Lone wolf
@biomanguther.bsky.social
Anti bullying. think science. Not blindly follow ai.
@scienceguardians.bsky.social please spread the word. She blocked me for it.
June 12, 2025 at 2:34 PM
@scienceguardians.bsky.social please spread the word. She blocked me for it.
Please spread the word. I was blocked by her because of this. @ba55fr33k.bsky.social
June 12, 2025 at 2:32 PM
Please spread the word. I was blocked by her because of this. @ba55fr33k.bsky.social
@superhackers.bsky.social @benjoux.bsky.social
benjoux.bsky.social
benjoux.bsky.social
June 12, 2025 at 2:31 PM
@superhackers.bsky.social @benjoux.bsky.social
June 12, 2025 at 2:29 PM
Congratulations @elisabethbik.bsky.social! Your work has resulted in directing the new science policy which cuts funds for U.S. science to half!!! You appear to be highly valued in the Trump White House.
www.whitehouse.gov/briefings-st...
www.whitehouse.gov/briefings-st...
Remarks by Director Kratsios at the National Academy of Sciences
Remarks by Director Kratsios at the National Academy of Sciences REINVIGORATING AMERICA’S SCIENTIFIC ENTERPRISE AS PREPARED FOR DELIVERY Washington, D.C.
www.whitehouse.gov
June 11, 2025 at 8:18 PM
Congratulations @elisabethbik.bsky.social! Your work has resulted in directing the new science policy which cuts funds for U.S. science to half!!! You appear to be highly valued in the Trump White House.
www.whitehouse.gov/briefings-st...
www.whitehouse.gov/briefings-st...
Congratulations @elisabethbik.bsky.social! Your work has resulted in directing the new science policy which cuts funds for U.S. science to half!!! You appear to be highly valued in the Trump White House.
www.whitehouse.gov/briefings-st...
www.whitehouse.gov/briefings-st...
Remarks by Director Kratsios at the National Academy of Sciences
Remarks by Director Kratsios at the National Academy of Sciences REINVIGORATING AMERICA’S SCIENTIFIC ENTERPRISE AS PREPARED FOR DELIVERY Washington, D.C.
www.whitehouse.gov
June 11, 2025 at 8:18 PM
Congratulations @elisabethbik.bsky.social! Your work has resulted in directing the new science policy which cuts funds for U.S. science to half!!! You appear to be highly valued in the Trump White House.
www.whitehouse.gov/briefings-st...
www.whitehouse.gov/briefings-st...
Congratulations @elisabethbik.bsky.social! Your work has resulted in directing the new science policy which cuts funds for U.S. science to half!!! You appear to be highly valued in the Trump White House.
www.whitehouse.gov/briefings-st...
www.whitehouse.gov/briefings-st...
Remarks by Director Kratsios at the National Academy of Sciences
Remarks by Director Kratsios at the National Academy of Sciences REINVIGORATING AMERICA’S SCIENTIFIC ENTERPRISE AS PREPARED FOR DELIVERY Washington, D.C.
www.whitehouse.gov
June 11, 2025 at 8:18 PM
Congratulations @elisabethbik.bsky.social! Your work has resulted in directing the new science policy which cuts funds for U.S. science to half!!! You appear to be highly valued in the Trump White House.
www.whitehouse.gov/briefings-st...
www.whitehouse.gov/briefings-st...
Congratulations! Your work has resulted in directing the new science policy which cuts funds for U.S. science to half!!! Wonderful! You appear to be highly valued in the Trump White House. While you appear to preach one thing, your actions say differently.
www.whitehouse.gov/briefings-st...
www.whitehouse.gov/briefings-st...
Remarks by Director Kratsios at the National Academy of Sciences
Remarks by Director Kratsios at the National Academy of Sciences REINVIGORATING AMERICA’S SCIENTIFIC ENTERPRISE AS PREPARED FOR DELIVERY Washington, D.C.
www.whitehouse.gov
June 11, 2025 at 8:16 PM
Congratulations! Your work has resulted in directing the new science policy which cuts funds for U.S. science to half!!! Wonderful! You appear to be highly valued in the Trump White House. While you appear to preach one thing, your actions say differently.
www.whitehouse.gov/briefings-st...
www.whitehouse.gov/briefings-st...
Reposted by Lone wolf
There is no clear reason that this is manipulated. The images are very low resolution. Many examples of patterning of microscopic objects. Have you not read those literature?
April 15, 2025 at 2:03 PM
There is no clear reason that this is manipulated. The images are very low resolution. Many examples of patterning of microscopic objects. Have you not read those literature?
Fully agreed Brett. The same rigor she is applying to others does not apply to her. Weird.
April 15, 2025 at 6:04 PM
Fully agreed Brett. The same rigor she is applying to others does not apply to her. Weird.
Just to let you know Bik blocked me. She can’t stand dissent. She fills her social media with people who support her conclusions. What a loser.
April 15, 2025 at 6:00 PM
Just to let you know Bik blocked me. She can’t stand dissent. She fills her social media with people who support her conclusions. What a loser.
