Andy Gonzalez
banner
bio-diverse.bsky.social
Andy Gonzalez
@bio-diverse.bsky.social
Dad x2 | Scientist working on the causes and consequences of biodiversity loss | Liber Ero Chair @McGillU | co-chair GEOBON | co-director QCBS | co-chair IPBES biodiversity monitoring assessment | co-founder Habitat | He/Him
The aim is to build trust and comparability. Whether you're a scientist, a CEO reporting for TNFD, or a policymaker tracking #GBF targets, the data and indicators need to be robust and reliable. This framework shows how. #ESG
September 19, 2025 at 6:54 PM
3/3: The framework is modular, tiered, and built on FAIR & CARE principles. It's a call to build a common infrastructure. We need to get this done. Feedback welcome. #Biodiversity #Conservation
September 19, 2025 at 6:54 PM
2/3: This isn't just for scientists. The BMSF is designed to be the auditable "data engine" for corporate disclosures (TNFD) and national reporting to the CBD. It's about connecting credible data to real decisions. #DataScience
September 19, 2025 at 6:54 PM
1/3: Think of it as a "chain of evidence" blueprint. It standardizes the entire workflow so data from different projects can actually be aggregated and compared. This is critical for robust, large-scale application of the science. #OpenScience
September 19, 2025 at 6:54 PM
Haha 😂 - glad you did. It was a v special day!
July 3, 2025 at 12:34 AM
The members of the UN expert group (aka the AHTEG) that did this analysis was composed of many fantastic colleagues most alas not on Bluesky yet. @stubutchart.bsky.social
June 10, 2025 at 12:19 PM
The 2026 national reports are the first major test for countries to show progress with their monitoring. This will be a first peak at the progress.
#Conservation #GBF #Policy #GEOBON #Biodiversity
#openaccess
Read our analysis & recommendations here:
www.nature.com/articles/s41...
Assessing coverage of the monitoring framework of the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework and opportunities to fill gaps - Nature Ecology & Evolution
This paper presents the outcomes of the gap analysis performed by the Ad Hoc Technical Expert Group on Indicators to assess current indicators in the monitoring framework of the Kunming-Montreal Globa...
www.nature.com
June 10, 2025 at 12:19 PM
So what now? It’s not enough to have a framework; we have to make it work.

This requires ambition and investment to help countries develop monitoring capacity and collaborate to fill gaps and translate knowledge into action.

Our paper offers a roadmap for filling these gaps. 5/6
June 10, 2025 at 12:19 PM
📈 The Opportunity: If countries use all the optional indicators (the best-case), coverage improves to 29-47%.
But even then, 12% of the plan has no indicators at all. Key areas like benefit-sharing (Goal C) are major blind spots. 4/6
June 10, 2025 at 12:19 PM
🚨 The Reality Check: If countries only report on the required (headline + binary) indicators, the monitoring framework has big gaps: it only covers 19-40% of the GBF’s goals and targets. We'll miss most of the story. 3/6
June 10, 2025 at 12:19 PM
First, the monitoring framework has "required" indicators (the floor for reporting) and "optional" ones (for countries that want to be more comprehensive).

This distinction is critical, as our analysis shows.
2/6
June 10, 2025 at 12:19 PM
Very happy to send you the PDF of the article.
May 30, 2025 at 2:16 PM
Sure, send me an email and I’ll send you the PDF.
April 25, 2025 at 9:11 PM