funds in this crash, it doesn't support as true evidence because it is a CEX not a DEX.

CEX trxns can't be guaranteed that they are always from the public wallets.

How are traditional stocks brokers handling these immense pressure times?

When crypto doesn't have clear rules and is still in an evolving state, there should be a 100% transparency of what happened as there is no regulation or board to investigate other than yourself.

Binance has been here for years, and CZ always says "SAFU".

When you expect people to adopt and grow crypto more and more, the system should also be more and more robust.

You cannot just say that under extreme load the system didn't work properly.

It costs millions of people.

If you want to take advantage of it, you have to be lucky and ready to lose what you invest.

Don't believe anyone in this space even me.

DYOR before you listen to anyone including me.

All the best, hope you all recover fast and become smarter and sharper.

Posted on X - 12/10/25