There is no clear reason that this is manipulated. The images are very low resolution. Many examples of patterning of microscopic objects. Have you not read those literature?
April 15, 2025 at 2:03 PM
There is no clear reason that this is manipulated. The images are very low resolution. Many examples of patterning of microscopic objects. Have you not read those literature?
Shame. The only person who has died was the first author here. Shame on you all.
April 14, 2025 at 7:11 PM
Shame. The only person who has died was the first author here. Shame on you all.
Check it out. The author is actually dead. The others reproduced the work. That is called reproducibility.
April 14, 2025 at 7:09 PM
Check it out. The author is actually dead. The others reproduced the work. That is called reproducibility.
Reposted by Lone wolf
my point is that most most 90% of what Science found in their internal review process was that most of the duplicated/ manipulated images etc were copy past errors not deliberate.
I do not know about that paper u talk and i do not think it is productive to talk about single papers
I do not know about that paper u talk and i do not think it is productive to talk about single papers
April 14, 2025 at 6:20 AM
my point is that most most 90% of what Science found in their internal review process was that most of the duplicated/ manipulated images etc were copy past errors not deliberate.
I do not know about that paper u talk and i do not think it is productive to talk about single papers
I do not know about that paper u talk and i do not think it is productive to talk about single papers
Reposted by Lone wolf
Overall (in my opinion) fraud is quite quite low in science, especially among decent quality journals.
biks focus on single examples and posting them online to get famous, rather than doing e.g., a real study on the issue, is the problem in my opinion.
again i ask what % is she right about?
biks focus on single examples and posting them online to get famous, rather than doing e.g., a real study on the issue, is the problem in my opinion.
again i ask what % is she right about?
April 14, 2025 at 6:22 AM
Overall (in my opinion) fraud is quite quite low in science, especially among decent quality journals.
biks focus on single examples and posting them online to get famous, rather than doing e.g., a real study on the issue, is the problem in my opinion.
again i ask what % is she right about?
biks focus on single examples and posting them online to get famous, rather than doing e.g., a real study on the issue, is the problem in my opinion.
again i ask what % is she right about?
Reposted by Lone wolf
there are no systematic studies of how many she posts on social media really turn out to be fraud, and her refusal to do any real science about it reveals more about her than her work does about science at large. she is more interested in getting social media famous than doing real science (imo)
April 14, 2025 at 6:23 AM
there are no systematic studies of how many she posts on social media really turn out to be fraud, and her refusal to do any real science about it reveals more about her than her work does about science at large. she is more interested in getting social media famous than doing real science (imo)
Reposted by Lone wolf
I read the pubpeer discussion, the authors appear to be engaging in good faith. the first author who probably did it has been dead 12 years.
absent any hard evidence, bik posts all kinds of garbage, just look at her pubpeer history, i think it is inconclusive. certainly bik does not mean anything
absent any hard evidence, bik posts all kinds of garbage, just look at her pubpeer history, i think it is inconclusive. certainly bik does not mean anything
April 14, 2025 at 6:29 AM
I read the pubpeer discussion, the authors appear to be engaging in good faith. the first author who probably did it has been dead 12 years.
absent any hard evidence, bik posts all kinds of garbage, just look at her pubpeer history, i think it is inconclusive. certainly bik does not mean anything
absent any hard evidence, bik posts all kinds of garbage, just look at her pubpeer history, i think it is inconclusive. certainly bik does not mean anything
Reposted by Lone wolf
When i started asking Bik about why she didn't do any real studies in this area instead of just posting papers online, she went through my publications and tried to put pubpeer comments on them. had to reach out to editor to get it to stop. serial harasser who makes her money harassing
April 14, 2025 at 6:31 AM
When i started asking Bik about why she didn't do any real studies in this area instead of just posting papers online, she went through my publications and tried to put pubpeer comments on them. had to reach out to editor to get it to stop. serial harasser who makes her money harassing
Reposted by Lone wolf
you have to think about her incentives, she gets paid to find problems, that is what she is famous for. she doesnt have any ethical approval or safeguards on her conduct and the more crazy she is the more attention she gets from unknowing social media dopes
April 14, 2025 at 6:32 AM
you have to think about her incentives, she gets paid to find problems, that is what she is famous for. she doesnt have any ethical approval or safeguards on her conduct and the more crazy she is the more attention she gets from unknowing social media dopes
Reposted by Lone wolf
people need to start asking her to do real studies on the issue, not focus on this individual study or that individual study.
How does she pick her targets? was it chance that i asked her about real studies in the area and she went through my papers the next day? is it ethical and right? id say no
How does she pick her targets? was it chance that i asked her about real studies in the area and she went through my papers the next day? is it ethical and right? id say no
April 14, 2025 at 6:39 AM
people need to start asking her to do real studies on the issue, not focus on this individual study or that individual study.
How does she pick her targets? was it chance that i asked her about real studies in the area and she went through my papers the next day? is it ethical and right? id say no
How does she pick her targets? was it chance that i asked her about real studies in the area and she went through my papers the next day? is it ethical and right? id say no