@bigtoe1.bsky.social
And you have no better argument than that?
I don't think I'm the idiot.
I don't think I'm the idiot.
October 19, 2025 at 3:58 PM
And you have no better argument than that?
I don't think I'm the idiot.
I don't think I'm the idiot.
I swear that man couldn't be any more in love with himself.
Polanski is a self serving, shallow narcissistic populist. Not unlike Farage. They have much in common including the ability to espouse policies that don't hold up to the slightest bit of scrutiny. Both would be a disaster for UK.
Polanski is a self serving, shallow narcissistic populist. Not unlike Farage. They have much in common including the ability to espouse policies that don't hold up to the slightest bit of scrutiny. Both would be a disaster for UK.
October 19, 2025 at 2:50 PM
I swear that man couldn't be any more in love with himself.
Polanski is a self serving, shallow narcissistic populist. Not unlike Farage. They have much in common including the ability to espouse policies that don't hold up to the slightest bit of scrutiny. Both would be a disaster for UK.
Polanski is a self serving, shallow narcissistic populist. Not unlike Farage. They have much in common including the ability to espouse policies that don't hold up to the slightest bit of scrutiny. Both would be a disaster for UK.
You've done the denying, deflecting, projecting, blaming and now onto the minimising.
Like every abuser and those that defend them.
Well done.
Like every abuser and those that defend them.
Well done.
October 11, 2025 at 2:58 PM
You've done the denying, deflecting, projecting, blaming and now onto the minimising.
Like every abuser and those that defend them.
Well done.
Like every abuser and those that defend them.
Well done.
Smashed up the building, broke windows?
What's wrong with you , keeping defending this?
What's wrong with you , keeping defending this?
October 11, 2025 at 1:21 PM
Smashed up the building, broke windows?
What's wrong with you , keeping defending this?
What's wrong with you , keeping defending this?
I'm fine with any peaceful protest. Those people were violent and broke the law. The conference organisers want their attendees to be safe I presume ?
Anyone should be able to protest peacefully.
Anyone should be able to protest peacefully.
October 11, 2025 at 12:41 PM
I'm fine with any peaceful protest. Those people were violent and broke the law. The conference organisers want their attendees to be safe I presume ?
Anyone should be able to protest peacefully.
Anyone should be able to protest peacefully.
No idea but I don't support censoring and closing down of legitimate debate in any form so don't try to suggest I do.
You clearly do.
Debate with argument. Don't silence, censor, exclude and threaten just because you don't agree
Democracy is over if you do.
You clearly do.
Debate with argument. Don't silence, censor, exclude and threaten just because you don't agree
Democracy is over if you do.
October 11, 2025 at 10:32 AM
No idea but I don't support censoring and closing down of legitimate debate in any form so don't try to suggest I do.
You clearly do.
Debate with argument. Don't silence, censor, exclude and threaten just because you don't agree
Democracy is over if you do.
You clearly do.
Debate with argument. Don't silence, censor, exclude and threaten just because you don't agree
Democracy is over if you do.
And now you are speaking for " majority" of feminists too? Really? Where's your evidence for that?
October 11, 2025 at 10:25 AM
And now you are speaking for " majority" of feminists too? Really? Where's your evidence for that?
Did she condemn those perpetrating the violence? Has anyone in The Green party?
No she provided excuses and blamed the victims.
Victims who were women gathering to discuss things like racism, violence against women. The plight of women in Afghanistan.
Utterly disgusting and indefensible.
No she provided excuses and blamed the victims.
Victims who were women gathering to discuss things like racism, violence against women. The plight of women in Afghanistan.
Utterly disgusting and indefensible.
October 11, 2025 at 10:23 AM
Did she condemn those perpetrating the violence? Has anyone in The Green party?
No she provided excuses and blamed the victims.
Victims who were women gathering to discuss things like racism, violence against women. The plight of women in Afghanistan.
Utterly disgusting and indefensible.
No she provided excuses and blamed the victims.
Victims who were women gathering to discuss things like racism, violence against women. The plight of women in Afghanistan.
Utterly disgusting and indefensible.
So because you disagree with another group's valid opinion. The response is they have no right to say it and deserve violence perpetrated at then as a result ?
You don't speak for the whole if Brighton btw. Many people there may want to be involved with this.
Anti democratic and mysoginistic= Greens
You don't speak for the whole if Brighton btw. Many people there may want to be involved with this.
Anti democratic and mysoginistic= Greens
October 11, 2025 at 10:13 AM
So because you disagree with another group's valid opinion. The response is they have no right to say it and deserve violence perpetrated at then as a result ?
You don't speak for the whole if Brighton btw. Many people there may want to be involved with this.
Anti democratic and mysoginistic= Greens
You don't speak for the whole if Brighton btw. Many people there may want to be involved with this.
Anti democratic and mysoginistic= Greens
I'm upset that she tried to silence an international women's conference and then blamed the women who organised and attended for the male violence perpetrated against them because they essentially " asked for it" by gathering and wanting a voice .
You don't think there is a problem with that?
You don't think there is a problem with that?
October 11, 2025 at 9:57 AM
I'm upset that she tried to silence an international women's conference and then blamed the women who organised and attended for the male violence perpetrated against them because they essentially " asked for it" by gathering and wanting a voice .
