Yes, exactly! The number of things that happened at the start was absolutely insane! I didn't notice for quit a while that Lawson retired the car.

Hamilton takes the lead, Lando second and Leclerc third.

They did it! P2 and P3! Leclerc and Hamilton. Ferrari's comeback!

Piastri finished 7th in Q2, while Norris finished first with .2 gap to next driver. There is nothing left of his dominance from the begging of the season.

Personally, I would go with the first solution, seems more fair. I like to think that a person "hires" an AI to do work (in this case create an image) - in such a situation an "employer" ought to be responsible.

What do you think? #AI #Disney #Universal
(8/8)

On the other Midjourney is not quite like Photoshop, people do not control every step of creation, they do not "create" images, they do not control how it turns out (they might have some control) - AI does it for them and therefore should be punished.
(7/8)

and finally they accepted the final product. This clearly shows that the originator ought to be held responsible. To illustrate my point of view: You would not penalise Adobe for creating Photoshop, which is used to commit crimes (copyright infringement, etc.), would you?
(6/8)