Biruz
@biruz.bsky.social
Minha crítica é inefável e minha parrésia é grandiosa; minha eloquência, contudo, é um lixo.
Yeah. Any non-superpowered guy should have at least some difficulty
September 24, 2024 at 12:31 PM
Yeah. Any non-superpowered guy should have at least some difficulty
Personally, this is one of my biggest gripes with reincarnation/time-reversing stories. The main character somehow has perfect memory, and his younger self is never better than his old self outside of a healthier body.
It's good to know that people share this same opinion.
It's good to know that people share this same opinion.
September 23, 2024 at 12:50 PM
Personally, this is one of my biggest gripes with reincarnation/time-reversing stories. The main character somehow has perfect memory, and his younger self is never better than his old self outside of a healthier body.
It's good to know that people share this same opinion.
It's good to know that people share this same opinion.
Gotta admit that "Character Limit" is a cool name
September 22, 2024 at 7:58 AM
Gotta admit that "Character Limit" is a cool name
You can have the same benefits to even greater extents depending on the method used and exact content viewed.
September 19, 2024 at 6:27 PM
You can have the same benefits to even greater extents depending on the method used and exact content viewed.
Even though overweight isn't obese, people treat them as the same due to this family resemblance and the overuse of both. The more words represent particulars, the better.
Just some tips for your position.
Just some tips for your position.
September 19, 2024 at 5:34 PM
Even though overweight isn't obese, people treat them as the same due to this family resemblance and the overuse of both. The more words represent particulars, the better.
Just some tips for your position.
Just some tips for your position.
In other words, this particular change would not only give any benefits, but also add some negatives to the body positive community; "hear-effect" would become more negative as concept creep tunes in(even more of the "fat-scare"), e.g "overweight".
September 19, 2024 at 5:33 PM
In other words, this particular change would not only give any benefits, but also add some negatives to the body positive community; "hear-effect" would become more negative as concept creep tunes in(even more of the "fat-scare"), e.g "overweight".
At the same time, "Cardiovascular Risk" expresses a whole range of risks, which Obesity is its most extreme end. One being diagnosed as "obese" is obviously worse than "a little fat".
September 19, 2024 at 5:33 PM
At the same time, "Cardiovascular Risk" expresses a whole range of risks, which Obesity is its most extreme end. One being diagnosed as "obese" is obviously worse than "a little fat".
"Obesity" is a medical term and, as a result, will be dissociated from body weight if the study concludes that the concept isn't strictly necessary for its definition.
People only use it to express body weight because the medical definition says so.
Therefore, changing the name won't be necessary.
People only use it to express body weight because the medical definition says so.
Therefore, changing the name won't be necessary.
September 19, 2024 at 5:22 PM
"Obesity" is a medical term and, as a result, will be dissociated from body weight if the study concludes that the concept isn't strictly necessary for its definition.
People only use it to express body weight because the medical definition says so.
Therefore, changing the name won't be necessary.
People only use it to express body weight because the medical definition says so.
Therefore, changing the name won't be necessary.
My point isn't that Lula is better or worse than Bolsonaro—nor if it's the Legislative or Executive Power's fault—, but that Ms. Campello put one on the center and front for one crisis and is not doing the same when her supported side is in essentially the same situation as the first.
September 19, 2024 at 11:55 AM
My point isn't that Lula is better or worse than Bolsonaro—nor if it's the Legislative or Executive Power's fault—, but that Ms. Campello put one on the center and front for one crisis and is not doing the same when her supported side is in essentially the same situation as the first.
Really good article. Also, the law school joke was fantastic
September 19, 2024 at 11:37 AM
Really good article. Also, the law school joke was fantastic
Is it only me or something here doesn't quite seem right?
Haven't you been putting "too much focus on the executive" during the Bozo's presidency and now you're stepping back because it's your guy letting shit burn and die?
Quite hypocritical.
Haven't you been putting "too much focus on the executive" during the Bozo's presidency and now you're stepping back because it's your guy letting shit burn and die?
Quite hypocritical.
September 19, 2024 at 11:19 AM
Is it only me or something here doesn't quite seem right?
Haven't you been putting "too much focus on the executive" during the Bozo's presidency and now you're stepping back because it's your guy letting shit burn and die?
Quite hypocritical.
Haven't you been putting "too much focus on the executive" during the Bozo's presidency and now you're stepping back because it's your guy letting shit burn and die?
Quite hypocritical.
Você fica enviando postagens, ué. Quer o quê? Que eu as ignore?
September 16, 2024 at 2:27 PM
Você fica enviando postagens, ué. Quer o quê? Que eu as ignore?
Você já corre em Kart?
September 16, 2024 at 2:09 PM
Você já corre em Kart?
Eu perguntei ao 54 qual era a resposta para tudo; ele me falou: "83."
September 16, 2024 at 1:09 PM
Eu perguntei ao 54 qual era a resposta para tudo; ele me falou: "83."
That's a good joke
But lemme be a pedant rq tho
"Wealth of Nations" was just formalizing and building upon events and characteristics of capitalism that were already happening since the beginnings of the 18th Century, mainly the division of labor. And this is acknowledged even in the first chapter
But lemme be a pedant rq tho
"Wealth of Nations" was just formalizing and building upon events and characteristics of capitalism that were already happening since the beginnings of the 18th Century, mainly the division of labor. And this is acknowledged even in the first chapter
September 3, 2024 at 11:51 AM
That's a good joke
But lemme be a pedant rq tho
"Wealth of Nations" was just formalizing and building upon events and characteristics of capitalism that were already happening since the beginnings of the 18th Century, mainly the division of labor. And this is acknowledged even in the first chapter
But lemme be a pedant rq tho
"Wealth of Nations" was just formalizing and building upon events and characteristics of capitalism that were already happening since the beginnings of the 18th Century, mainly the division of labor. And this is acknowledged even in the first chapter
If people want chicken sandwich, they will get chicken sandwich. If they don't want chicken sandwich, they may buy another product. I would love to compare it to communist countries, but they sadly don't have even the bread to make the sandwich in the first place.
September 1, 2024 at 9:30 PM
If people want chicken sandwich, they will get chicken sandwich. If they don't want chicken sandwich, they may buy another product. I would love to compare it to communist countries, but they sadly don't have even the bread to make the sandwich in the first place.
Okay, then, send me the debunks. Wikipedia, Forbes, various authors, other websites and the academic consensus seem to agree with my point of view.
September 1, 2024 at 5:40 PM
Okay, then, send me the debunks. Wikipedia, Forbes, various authors, other websites and the academic consensus seem to agree with my point of view.