Bix, Fella
@bix.bsky.social
Bix, Fella; Bix@Counter.Social
Liberal USAF vet. Our country needs much stronger anti-corruption laws. Rock&Jazz & Edgar Allan Poe
Liberal USAF vet. Our country needs much stronger anti-corruption laws. Rock&Jazz & Edgar Allan Poe
I retired from the FBI this year. It scares me that this administration can use their tools to destroy anyone.
Are they really going to get a court order before the intercept what a target does on his phone or computer?
Are they really going to get a court order before the intercept what a target does on his phone or computer?
November 11, 2025 at 9:57 PM
I retired from the FBI this year. It scares me that this administration can use their tools to destroy anyone.
Are they really going to get a court order before the intercept what a target does on his phone or computer?
Are they really going to get a court order before the intercept what a target does on his phone or computer?
Reposted by Bix, Fella
Right wingers: the system needs to die so it can be replaced by my utopia where my friends and I rule
Leftists: the system needs to die so it can be replaced by my utopia where all men are equal but the girls still do the dishes
Liberals: I would like to *fix* the system so that--(pelted by stones)
Leftists: the system needs to die so it can be replaced by my utopia where all men are equal but the girls still do the dishes
Liberals: I would like to *fix* the system so that--(pelted by stones)
November 11, 2025 at 7:07 PM
Right wingers: the system needs to die so it can be replaced by my utopia where my friends and I rule
Leftists: the system needs to die so it can be replaced by my utopia where all men are equal but the girls still do the dishes
Liberals: I would like to *fix* the system so that--(pelted by stones)
Leftists: the system needs to die so it can be replaced by my utopia where all men are equal but the girls still do the dishes
Liberals: I would like to *fix* the system so that--(pelted by stones)
Reposted by Bix, Fella
Jesus!! I’m in NJ & mine is going from $189 to $343
November 11, 2025 at 3:13 PM
Jesus!! I’m in NJ & mine is going from $189 to $343
Reposted by Bix, Fella
$470 to $1570. DC. What a fucking joke.
November 11, 2025 at 3:26 AM
$470 to $1570. DC. What a fucking joke.
Reposted by Bix, Fella
Federal workers have gone without pay, people have crowd funded food to help democrats hold firm to save healthcare, but the weak faction of the Democratic Party is poised to sell everyone out.
Shame on you if you vote yes. You might as well resign, we will know you’re useless.
Shame on you if you vote yes. You might as well resign, we will know you’re useless.
November 10, 2025 at 2:29 AM
Federal workers have gone without pay, people have crowd funded food to help democrats hold firm to save healthcare, but the weak faction of the Democratic Party is poised to sell everyone out.
Shame on you if you vote yes. You might as well resign, we will know you’re useless.
Shame on you if you vote yes. You might as well resign, we will know you’re useless.
Reposted by Bix, Fella
The section on ratification is genuinely interesting, legally, if you ignore how ridiculous it was that Trump's corrupt AG tried to do this on Halloween.
But don't ignore that point. It makes it funnier.
But don't ignore that point. It makes it funnier.
![In any event, Section 3288 would not allow the government to reindict Mr. Comey if the
indictment were dismissed. The grace period is triggered only if an “indictment is found,” 18
U.S.C. § 3282; but here, the purported indictment was void ab initio. And the government cannot
“grant itself a six-month extension of the statute of limitations . . . simply by filing a patently
defective and meaningless charging document.” United States v. Gatz, 704 F. Supp. 3d 1317, 1330
(S.D. Fla. 2023). Moreover, Section 3288 states that “[t]his section does not permit the filing of a
new indictment . . . where the reason for the dismissal was the failure to file the indictment . . .
within the period prescribed by the applicable statute of limitations, or some other reason that
would bar a new prosecution.” Id. (emphasis added). That proviso applies here. Using an illegal
appointment to procure an indictment days before the statute of limitations expires—thus
depriving a person of repose—is precisely the type of “reason” that must “bar a new prosecution”
under Section 3288. Indeed, Section 3288 expressly precludes reindictment when the first
indictment was filed after expiration of the statute of limitations. To give that provision meaning,
the statute must also bar new prosecutions when a void purported indictment is secured simply to
prevent the statute of limitations from expiring. Any other reading would “obliterate the statute
of limitations.” United States v. Clawson, 104 F.3d 250, 252 (9th Cir. 1996).](https://cdn.bsky.app/img/feed_thumbnail/plain/did:plc:bbp2b224lro3bfnzcqwwnkfo/bafkreicgoi3ach4g57sawfhxuzmf5egz77ank37ejclx3iw3ogbweciuce@jpeg)
November 10, 2025 at 9:56 PM
The section on ratification is genuinely interesting, legally, if you ignore how ridiculous it was that Trump's corrupt AG tried to do this on Halloween.
But don't ignore that point. It makes it funnier.
But don't ignore that point. It makes it funnier.