I agree that it is insensitive to deliberate consideration to some degree, but I think that it does tip if you account for all costs and all benefits.

Reconsidering views that form your identity is expensive, so people normally don’t bother.

There’s a real generosity in how you share science—never prescriptive, always thoughtful. 7½ Lessons felt like a dual-layered gift: a clear summary of ideas, and a rich map of evidence behind them.

Yes, it’s interesting how the act of ‘Photoshop’-ping has become a cultural shorthand for trying to misrepresent reality.

I’m not sure that I agree with this.

I think that both curation and editing can be used to lie and tell the truth.

I think that lying is more about the intent to misrepresent than any particular tool or process being used.