No. How would this restriction help with anything? Reported results matter, not citations. If anybody is citing nonexistent publications, it shows embarrassing and sloppy work. Where are peer-reviewers to reject the paper?

I will send birds to stop by your window. 🦜

Czechs made it easier for you,
mzv.gov.cz/jnp/en/infor...

If you want to know there is no other approach but scientific method. It works for everything. But many prefers
feeling to knowing.

They compete with Grackles.

I think it needs more AI creativity.

I do not get much scientific info from social media. They only contain promoted, selected, catchy stuff.

It depends on Science field. Biology, chemistry, medicine is in NCBI database. You can search largest publishers of scientific peer-reviewed articles, Elsevier sciencedirect , Wiley online library, Springer Nature., etc. Search main scientific society in your field, e. g. American Chemical Society.

What is squeezed light, and how does it allow the standard quantum limit to be surpassed? Yoichi Aso explains in an accompanying Perspective. 🧪🔭
www.science.org/doi/10.1126/...

Do not underestimate BlueSky readers. Surprisingly close will not cut it. Where is statistics? Chi-square, Q-values? 😉