BisRepetita
LightNews LightNews
banner
bisrepetita.bsky.social
BisRepetita
@bisrepetita.bsky.social
33 followers 52 following 170 posts
💻 Le jour, ingénieur cybersécurité/cyberdéfense
📚 La nuit, politique/géopol/éco/socio.

❝ « Rien n’abat, ni n’abattra jamais, cette force violente et pure qui pousse les hommes et les peuples à revendiquer l’honneur de vivre debout » A. Camus
Posts Replies Media Videos
bisrepetita.bsky.social
On espère la présence de tables de ping-pong
November 18, 2025 at 5:37 PM
bisrepetita.bsky.social
On sentait @alexjubelin.bsky.social plein de sollicitude pour le bitume washingtonien dans le dernier Collimateur (bsky.app/profile/leru...), on peut se rassurer :
June 14, 2025 at 9:19 PM
bisrepetita.bsky.social
"des pompes et du gâteau" est le nouveau "panem et circenses".

Via @grandcontinent.bsky.social :

legrandcontinent.eu/fr/2025/06/1...
June 14, 2025 at 9:14 PM
bisrepetita.bsky.social
Sur le père de l'écrivain, dont on parle franchement assez peu, mais dont la vie traverse les grands enjeux de l'époque, notamment les débats parisiens sur l'esclavage, la vie militaire sous la révolution, et l'esprit de cour napoléonien (disponible en français) :
May 11, 2025 at 9:19 AM
bisrepetita.bsky.social
Michael présente ce graph, effectivement très pertinent pour analyser les situations actuelles de contre-insurrection (COIN), au regard des tactiques coloniales.

La principale différence étant qu'aujourd'hui, une force interventionniste ne gère plus que le bas du spectre.

12/
May 9, 2025 at 1:14 PM
bisrepetita.bsky.social
Cette citation d'un rapport de l'ambassadeur J. K. Galbraith, en poste au Vietnam, est un cas d'école. Il explique que sans réforme massive du gouvernement Vietnamien, tout le matériel envoyé sera inutile, mais qu'il n'y aura pas de réforme parce que Diem (le dirigeant) ne le peut pas,

3/
May 9, 2025 at 1:14 PM
bisrepetita.bsky.social
"Europe Needs a New Way to Cooperate", par @sophiabesch.bsky.social et @richardyoung.bsky.social dans @foreignaffairs.com, une proposition intéressante : www.foreignaffairs.com/ukraine/euro...
To ensure both strategic autonomy and inclusivity, Europe needs a reformed order centered on treaty-based cooperation among the continent’s liberal democracies, including both EU members and nonmembers. It should be built around an innovative institutional structure in which different clusters of states participate to varying degrees across all areas of policy. Unlike ad hoc coalitions of the willing, this model would be anchored by an institutional core. Each cluster would establish its own governance arrangements led by the governments of participating states and would be subject to oversight—by an appointed intergovernmental secretariat, perhaps, or a parliamentary body composed of representatives from the cluster’s member states. Countries would join these clusters voluntarily—likely through agreements on certain areas of policy—allowing for some overlap in memberships to different clusters. Nordic and Mediterranean states with complementary energy profiles could unite in a climate cluster, for example. Ukraine could cooperate fully with European states on foreign and security policies without having to wait for the result of formal EU accession talks. There is no need to abandon EU institutions, laws, and processes that function well for certain policy areas. The body should continue to govern the continent’s tech, digital, and trade policies, for instance. But the cluster model offers a way to break persistent deadlocks on other, more controversial areas of policy, such as defense or climate action, by allowing groups of like-minded European states to cooperate more deeply without the constraint of needing EU-wide unanimity. Although the core clusters—especially the one focused on security—would require a firm commitment to liberal democratic values, the memberships of others could be broader. Crucially, membership would not be static: governments could be suspended or expelled by the cluster if they violate foundational norms. And decisions made within a cluster would be binding only to the members of that cluster. The flexibility of this model can help the continent establish clear obligations and joint decision-making mechanisms. European security experts have been calling for this kind of integration for many years. Yet in practice, policymakers have doubled down on protecting their own institutions rather than fashioning a much-needed new template for European order. The shock of Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine led Europeans to launch a broad rearmament effort to defend the continent against military invasion. The shock of the Trump administration’s ideological attack against European values—expressed most vividly by Vice President JD Vance at the Munich Security Conference, in February—invites European governments to rethink the basic parameters of their regional order. It is a highly welcome development that European leaders seem to be stepping up to take over more responsibility, but this is not the same thing as comprehensively preparing Europe for a new, more challenging era. Without big and tangible steps, the “new European beginning” that these leaders have so confidently announced will likely prove to be another false dawn.
May 6, 2025 at 7:29 AM
bisrepetita.bsky.social
En 1763, après sa défaite dans la guerre de 7 ans, la couronne de France perd ses territoires de Nouvelle-France (un vaste empire, qui s'étendait sur une large partie des actuels US et Canada), au profit des couronnes britanniques et espagnoles.

2/
April 24, 2025 at 7:58 AM
bisrepetita.bsky.social
Donc avec comme seules ressources leur épargne personnelle et la SS.

Et 20% qui comptent en majorité sur les allocations de la SS pour vivre.

Très surpris d'apprendre que la SS US utilise un barème très régressif, donc avec un haut degré de redistributivité !

www.aarp.org/social-secur...
April 23, 2025 at 5:29 PM
bisrepetita.bsky.social
...anagramme dans plusieurs de ses livres interroge, surtout quand on connaît la tendance des autocrates à virer les compétents pour s'entourer de courtisans.

19/
Navarro est l’auteur de nombreux ouvrages, dont Death by China (2011), où il critique la politique économique chinoise. Il a été accusé d’avoir inventé un expert fictif, « Ron Vara » (anagramme de Navarro), cité dans plusieurs de ses livres, ce qui a terni sa crédibilité académique. En 2023, il promeut un jeu de société relayant des théories complotistes sur l’élection de 2020 et la pandémie de Covid-19[14].
April 23, 2025 at 8:41 AM