You don't think there is a problem with that?
You don't think there is a problem with that?
See Sian's X posts about the incident already posted but I'll post again just for you
October 11, 2025 at 9:49 AM
See Sian's X posts about the incident already posted but I'll post again just for you
October 11, 2025 at 9:32 AM
Not only blaming the women for having the temerity to meet and speak about issues that affect women thus enraging men into violence and threatening behaviour but also trying prevent the conference going ahead.
Authoritarian and mysoginistic -The Green Party
Authoritarian and mysoginistic -The Green Party
October 11, 2025 at 9:28 AM
Not only blaming the women for having the temerity to meet and speak about issues that affect women thus enraging men into violence and threatening behaviour but also trying prevent the conference going ahead.
Authoritarian and mysoginistic -The Green Party
Authoritarian and mysoginistic -The Green Party
You do realise that The Green party blame women for men's violence perpetrated against them? see @sianberry.bsky.social Let that sink in " look what you made him do"
Victim blaming at its finest
Victim blaming at its finest
October 11, 2025 at 9:06 AM
You do realise that The Green party blame women for men's violence perpetrated against them? see @sianberry.bsky.social Let that sink in " look what you made him do"
Victim blaming at its finest
Victim blaming at its finest
Someone needs to tell Sian Berry.
What a disgrace hat woman is to her sex.
What a disgrace hat woman is to her sex.
October 10, 2025 at 10:23 PM
Someone needs to tell Sian Berry.
What a disgrace hat woman is to her sex.
What a disgrace hat woman is to her sex.
Maybe I'm more cynical than you.
October 5, 2025 at 4:28 PM
Maybe I'm more cynical than you.
As a constituent who voted for you can I ask when you are going to focus on the needs of those who elected you rather than superficial publicity campaigns which seem only to serve your own political career and public profile?
Style over substance really comes to mind. Disappointing.
Style over substance really comes to mind. Disappointing.
October 5, 2025 at 3:30 PM
As a constituent who voted for you can I ask when you are going to focus on the needs of those who elected you rather than superficial publicity campaigns which seem only to serve your own political career and public profile?
Style over substance really comes to mind. Disappointing.
Style over substance really comes to mind. Disappointing.
This man oozes insincerity, narcissism and arrogance to me.
I don't trust people who change their names and inhabit a concocted, contrived version of themselves.
I really wouldn't be surprised if some skeletons in the cupboard yet to be revealed.
He's yet another populist politician.
I don't trust people who change their names and inhabit a concocted, contrived version of themselves.
I really wouldn't be surprised if some skeletons in the cupboard yet to be revealed.
He's yet another populist politician.
October 5, 2025 at 3:08 PM
This man oozes insincerity, narcissism and arrogance to me.
I don't trust people who change their names and inhabit a concocted, contrived version of themselves.
I really wouldn't be surprised if some skeletons in the cupboard yet to be revealed.
He's yet another populist politician.
I don't trust people who change their names and inhabit a concocted, contrived version of themselves.
I really wouldn't be surprised if some skeletons in the cupboard yet to be revealed.
He's yet another populist politician.
A Terf and a liar?
Abuse for merely stating a fact. Come on now just be kind.
Thank you for your mysoginy.
Abuse for merely stating a fact. Come on now just be kind.
Thank you for your mysoginy.
September 25, 2025 at 11:31 AM
A Terf and a liar?
Abuse for merely stating a fact. Come on now just be kind.
Thank you for your mysoginy.
Abuse for merely stating a fact. Come on now just be kind.
Thank you for your mysoginy.
The law never changed and was always thus. The SC merely clarified that.
That people chose to misinterpret the law, encouraged by various bodies and quangos is the problem.
That people chose to misinterpret the law, encouraged by various bodies and quangos is the problem.
September 25, 2025 at 11:18 AM
The law never changed and was always thus. The SC merely clarified that.
That people chose to misinterpret the law, encouraged by various bodies and quangos is the problem.
That people chose to misinterpret the law, encouraged by various bodies and quangos is the problem.
Severe autism can be devastating for a child and their family. I'm afraid I would fear that and wouldn't want it for my offspring. The condition is very much on a spectrum, the severe end of which causes significant and profound difficulties.
September 24, 2025 at 5:04 PM
Severe autism can be devastating for a child and their family. I'm afraid I would fear that and wouldn't want it for my offspring. The condition is very much on a spectrum, the severe end of which causes significant and profound difficulties.
Schrodinger's Lib Dem party?
Following the law on this particular issue whilst simultaneously not following the law on said issue.
Following the law on this particular issue whilst simultaneously not following the law on said issue.
September 24, 2025 at 4:00 PM
Schrodinger's Lib Dem party?
Following the law on this particular issue whilst simultaneously not following the law on said issue.
Following the law on this particular issue whilst simultaneously not following the law on said issue.
What's wrong with being divorced?
Is that some kind of slur now?
" Look at you you sad divorcee" 😂
Is that some kind of slur now?
" Look at you you sad divorcee" 😂
September 3, 2025 at 10:17 AM
What's wrong with being divorced?
Is that some kind of slur now?
" Look at you you sad divorcee" 😂
Is that some kind of slur now?
" Look at you you sad divorcee" 😂