BJC860
bjc860.bsky.social
BJC860
@bjc860.bsky.social
Ahh yes, the very well known, "How do I explain this to my kids" police officer exception to the 1st amendment.

Make them pay dearly.
November 21, 2025 at 6:09 PM
I did a search on that profile and gave me this:

Looks like they changed their handle to now be "ii" in Shapiro.
November 17, 2025 at 6:06 PM
It's probably also worth noting, that you don't know what you're talking about either, which leads to confidently nonsensical and wrong assertions and vapid fallacies.

Which seems to be the entirety of what you post, so it tracks.
November 16, 2025 at 9:42 PM
And yet another straw man.

Holy shit.
November 16, 2025 at 9:41 PM
I posit that if you can't argue without vomiting out fallacy after fallacy, you shouldn't be on social media.
November 16, 2025 at 9:38 PM
Hey look, another strawman.

Amazing.
November 16, 2025 at 6:48 PM
I like how you transitioned straight from the appeal to your own (non-existent) authority fallacy to a fallacious strawman argument and didn't miss a beat or even attempt to address what was written.

Nice job.
November 16, 2025 at 6:48 PM
God damn it, every time I think you losers can't ruin your reputation any further, you prove me wrong.

After the last few days, haven't you humiliated yourselves enough already before putting out this gross, nonsensical garbage?
November 14, 2025 at 9:22 PM
Not sure if you saw this or not, but relatedly:

bsky.app/profile/juli...
🚨Megyn Kelly in 2023 re Russell Brand: “You’re 31 years old & you have sex allegedly w a 16-year old?… She was a minor. Just because you can’t be prosecuted for it doesn’t mean it’s right.”

Kelly yesterday re Epstein: “there’s a difference between a 15-year-old & a 5-year-old”

@motherjones.com:
Megyn Kelly suddenly finds pedophilia very hard to define
When a 16-year-old accused Russell Brand of rape, Kelly begged conservatives to condemn him. Now she's splitting hairs about men "into the barely legal type."
www.motherjones.com
November 14, 2025 at 1:33 PM
"Why are the Democrats letting Trump damage his credibility like this?"

Tomorrow's NYT probably.
November 14, 2025 at 1:31 PM
They hate you and think you're either stupid, have the memory of a goldfish, are children, or some combination of all three.

And they never don't circle the wagons when their abhorrent behavior blows up in their faces like this.
November 13, 2025 at 5:56 PM
And in case it's not abundantly just how bad it is, the timing of many of these emails coming out about Epstein and a NYT reporter, other NYT reporters were doing stuff like this.
November 13, 2025 at 5:56 PM
I am just going to drop this here and for no particular reason.
November 13, 2025 at 5:46 PM
You see this administration and this Congress and you think there's a meaningful difference now?

In the first term, sure this argument would be valid, not any more.
November 12, 2025 at 11:19 PM
Yes.
November 12, 2025 at 11:04 PM
This may be hard to believe, but if you actually read the report that they ling to, it's even worse than you can possibly imagine.
November 11, 2025 at 7:48 PM
Bari Weiss not understanding what standards are for is a little too on the nose.
November 11, 2025 at 2:12 PM
What in the blue hell are you even babbling about?
November 10, 2025 at 7:29 PM
Linear time, how does it even work?
November 10, 2025 at 7:22 PM
This is a very public way to announce that you do not have any idea what the fuck you're talking about.

Congrats, I guess.
November 6, 2025 at 3:03 PM
I regret to inform you that I listened to about 15 minutes of the accompanying video, and it's even worse than you can imagine.
November 6, 2025 at 2:53 PM
All of these people are trash, which is just perfect, because this lawsuit is also compete trash.

Good lord.

The attorneys that filed this nonsense should be disbarred.
November 6, 2025 at 1:56 PM
It's really not even one sided.

It's 100 percent factually wrong. None of that has actually happened.
November 6, 2025 at 12:16 PM